Now the John vs. Lou poll removed

Tap Tap, this is the real deal! When I was a young man, I practiced and played as much as any living human and I reached my full potential as a pool player. I played pretty good but always a speed or two below the top players. They just had more ability then me and I could see it. That's why I finally gave up and became a tournament director. My friend Danny Diliberto said it best to me one day, "Jay, you're a shortstop for life!"

So you got to world class. Because if I recall you have beaten top pros in tournaments have you not?

I need to read your book again but I thought you always had some extra business going because you realized that the income was sporadic for a pool player. Am I wrong or was there a time when you practiced that much and were mentored by world class players?
 
:-) the west coast is on the menu for sure but later in the year. Don't worry Jay I am not scared of you either. I always have five hundred ready to donate to any senior citizen who can take it. I know how I bank and its good enough to play you. And if you find any bank I won't shoot that you will you can have a free $100.

Don't forget the old man in Northern California if you get up this way.

Would enjoy playing you, win or lose.
 
ok. So, credible science is that which confirms your belief?

The funny thing about these forums is that whenever a person states an opinion the assumption by those who differ is that the opposing person has ALWAYS held that opposing opinion.

In my case that is not true. I was once in the natural talent and limits camp just like you. But over time I have come to understand that it's a myth. The fact is that the only limits are physical ability and mental capacity.

If so then please show me one world champion that didn't put the time in. Or show me one single person who did put the time in and didn't get to world class. Just one. Show me any person who put a solid 8 hours a day of DEEP practice with a coach for years who did not become world class.

You can't.

Now show me any person who is world class who got there with less than deep practice for years.

You can't.

If you're right then the fact of it is that there ought to be dozens ad hundreds of such examples of champions who didn't have to work AS HARD as their peers to reach championship level.

But the facts show that ALL champions had to work as hard and the ones who did the best at championship level worked EVEN HARDER, doing more, going the extra distance, studying deeper than their peers. In short, what they displayed was a deeper DESIRE than their peers which then guided them to the greatest heights.

So along with the aiming system debate the talent vs. work debate will never die. It's much more romantic to believe that some people are just born to play pool and nothing else. But that's just not true. People are born with certain traits but as far as what they can DO as humans and what each person's limits are in any endeavor that is not fixed at birth if they fall in the normal range of physical and mental ability.

Some people are wired differently though, some are retarded and so they cannot ever reach the logical levels to play high level one pocket, some people are very intelligent and able to quickly recognize patterns and so they have a greater ability to play high level one pocket.

But are grandmaster chess players smarter than an average person at anything but chess? The studies prove that they are not. They are smarter at chess because they have trained their brain to be smarter at chess. They may have been drawn to chess because their brain understood it easily.

Now let's look at learning in general. In a typical class some kids appear to be smarter and race ahead through the information while other kids appear to be dumber and struggle with the information when all kids are taught at the same pace and expected to learn at the same pace. When the learning process is flipped to a situation where each kid is allowed to progress at their own pace the results are that the quicker kids finish the easier work faster then slow way down and struggle with the harder work while the slower kids absorb the easy work slowly and then go faster on the harder work. The end result is that all the kids end up with the same level of knowledge and mastery of the subjects, just at different rates.

But our school system says that those who race ahead are gifted and talented while those who lag a little are retarded or just normal.

But then that type of study and science-based learning based on real-world experience and data doesn't fit in your paradigm does it?

I was in G&T classes from sixth grade onward. I doubt very many here would consider me gifted or talented and for sure you and Dick and probably Jay consider me to be retarded.

