How beneficial is an aiming system?

[nobcitypool]

For all the people out there that say they use CTE on every shot, and CTE is suppose to bring you to center pocket how do you do make a shot when the pocket is blocked by another ball. I am talking when you need to come off the rail then carom off the blocking ball to pocket the ball? Surely you can't make the ball go to a spot on the rail because CTE takes everything to the pocket.

The rest of your post was such nonsense, I didn't bother quoting it.

Of course, with the English applied to the CTE aimed shot, it will masse around the ball that is blocking the path to the pocket. Since you've obviously figured everything else out so perfectly, I'm surprised you missed that one. Soon, Stan is going to be doing a YouTube Video on the CTE Jump Shot. You pivot vertically and it put a magic spin on the CB that will cause the OB to jump over balls in the path to the pocket. Dude, that's not only connecting to the table Geometry, that's connecting to the Table Trigonometry!

Stay tuned.

 

[stan shuffett]

Take whoever you want that is a Real CTE (whatever Real means from Stan's wording) Pro One player and get them off their table. Come hit on my 8 foot Olhausen, or any table that isn't there own. I will place the cue and object balls on the table, and give them six shots, one for each pocket and lets see how many pockets they can hit the object ball into. You only get one chance per pocket, and you have to call it, just like in a real game, where you only get one shot.

What percentage can you make?

Ok it isn't a big enough sample. Lets do it 100 times from different positions so you are not playing the same shot twice. What percentage do you make?

He/she should make them all since the are "Geometrically connected", but are they really? I would say not if you are applying english to make them. Would it be geometrically connected if I hit the cueball straight into a rail and it came off the rail to the left, because I use left hand spin? No. Geometrically connected would bring the ball right back to me in a straight line.

For all the people out there that say they use CTE on every shot, and CTE is suppose to bring you to center pocket how do you do make a shot when the pocket is blocked by another ball. I am talking when you need to come off the rail then carom off the blocking ball to pocket the ball? Surely you can't make the ball go to a spot on the rail because CTE takes everything to the pocket.

You take the prize for understanding the least about what CTE is all about.

Stan Shuffett

 

[JB Cases]

lol, but to add to your comparison...

There is a door which some people claim has a million dollars on the other side of it. A man is in front of the door selling tickets (DVDs and lessons if you will) which you can purchase to have a chance at opening the door. Now if you think this scheme is nonsense and there is as much chance at finding a million dollars behind the door is as likely as finding it behind any door, behind doors which are free to open, isn't it right to tell those blindly handing this man $20 dollars a time to open the door and look behind it?

It's not about holding people back. It's about exposing fantasy.



I do think your comparison works well on one level, though. It reflects one of the biggest issues with American pool. In this game there are no magic doors with a million dollars behind them. In spite of what many people want to believe and in spite of what many others want to sell you, they just don't exist. There's no easy trick to finding that million dollars. In pool, much like in the real world, you just have to get on the table and earn it.

No tricks, no tonics, no systems. Just talent, time and practice. But people here don't want to hear that.

What's the old saying, give a man a fish and he will eat for a day but teach him to fish then he will eat for a lifetime?

You are upset because someone is charging a small amount for fishing lessons that WILL provide a lifetime of food. Do you think everyone should give away their work and their knowledge for free as well?

Here is the thing, this very same criticisms have been around long before anyone was charging for the knowledge. Hal Houle would give it away for free over the phone or in person. When Stan SELLS a DVD you get pretty much lifetime support as he will spend as much time on the phone with you as is needed to clarify anything you don't understand.

The only fantasy is the one you all have concocted about how something you don't even use or understand does not work as stated. in fact fantasy is defined as dreaming about the unknown and concocting scenarios that you wish would be true but have no basis in fact.

You all ask for evidence and when it is given in the form of testimonials and videos you pooh-pooh that and stick to your fantasy that all those folks who are testifying to the improvement in lining up and pocketing balls are simply self-delusional. Instead of simply allowing people to try these methods and report on them unmolested you instead try to PREVENT them from trying in the first place and then if they happen to ignore your advice and do try them you then molest them by calling them liars, delusional, religious nuts etc...when they report success.

But just a moment.......

