Well one of Stans videos shows him doing a straight in at a pocket then all of sudden he couldnt hit the same shot at a fake pocket.(how baffling )Like I said the pocket is needed.I mean, that is what he's saying, isnt it?
I actually created the word rite.It just didnt make sense to use the same right as in Im turning right as your right.Rite just sounds more appropiate.:grin: Btw Rite is a word.
No he says that the system works for the straight in to the side but the same line up becomes a bank if moved down table. That's called a phenomena. An event that is unexplainable with current knowledge. Regardless it works just exactly as Stan shows it.
The question is why? Stan thinks he knows, he is certainly closer to the subject and has more table time with it than any other living human I'd guess.
This is the whole basis of your beef with him isn't it?
So for that you are willing to throw out everything else? To discredit and disregard all the examples given?
Ask yourself this.....two questions......
1. if Stan didn't show the fake pocket video then what?
2. Can you duplicate the results he got on all the other videos? How much practice would you need to be able to bank 15 balls cross side one and two rails under a curtain?
For the record I am baffled by the fake pocket and I had an hour long discussion with Stan over it. There are some things about CTE that don't make sense on the surface but do in fact work as demonstrated. However it happens the perceptions as described connect to the pockets, or as Stan puts it to the right angles. Now you can say whatever you want but the proof is there. The phenomena exists. In order to use a hammer I don't need to know the physics that govern the hammer, only that someone somewhere else figured out the right balance and shape and weight for me to have a tool that works perfectly for driving nails.