Notable savants[edit]
The following are well-known people with savant syndrome, noted for their talent in their identified fields:
Tom Wiggins, blind American pianist and composer
Alonzo Clemons, American clay sculptor[18]
Tony DeBlois, blind American musician[18]
Jason Hughes, English sociologist[19]
Leslie Lemke, blind American musician[18]
Jonathan Lerman, American artist[18]
Derek Paravicini, blind British musician[20]
Anthony Torrone, American Christian writer[21][22]
Gilles Tréhin, artist, author[23]
James Henry Pullen, gifted British carpenter[24][25]
Matt Savage, American autistic jazz prodigy[26][27]
Henriett Seth F., Hungarian autistic savant, poet, writer, and artist[28]
Stephen Wiltshire, British architectural artist[29]
Richard Wawro, British artist[18]
George and Charles Finn, calendar calculator twins[30][31]
Florence 'Flo' and Katherine 'Kay' Lyman, calendar calculator twins[32]
Daniel Tammet, British author[33]
Rex Lewis-Clack, blind American pianist
Jason Padgett, obtained fractal drawing skills following a mugging incident.[34][35]
Kim Peek, American "megasavant" with exceptional memory

Some people are just wired different. And people like us who believe we can get there with them with better information and more hard work are just mad at our money...lol
 
Last edited:
ok. So, credible science is that which confirms your belief?

The funny thing about these forums is that whenever a person states an opinion the assumption by those who differ is that the opposing person has ALWAYS held that opposing opinion.

In my case that is not true. I was once in the natural talent and limits camp just like you. But over time I have come to understand that it's a myth. The fact is that the only limits are physical ability and mental capacity.

If so then please show me one world champion that didn't put the time in. Or show me one single person who did put the time in and didn't get to world class. Just one. Show me any person who put a solid 8 hours a day of DEEP practice with a coach for years who did not become world class.

You can't.

Now show me any person who is world class who got there with less than deep practice for years.

You can't.

If you're right then the fact of it is that there ought to be dozens ad hundreds of such examples of champions who didn't have to work AS HARD as their peers to reach championship level.

But the facts show that ALL champions had to work as hard and the ones who did the best at championship level worked EVEN HARDER, doing more, going the extra distance, studying deeper than their peers. In short, what they displayed was a deeper DESIRE than their peers which then guided them to the greatest heights.

So along with the aiming system debate the talent vs. work debate will never die. It's much more romantic to believe that some people are just born to play pool and nothing else. But that's just not true. People are born with certain traits but as far as what they can DO as humans and what each person's limits are in any endeavor that is not fixed at birth if they fall in the normal range of physical and mental ability.

Some people are wired differently though, some are retarded and so they cannot ever reach the logical levels to play high level one pocket, some people are very intelligent and able to quickly recognize patterns and so they have a greater ability to play high level one pocket.

But are grandmaster chess players smarter than an average person at anything but chess? The studies prove that they are not. They are smarter at chess because they have trained their brain to be smarter at chess. They may have been drawn to chess because their brain understood it easily.

Now let's look at learning in general. In a typical class some kids appear to be smarter and race ahead through the information while other kids appear to be dumber and struggle with the information when all kids are taught at the same pace and expected to learn at the same pace. When the learning process is flipped to a situation where each kid is allowed to progress at their own pace the results are that the quicker kids finish the easier work faster then slow way down and struggle with the harder work while the slower kids absorb the easy work slowly and then go faster on the harder work. The end result is that all the kids end up with the same level of knowledge and mastery of the subjects, just at different rates.

But our school system says that those who race ahead are gifted and talented while those who lag a little are retarded or just normal.

But then that type of study and science-based learning based on real-world experience and data doesn't fit in your paradigm does it?

I was in G&T classes from sixth grade onward. I doubt very many here would consider me gifted or talented and for sure you and Dick and probably Jay consider me to be retarded.