IF a person buys the information and reports that they did not have success, did not understand the material and now considers it hokey then that person is lauded by you as a rational human and speaker of the truth.

Seems a bit silly if you ask me.

I could create two accounts and bust all the critics. One account would say they bought the dvd and was having great success and the other one would say they bought it and was not having any success. It would be hilarious to see your reactions to both accounts. Then after you made the no-success person a hero I would then have them say that they spent more time on it and figured it out based on paying closer attention to the presentation and now they are having great success. This just to watch you reverse your stance and now vilify your new hero.

 

[duckie]

Promoting a pool product is not the same as promoting pool.....there is a difference. Prompting a pool product is all that is being done.

 

[JB Cases]

Take whoever you want that is a Real CTE (whatever Real means from Stan's wording) Pro One player and get them off their table. Come hit on my 8 foot Olhausen, or any table that isn't there own. I will place the cue and object balls on the table, and give them six shots, one for each pocket and lets see how many pockets they can hit the object ball into. You only get one chance per pocket, and you have to call it, just like in a real game, where you only get one shot.

What percentage can you make?

Ok it isn't a big enough sample. Lets do it 100 times from different positions so you are not playing the same shot twice. What percentage do you make?

He/she should make them all since the are "Geometrically connected", but are they really? I would say not if you are applying english to make them. Would it be geometrically connected if I hit the cueball straight into a rail and it came off the rail to the left, because I use left hand spin? No. Geometrically connected would bring the ball right back to me in a straight line.

For all the people out there that say they use CTE on every shot, and CTE is suppose to bring you to center pocket how do you do make a shot when the pocket is blocked by another ball. I am talking when you need to come off the rail then carom off the blocking ball to pocket the ball? Surely you can't make the ball go to a spot on the rail because CTE takes everything to the pocket.

I will let Stan take that bet. With the caveat that you do the same shots on your table at the same time.

I will bet whatever you want that Stan's make percentage on the 100 shots is WAY higher than yours.

Furthermore I will bet that his miss window is way smaller than yours. In other words the shots that Stan misses will miss by far less margin than your missed shots.

Regarding your question about CTE and blocking balls. Simple, CTE isn't used for that shot. If there is a block to the pocket then obviously no method of aiming that would be used to make the object ball directly into a pocket can be used because the object ball cannot be made directly into a pocket. That is when you would choose another path such as a carom or a combination or a bank and use whatever method of aim you are able to use. Are you and Duckie the same person?

When someone says they use CTE on every shot they mean every shot to a pocket. No need to be super nitty here.

But for real you can get action betting against Stan on shot making. I challenged him for more than an hour setting up shots to see if he really could unlock the shots and he can. It's mind blowing when you see it in person and even more mind blowing when you learn how to do it. Luckily I had a witness with me, a very good player from Germany who saw it all, every minute.

We challenged Stan with just about every shot we could think of and I think that there was only one or two shots that didn't have a CTE aiming solution. What did Stan do for those shots? He worked out all the CTE aims that would get close and then added the necessary amount of speed and spin based on his experience and judgement to make the shot.

You all make think that this is all a big joke. It's not. If you hold a gun to my head and ask me to tell you anything differently I will not because it's 100% true. I spent four days at Stan's house and everything he has said on this forum about what CTE/ProOne does is 100% true. I would have no problem betting every penny I could put my hands on that Stan could demonstrate this to the satisfaction of an impartial jury.

I would allow you to pick out every claim about how the system works that you can prove came from Stan and he will demonstrate the physical proof on the table in front of a panel of judges. You cannot win.

When I was there I played devil's advocate and hammered Stan with every argument that has ever been presented here. I quoted Pat Johnson, I quoted Lou Figueroa, I quoted PoliteSniper, I quoted Dr. Dave....I was an asshole about it because I wanted to be able to defend this CTE/ProOne properly wherever I went. My thinking was that if Stan could not provide on-table proof of concept then I would not be pushing or defending CTE any longer.

You all think that some of us have no damn brain and can't think for ourselves. You think that we have swallowed some BS and are irrationally convinced that something works which in your opinion does not and cannot work. You think that none of us have thought deeper about and that we haven't considered your arguments. That's not only disrespectful it's irrational to think that. Why would you think that a diverse group of people who are only connected by their pool hobby would all suddenly go "nuts" over a damn aiming method to the point that they, being otherwise successful and rational people, would be so out of touch as to spend gobs of energy defending a method that has no merit.

