I agree on the APA Masters points. They just restarted Masters in our area this past session and we formed a team. I enjoyed consistently playing against good players. I enjoyed getting home earlier. I enjoyed the format. I only won one match but learned a lot and consistently got better. If there were a second night of Masters, I'd bag the regular APA and only play Masters.
My primary ***** about regular APA is how long it takes and subsequently getting home really late. This is the major complaint with lots of people and I think holds some people back from playing in an APA league. IMHO, speeding up play should be the number one focus of APA for the purpose of growing their membership. It could be fixed with the right degree of focus. At least an hour per night is wasted needlessly. The biggest waste of time is the most frustrating to me because it is totally unnecessary. One match finishes. Takes up to 10 minutes sometimes for the team who puts up to do so. Then that player has to be found, usually outside having a cigarette. Then he has to come in and get all his equipment out of case and assembled. Just stupid. I think this could be solved by setting all the match ups prior to the beginning of play. The two Captains could just go back and forth with their respective turns and have that set by league start time. They could have a rule that anybody not ready to play within 2 minutes following the end of a match forfeits. Limit time outs to one minute in length.
I think the sandbagging thing is over rated. Part of the problem is the difference in leagues and another part is score keeping. Part of handicapping is the relative strength of play. Strong league, lower handicaps. Not sure if there is much to be done about that. Most scorekeepers are rather clueless about marking defensive shots and doing so isn't emphasized, not doing so isn't penalized.
At the end of the day, it's real simple. If you don't like APA, don't play in it. But why constantly find the need to complain about it? Despite some of the negatives, APA does have a lot of positives. It gets a lot of people playing pool. Many of the pool players complaining about APA might end up very unhappy if APA no longer existed and that subsequently caused a further downsizing of pool in the country. Many of the smaller bars love APA and the revenue it brings into their establishment. They do a number of things to cater to APA. If not for APA, those bars may not even exist or may replace their pool tables with bar stools.
Why bother complaining about payouts? I don't know anybody that got rich being big winners in BCA or any other amateur league. Seriously, you're playing a certain league because you get $100 or so more per session? When you consider the number of hours you put in and then figure out what that nets you on a hourly rate, that's outright laughable.
good post.
i play 2 apa divisions... sun night double jeapordy and tue night 8 ball travel.
we start at 7:00 on sun night and are usually done by 10:30 with both 8 and 9 ball.
for some reason my tue night league drags on forever. we start at 7:30 and usually it ends about 11:30 .that is with starting a 2nd table if we are not finished with the 4th match by 10:00.
looking at it strictly time wise tue night only lasts 1/2 hour longer . i guess it just seems a lot longer because you just sit around watching 1 match at a time. sun night seems to go by fast since you plat 2 matches and its just more going on during that time vs watching 1 match at a time.
i may try masters again next summer... just got too much going on right now.
like i said i did enjoy playing in it 2 years ago even though i was only a 4 at the time. i may enjoy it a lil better now since i am a lil better player than i was then.