How did hard work and practice work out for Tim Tebow
Vigay Singh notoriously known as the hardest worker on the PGA tour although great he's no Tiger woods ,,
Shaq was coached for yrs by the best in the business and put it thousands of hours of practice and was still maybe the worst free throw shooter of all time

As to chess most of the Greatest players are former prodigies playing grand master level at a very early age ,, we call this Gifted ,, no practice in the world brings players to this level , you either have it or you don't

Ask any instructor if they have ever taken a B level pool player over 40 and made them a pro level player and that answer will be no ,, in fact I have yet to see one get more than a couple of balls better just does not happen


1
 
How did hard work and practice work out for Tim Tebow
Vigay Singh notoriously known as the hardest worker on the PGA tour although great he's no Tiger woods ,,
Shaq was coached for yrs by the best in the business and put it thousands of hours of practice and was still maybe the worst free throw shooter of all time

As to chess most of the Greatest players are former prodigies playing grand master level at a very early age ,, we call this Gifted ,, no practice in the world brings players to this level , you either have it or you don't

Ask any instructor if they have ever taken a B level pool player over 40 and made them a pro level player and that answer will be no ,, in fact I have yet to see one get more than a couple of balls better just does not happen


1


Tim Tebow, Vijay and Shaq are horrible examples if you are trying to disprove what Barton is saying.
 
So you got to world class. Because if I recall you have beaten top pros in tournaments have you not?

I need to read your book again but I thought you always had some extra business going because you realized that the income was sporadic for a pool player. Am I wrong or was there a time when you practiced that much and were mentored by world class players?

I did beat some good players but I was still not at their level. After I beat Jimmy Fusco at the Stardust he came to L.A. and gave me 8-7 and beat me gambling. I would never have been as good a player as Jimmy no matter how much coaching and practice I had. Bottom line, he had more ability at pool then I did. At least I was smart enough to realize that.

The way we got mentored back then was to watch and observe good players, particularly ones whose style was similar to your own. I used to say that getting better at pool was half practice and half watching good players. You can learn a lot if you're paying attention! I still say that works pretty well today.

As far as your observations about the learning process in school or otherwise. There is something called Intelligence Quotient or IQ. Some people are blessed with a higher IQ and learn more quickly than others who are not so blessed. Yes, the Montessori school way of learning is a good one, but it won't make a "slow" kid as smart as a very bright one.

We are not all equally blessed as human beings. Some can jump higher and run faster and some will be scientists and inventors. Then there are some who can make a few more shots on a pool table than just about anyone else. And that's a fact Jack!

One little P.S. that is pool related. I (and everyone else) saw Louie Roberts fire long difficult cut shots in on a straight line into the pocket. He could hit those shots at warp speed and hit center pocket time after time. Think of John Schmidt making his best shot ever. Well that was Louie times ten! Other top players (including Earl) would attempt to shoot shots like Louie did while practicing. No one ever could match him, not even close. Louie had some magical skill that connected his brain with his right arm and allowed him to do things on a pool table that were extraordinary, even to other great players. Denny Searcy was another savant playing pay ball on a snooker table. He could shoot a ball down the rail into the tiniest of pockets and make it. Good players would then attempt the same shot in practice with BIH and be unable to make it. Explain that please.
 
Last edited:
I did beat some good players but I was still not at their level. After I beat Jimmy Fusco at the Stardust he came to L.A. and gave me 8-7 and beat me gambling. I would never have been as good a player as Jimmy no matter how much coaching and practice I had. Bottom line, he had more ability at pool then I did. At least I was smart enough to realize that.

The way we got mentored back then was to watch and observe good players, particularly ones whose style was similar to your own. I used to say that getting better at pool was half practice and half watching good players. You can learn a lot if you're paying attention! I still say that works pretty well today.

As far as your observations about the learning process in school or otherwise. There is something called Intelligence Quotient or IQ. Some people are blessed with a higher IQ and learn more quickly than others not so blessed. Yes, the Montessori school way of learning is a good one, but it won't make a "slow" kid as smart as a very bright one.

We are not all equally blessed as human beings. Some can jump higher and run faster and some will be scientists and inventors. Then there are some who can make a few more shots on a pool table than just about anyone else. And that's a fact Jack!