Instead you should be thinking, well if all these people who are otherwise normal and successful in their lives are saying it's helping them then perhaps it's worth investigating and trying.

Anyway, any time you are ready to bet on a shot making contest with Stan count me in and please let me get in on the action. There are very few people on the planet that can really hang with Stan in this contest and it's certainly not average bangers on AZB who don't know or use Stan's methods.

 

[BeiberLvr]

Promoting a pool product is not the same as promoting pool.....there is a difference. Prompting a pool product is all that is being done.

Have you been working on not getting a ball to roll off without adjusting your aim?

 

[robsnotes4u]

Funny

Did I say anywhere that I could out shoot Stan? I think not. I wasn't a question if he was better than me. It is a question of what percent he makes in one try?

I guess I use an aiming system to make the shot blocking the pocket, it is a contact point of the ghost ball on the felt aimed to a point on the rail that will drive the object ball off the cushion to carom off the blocker ball into the pocket.

Isn't it funny how all the systems out there, the only one that gets this much slack is CTE pro one?

Keep doing what you are doing, if it works for you great, but don't expect people to all jump on board do to faith.

I will let Stan take that bet. With the caveat that you do the same shots on your table at the same time.

I will bet whatever you want that Stan's make percentage on the 100 shots is WAY higher than yours.

Furthermore I will bet that his miss window is way smaller than yours. In other words the shots that Stan misses will miss by far less margin than your missed shots.

Regarding your question about CTE and blocking balls. Simple, CTE isn't used for that shot. If there is a block to the pocket then obviously no method of aiming that would be used to make the object ball directly into a pocket can be used because the object ball cannot be made directly into a pocket. That is when you would choose another path such as a carom or a combination or a bank and use whatever method of aim you are able to use. Are you and Duckie the same person?

When someone says they use CTE on every shot they mean every shot to a pocket. No need to be super nitty here.

But for real you can get action betting against Stan on shot making. I challenged him for more than an hour setting up shots to see if he really could unlock the shots and he can. It's mind blowing when you see it in person and even more mind blowing when you learn how to do it. Luckily I had a witness with me, a very good player from Germany who saw it all, every minute.

We challenged Stan with just about every shot we could think of and I think that there was only one or two shots that didn't have a CTE aiming solution. What did Stan do for those shots? He worked out all the CTE aims that would get close and then added the necessary amount of speed and spin based on his experience and judgement to make the shot.

You all make think that this is all a big joke. It's not. If you hold a gun to my head and ask me to tell you anything differently I will not because it's 100% true. I spent four days at Stan's house and everything he has said on this forum about what CTE/ProOne does is 100% true. I would have no problem betting every penny I could put my hands on that Stan could demonstrate this to the satisfaction of an impartial jury.

I would allow you to pick out every claim about how the system works that you can prove came from Stan and he will demonstrate the physical proof on the table in front of a panel of judges. You cannot win.

When I was there I played devil's advocate and hammered Stan with every argument that has ever been presented here. I quoted Pat Johnson, I quoted Lou Figueroa, I quoted PoliteSniper, I quoted Dr. Dave....I was an asshole about it because I wanted to be able to defend this CTE/ProOne properly wherever I went. My thinking was that if Stan could not provide on-table proof of concept then I would not be pushing or defending CTE any longer.

You all think that some of us have no damn brain and can't think for ourselves. You think that we have swallowed some BS and are irrationally convinced that something works which in your opinion does not and cannot work. You think that none of us have thought deeper about and that we haven't considered your arguments. That's not only disrespectful it's irrational to think that. Why would you think that a diverse group of people who are only connected by their pool hobby would all suddenly go "nuts" over a damn aiming method to the point that they, being otherwise successful and rational people, would be so out of touch as to spend gobs of energy defending a method that has no merit.

Instead you should be thinking, well if all these people who are otherwise normal and successful in their lives are saying it's helping them then perhaps it's worth investigating and trying.

Anyway, any time you are ready to bet on a shot making contest with Stan count me in and please let me get in on the action. There are very few people on the planet that can really hang with Stan in this contest and it's certainly not average bangers on AZB who don't know or use Stan's methods.

 

[JB Cases]

Promoting a pool product is not the same as promoting pool.....there is a difference. Prompting a pool product is all that is being done.

Wrong. Promoting a method that increases skill is promoting pool. Anything that gets people to play more is promoting pool. Anything that increases the enjoyment of playing pool is promoting pool.

A method of playing is not a product. CTE/ProOne is a method. It's knowledge. A product is a thing like your Arrow or any other of the dozens of Ghost Ball trainers out there.

All these are products designed to help you do something that the "book" says you should be able to imagine. Including the arrow template you espouse. I would bet Babe Cranfield never used the arrow in his life.

This on the other hand is a set of master keys to unlock any shot without the need for any extra devices.

http://www.justcueit.com/First CTE Video.html

The product here is an accumulation of knowledge. Knowledge that once passed on increases the skill of the receiver. This isn't done to make huge profits it's done to transfer the knowledge from a person who developed the methods to people who don't have this knowledge.

Just because you don't want it doesn't mean you should spend your energy trying to stop others from acquiring it. You should be spending your time practicing with your arrow so that someday you can demonstrate the skill you have gained using your aiming template.

Bruce Lee would be very upset with the way you put down other people's methods.

 

[SakuJack]

The second count is that no one who teaches aiming systems has claimed it's any kind of magic cure, magic door, instant transport to professional status etc.... no one who uses them has claimed that. What has been said is that these methods are a different way of staring down the shot and that this way leads to more consistent shot making IF the fundamentals and other aspects of the game are solid. What has been said is that these methods require practice to become familiar and comfortable in their use.

People like you, Thaiger, Banks, VoiceofReason, Lou and a few others continually twist this around as if someone is selling snake oil. The only reason that anyone is actually even selling dvds and books on aiming is because they spent time putting that knowledge into those formats and would like to at the least break even on the costs. The only reason a CTE dvd exists at all is because of the snake-oil accusations that have been leveled.

What's funny is that you all want to have it both ways.

Hmmm, this is from your JB Cases blog, about your introduction to aiming systems:

"Hal shows me about a half-dozen systems and one of them makes enough sense to me that I am able to address the ball as he instructs. I set up and shoot and bam the ball hits the heart of the hole like a rifle shot. I am actually startled by it. And what I mean is I am startled by how CLEAN the ball went in and the sound it made. Almost like I had never heard that sound before.

So I set it up again and shot it again – CRACK – same thing. So I tried other shots, with similar results. Some I missed but it was because I was hesitating to pull the trigger because my brain was screaming WRONG WRONG WRONG. In other words my brain was telling me to line up differently than what Hal's system was giving me. And when I let go and just forced myself to pull the trigger on the line Hal's method gave me then the object ball split the pocket.

To say I was amazed and utterly confused at the same time would be an understatement. I didn't understand why or how this strange method would even work. On the other hand I couldn't wait to take it to the table in real competition and drill someone."

http://jbcases.com/caseblog/2010/12/15/recommendations-2/

"People like you... continually twist this around as if someone is selling snake oil." - John Barton

Well, quite.



EDIT: Actually, I'm not sure if you're even the author there. But the point stands, this:

The second count is that no one who teaches aiming systems has claimed it's any kind of magic cure, magic door, instant transport to professional status etc.... no one who uses them has claimed that

Clearly isn't a true statement.

 

[JB Cases]

Did I say anywhere that I could out shoot Stan? I think not. I wasn't a question if he was better than me. It is a question of what percent he makes in one try?

I guess I use an aiming system to make the shot blocking the pocket, it is a contact point of the ghost ball on the felt aimed to a point on the rail that will drive the object ball off the cushion to carom off the blocker ball into the pocket.

Isn't it funny how all the systems out there, the only one that gets this much slack is CTE pro one?

Keep doing what you are doing, if it works for you great, but don't expect people to all jump on board do to faith.

So if you're not better than the guy you criticize how can you justify criticizing his methods?

I thought you meant the pocket was fully blocked. If the ball can be made off a cushion then it's EASY to use CTE, simply sight the shot as if the blocking ball is not there and make a teeny conscious adjustment to the side needed and you are sitting perfect to make the ball. Actually this applies for a lot of shots.