Well we can agree to disagree. Science disagrees with you as well. Thank goodness because Einstein was considered to be stupid by his teachers.
 
Don't forget the old man in Northern California if you get up this way.

Would enjoy playing you, win or lose.

Sure thing John. If Lou does not make me quit pool I will be ready to play you.





Notable savants[edit]
The following are well-known people with savant syndrome, noted for their talent in their identified fields:
Tom Wiggins, blind American pianist and composer
Alonzo Clemons, American clay sculptor[18]
Tony DeBlois, blind American musician[18]
Jason Hughes, English sociologist[19]
Leslie Lemke, blind American musician[18]
Jonathan Lerman, American artist[18]
Derek Paravicini, blind British musician[20]
Anthony Torrone, American Christian writer[21][22]
Gilles Tréhin, artist, author[23]
James Henry Pullen, gifted British carpenter[24][25]
Matt Savage, American autistic jazz prodigy[26][27]
Henriett Seth F., Hungarian autistic savant, poet, writer, and artist[28]
Stephen Wiltshire, British architectural artist[29]
Richard Wawro, British artist[18]
George and Charles Finn, calendar calculator twins[30][31]
Florence 'Flo' and Katherine 'Kay' Lyman, calendar calculator twins[32]
Daniel Tammet, British author[33]
Rex Lewis-Clack, blind American pianist
Jason Padgett, obtained fractal drawing skills following a mugging incident.[34][35]
Kim Peek, American "megasavant" with exceptional memory

Some people are just wired different. And people like us who believe we can get there with them with better information and more hard work are just mad at our money...lol

No doubt. Wired is actually an apt description. It is how neurons and synapses work that determines how much cognitive ability a person has.

Of course there are prodigies and outliers. There are also hundreds of thousands of stories of people who worked their ass off to reach world class level.

Anyway, anyone who suggests that an average player can't get a lot better with focused and deep practice is simply wrong in my opinion. And my opinion isn't just based on my experience bit also on the hundreds of studies that prove it.
 
Well we can agree to disagree. Science disagrees with you as well. Thank goodness because Einstein was considered to be stupid by his teachers.

I would like to know what science books your reading
Please tell me why the examples I have given you that those people did not overcome their deficiencies with all the practice and finest teaching in the world ,, these are examples of not players trying to reach the top tier of there piers but instead just a acceptable level with neither did

The fact of the matter is the only place god created everyone equal is in the bible


1
 
Last edited:
Well we can agree to disagree. Science disagrees with you as well. Thank goodness because Einstein was considered to be stupid by his teachers.

I don't know about the "science" part of it, but I will grant you one thing. Hard work and dedication has it's rewards. There have been countless stories of great athletes who were not nearly as gifted as their contemporaries, but persevered and even excelled in their respective sport.

Without single mindedness and strong motivation it would be hard to make it to the major leagues in any sport. Some very good athletes have fallen by the wayside because they didn't have what it takes to get there. And some lesser athletes have had good careers because they were willing to make the necessary sacrifices to get to the top. In pool the first player that comes to mind for me is Nick Varner. He was the college champion when he came out on tour, but far behind the top players of his day. It literally took him years of hard work and determination to reach the top, but he did it. And what a great career he had.
 
Last edited:
Notable savants[edit]
The following are well-known people with savant syndrome, noted for their talent in their identified fields:
Tom Wiggins, blind American pianist and composer
Alonzo Clemons, American clay sculptor[18]
Tony DeBlois, blind American musician[18]
Jason Hughes, English sociologist[19]
Leslie Lemke, blind American musician[18]
Jonathan Lerman, American artist[18]
Derek Paravicini, blind British musician[20]
Anthony Torrone, American Christian writer[21][22]
Gilles Tréhin, artist, author[23]
James Henry Pullen, gifted British carpenter[24][25]
Matt Savage, American autistic jazz prodigy[26][27]
Henriett Seth F., Hungarian autistic savant, poet, writer, and artist[28]
Stephen Wiltshire, British architectural artist[29]
Richard Wawro, British artist[18]
George and Charles Finn, calendar calculator twins[30][31]
Florence 'Flo' and Katherine 'Kay' Lyman, calendar calculator twins[32]
Daniel Tammet, British author[33]
Rex Lewis-Clack, blind American pianist
Jason Padgett, obtained fractal drawing skills following a mugging incident.[34][35]
Kim Peek, American "megasavant" with exceptional memory