One awesome thing for me about using CTE is that I am no longer scared of shots where the pocket appears to be blocked by an interfering ball. Using CTE to line up gives me the confidence to ignore the other balls. As a result I can now shoot into tighter spaces where previously I would either hit the interfering balls or adjust too wide and miss the pocket. Now I line up with CTE and fire it in. That's my personal experience.

Also no expects anyone to jump in on faith. Where do you people come up with this shit?

This is simple, it's a an OBJECTIVE way to aim using the balls in front of you. No hocus pocus, no believing in invisible gremlins, no click your heels three times, it's simply look here, do this, bend down, shoot straight. Is that super natural? No, it's simply a different method than what the "textbooks" have taught. Guess what, even textbooks get changed over time as new information is introduced.

To answer your question about percentages. It is my personal experience that make percentages on shots that have never been tried before are WAY higher with CTE/ProOne than with just feel/guessing.

I have shown this in person to many people. I showed it to a fireman in Sterling Virgina at The Break last week. He asked me about CTE and I gave him a primer and a demonstration. I set up an extremely tough shot to the side that I had never before attempted and nailed it three times in a row from slight different positions. I did it just to show him that CTE/ProOne has a set of OBJECTIVE instructions, I call them keys that can be used to unlock any shot. How effective those keys are depends on how focused and skilled you are in using them. Like anything else you can be sloppy in your approach and the results will likely be sloppy.

I was shown the value of precision down in New Orleans. When you approach this game with intense focus on precision in your actions the results are amazing. You gain the ability to make the ball do EXACTLY what you want on every shot. Not just ball park but exactly what you want. Now that level of precision also requires a high level of focus and practice to back it up.

So anyone who does any method half-assed will get less than half-assed results. But if you master it like Stan has done then people like me have no problem betting what you want on any type of shot making challenge on any pool table.

 

[JB Cases]

Hmmm, this is from your JB Cases blog, about your introduction to aiming systems:


"People like you... continually twist this around as if someone is selling snake oil." - John Barton

Well, quite.

Yes exactly, non-standard methods can be confusing. Especially if the student doesn't even want to be there.

I have told this story dozens of times but when Hal asked me to come to meet him I was not going there to learn anything about aiming I was using it as an excuse to play hooky from my shop and hopefully spend the day and night in action in Denver.

I had in the past peeked into the aiming threads on RSB, the dominant forum at the time, and just as quickly closed them thinking I already knew all I needed to about aiming. What I did NOT do was to put Hal down or argue against what he was teaching because I had enough sense to know that I couldn't argue against something I knew nothing about.

So when my friend Bob Johnson called me and said Hal is in Denver and wants to meet me I was totally surprised. I didn't know that he even knew who I was and I certainly didn't know much about him. But I figured what the hell go see what he wants, then play pool all night.

And when I got there I wasn't interested in anything this kooky guy had to say, still believing that I had aiming down well enough. I hoped for some action to walk through the door so I could politely disengage with Hal and go play pool. But no one came to rescue me so I resigned myself to try and listen to what he had to say.

The rest is history and I could not have been more wrong about my belief that ghost ball and repetition were the only things that a player needed to aim in pool.

 

[Neil]

Take whoever you want that is a Real CTE (whatever Real means from Stan's wording) Pro One player and get them off their table. Come hit on my 8 foot Olhausen, or any table that isn't there own. I will place the cue and object balls on the table, and give them six shots, one for each pocket and lets see how many pockets they can hit the object ball into. You only get one chance per pocket, and you have to call it, just like in a real game, where you only get one shot.

What percentage can you make?

Ok it isn't a big enough sample. Lets do it 100 times from different positions so you are not playing the same shot twice. What percentage do you make?

He/she should make them all since the are "Geometrically connected", but are they really? I would say not if you are applying english to make them. Would it be geometrically connected if I hit the cueball straight into a rail and it came off the rail to the left, because I use left hand spin? No. Geometrically connected would bring the ball right back to me in a straight line.

For all the people out there that say they use CTE on every shot, and CTE is suppose to bring you to center pocket how do you do make a shot when the pocket is blocked by another ball. I am talking when you need to come off the rail then carom off the blocking ball to pocket the ball? Surely you can't make the ball go to a spot on the rail because CTE takes everything to the pocket.