Some people are just wired different. And people like us who believe we can get there with them with better information and more hard work are just mad at our money...lol


I looked over your list multiple times, and I did not see a single pool player on there, and that's what the debate is about.

There is only factor that can't fully be taught or learned and could be lumped into the natural talent category. That is long term memory. The ability to retain the majority of information one has learned is an absolute must to be a world class pool player.

Everything else that makes up a world champion (stroke, performance under pressure, ball pocketing, position/safety play, etc.) can be improved with time spent at the table. That could include solitary practice/drills, and/or competitive play.

The fact is that there has never been a top pool player that just picked up a cue and was ready to give the rest of the world the 7.
 
I don't know about the "science" part of it, but I will grant you one thing. Hard work and dedication has it's rewards. There have been countless stories of great athletes who were not nearly as gifted as their contemporaries, but persevered and even excelled in their respective sport.

Without single mindedness and strong motivation it would be hard to make it to the major leagues in any sport. Some very good athletes have fallen by the wayside because they didn't have what it takes to get there. And some lesser athletes have had good careers because they were willing to make the necessary sacrifices to get to the top. In pool the first player that comes to mind for me is Nick Varner. He was the college champion when he came out on tour, but far behind the top players of his day. It literally took him years of hard work and determination to reach the top, but he did it. And what a great career he had.

A lot of people consider Corey to be a naturally gifted pool player.

Funny how he's an underdog to Shane, a guy that defines hard work and dedication in this sport.
 
I was once in the natural talent and limits camp just like you. But over time I have come to understand that it's a myth. The fact is that the only limits are physical ability and mental capacity.<--John, you would have given a major body organ to become a top player !

If so then please show me one world champion that didn't put the time in. Or show me one single person who did put the time in and didn't get to world class. You can't<--I can name you dozens--I'll just throw out a few "shortstops" you may recognize...Ronnie Allen, Richie Florence, Cole Dixon, Greg Stevens and Keith McCready !...They all HATED to practice, and usually ONLY played when they were in action !

Now show me any person who is world class who got there with less than deep practice for years. You can't.<--Same question John--Same answer !

If you're right then the fact of it is that there ought to be dozens of such examples of champions who didn't have to work AS HARD as their peers to reach championship level.<--Same question, same answer AGAIN !

But the facts show that ALL champions had to work as hard and the ones who did the best at championship level worked EVEN HARDER, doing more, going the extra distance, studying deeper than their peers. In short, what they displayed was a deeper DESIRE than their peers which then guided them to the greatest heights. <--Once again John, your whole concept is so WRONG, I'm getting bored answering you !

So along with the aiming system debate the talent vs. work debate will never die. It's much more romantic to believe that some people are just born to play pool and nothing else. <--"Romantic" ????..Now you are grasping at straws (AGAIN)

Some people are wired differently though, some are retarded and so they cannot ever reach the logical levels to play high level one pocket, some people are very intelligent and able to quickly recognize patterns and so they have a greater ability to play high level one pocket.<--You are getting warmer...(now I shall include myself)...Please give it up John, you are making a fool of yourself !

I was in G&T classes from sixth grade onward. I doubt very many here would consider me gifted or talented and for sure you and Dick and probably Jay consider me to be retarded. <--Bingo !--Finally, a statement we can ALL heartily agree with ! :thumbup:

John, it is obvious, you are never going to realize the truth in Jay's statement ! (re; shortstop status)...Keep trying though ! By the way, what was it you were you 'gifted and talented' AT ???...John, just thank the Good Lord, you didn't fall in love with BOXING or AUTO RACING !...:eek: :eek: :eek:

PS..Glad you didn't,...You are still here so, I can wish you a Merry Christmas ! :wink:
 
Last edited:
I looked over your list multiple times, and I did not see a single pool player on there, and that's what the debate is about.

There is only factor that can't fully be taught or learned and could be lumped into the natural talent category. That is long term memory. The ability to retain the majority of information one has learned is an absolute must to be a world class pool player.

Everything else that makes up a world champion (stroke, performance under pressure, ball pocketing, position/safety play, etc.) can be improved with time spent at the table. That could include solitary practice/drills, and/or competitive play.

The fact is that there has never been a top pool player that just picked up a cue and was ready to give the rest of the world the 7.

Nobody's doubting that performance can't be improved with practice. But there are limits in everybody. I was giving examples of people who are extra ordinary in what they do. That was the debate. Like the guy who can play any song on a piano perfectly by just hearing it one time. Hows that for long term memory! He don't need no stinking practice! Or Like Earl for example. I personally believe he just has that extra spark firing in his brain that other people don't. That's what makes him the best pure shot maker under pressure to ever live. Or like Effern or Cory, they have that unmatched of ability to create shots that nobody ever sees or thinks of. That's the natural ability i'm talking about that can't be taught or practiced.
 
A lot of people consider Corey to be a naturally gifted pool player.

Funny how he's an underdog to Shane, a guy that defines hard work and dedication in this sport.

Certainly your not suggesting Shane's not talented and that he's the only one that practices hard ,, he was beating world champion players who had several times the experience and table time he had many yrs ago


1
 
So you got to world class. Because if I recall you have beaten top pros in tournaments have you not?

I need to read your book again but I thought you always had some extra business going because you realized that the income was sporadic for a pool player. Am I wrong or was there a time when you practiced that much and were mentored by world class players?

I have beat lower end pro's and A players that I consider many time better than myself ,, I certainly would have never beat any of them in a TAR match

1
 
Certainly your not suggesting Shane's not talented and that he's the only one that practices hard ,, he was beating world champion players who had several times the experience and table time he had many yrs ago


1

And he's also much a much better player today than he was many years ago.

Hmmm...I wonder why. I'll give you a hint, it's not natural talent.

Maybe some of those "naturally gifted" players could compete with his break if they actually put the hours in practicing it like he does.
 
John, it is obvious, you are never going to realize the truth in Jay's statement ! (re; shortstop status)...Keep trying though, and just thank the Good Lord, you didn't fall in love with BOXING or AUTO RACING !...:eek: :eek: :eek:

PS..Glad you didn't,...You are still here so, I can wish you a Merry Christmas ! :wink:

your constant diahrea of the mouth towards john is getting old.

why don't you go back to posting pictures of you feeling up young ladies ? its kinda perverted... but more entertaining than this constant drivel you are spewing now.

oh yea ...MERRY CHRISTMAS TO YOU ALSO!!
 
A lot of people consider Corey to be a naturally gifted pool player.

Funny how he's an underdog to Shane, a guy that defines hard work and dedication in this sport.

Yes, and good for Shane, but who's saying he isn't also gifted in some way? Gets in the zone a little better than everybody else... And remember the names we are mentioning are on a very short list.
 
Tim Tebow, Vijay and Shaq are horrible examples if you are trying to disprove what Barton is saying.

What , those are perfect example ,, JB is of the opinion that the only thing that separates the best is hard work and practice ,,
he has even gone as far to say science backs that up ,, the only scientist who would back that up is some dork who could never play anything and was looking for a excuse why and distorted fact from fiction ,, and the only ones believing one word of it are people just like him



1
 
Back
Top