I can't believe you really just wrote what you did. Sorry, but it really emphasizes that you don't know what you are talking about.

 

[JB Cases]

Clearly isn't a true statement.

Then please provide a quote that shows otherwise. I have certainly never said it. I have not seen Stan, Gerry or anyone else say it.

Maybe Hal said something like that way back in 1998 or something.....but no one in the past five years that I can remember has said it.

In fact the vast majority of statements from aiming system users and teachers has been the exact opposite.

So it seems as if you are clinging to some premise that is not even part of the platform, and actually never was.

 

[Neil]

Promoting a pool product is not the same as promoting pool.....there is a difference. Prompting a pool product is all that is being done.

It's not a product, it's KNOWLEDGE. Bet you have paid tens of thousands of dollars for knowledge, yet, you don't understand the difference between the two. You probably paid for that book that you learned to use your "arrow" from. And, you laud it as a great investment for your game. Yet, you are unable to see this as the same, paying for knowledge, because you have it stuck in your head that this is a product that claims instant pocketing ability. (which it isn't and doesn't). Maybe it's time to put your prejudices aside so you can see reality. All you and others like you are really doing is scoffing at others gaining new knowledge about the game.

It only showcases ignorance on your part, and highlights why you guys can't seem to improve at all.

 

[8pack]

Aiming systems are probably more benifical to better players.

That being said some aiming systems require to much to figure out in a process that should only take a few seconds once learned. Feedback from your routine is Essential ,you need to know why your missing.

If a persons routine puts them in a position where they can't tell if they're undercutting ,on the mark or over cutting the ball from the get go ,they'll have trouble getting better at pocketing balls.

 

[cookie man]

promoting a pool product is not the same as promoting pool.....there is a difference. Prompting a pool product is all that is being done.

arrow..........

 

[cookie man]

Additionally

Every pool player USE an aiming system, that's a fact!
let me give an example, coz some of you may think that an aiming system is comprised of pivot and contact points.

Efren Reyes, Does he use any aiming system? NO! but how do you explain he pockets ball perfectly and consistently? some would say he is gifted, or he just feel his way to the shot.... THAT's WRONG

yes he is GIFTED of course with the help of repetition and practice, he pockets balls consistently.

GIFTED is gifted no question, but FEEL?, FEEL is the product of Experience and repetitions.


The fact that some of the TOP players (whoever it is) that does not use a "known" aiming system looks at the object ball and align himself at the angle of the shot or feel it, is actually using an aiming system which is his own of course.

so is a "KNOWN" aiming system beneficial? YES.

Efren has stated he uses centers and edges. Not saying he uses CTE but I've seen him pivot on certain shots.

 

[robsnotes4u]

Adjustments

So if you're not better than the guy you criticize how can you justify criticizing his methods?

I thought you meant the pocket was fully blocked. If the ball can be made off a cushion then it's EASY to use CTE, simply sight the shot as if the blocking ball is not there and make a teeny conscious adjustment to the side needed and you are sitting perfect to make the ball. Actually this applies for a lot of shots.

One awesome thing for me about using CTE is that I am no longer scared of shots where the pocket appears to be blocked by an interfering ball. Using CTE to line up gives me the confidence to ignore the other balls. As a result I can now shoot into tighter spaces where previously I would either hit the interfering balls or adjust too wide and miss the pocket. Now I line up with CTE and fire it in. That's my personal experience.

Also no expects anyone to jump in on faith. Where do you people come up with this shit?

This is simple, it's a an OBJECTIVE way to aim using the balls in front of you. No hocus pocus, no believing in invisible gremlins, no click your heels three times, it's simply look here, do this, bend down, shoot straight. Is that super natural? No, it's simply a different method than what the "textbooks" have taught. Guess what, even textbooks get changed over time as new information is introduced.

To answer your question about percentages. It is my personal experience that make percentages on shots that have never been tried before are WAY higher with CTE/ProOne than with just feel/guessing.

I have shown this in person to many people. I showed it to a fireman in Sterling Virgina at The Break last week. He asked me about CTE and I gave him a primer and a demonstration. I set up an extremely tough shot to the side that I had never before attempted and nailed it three times in a row from slight different positions. I did it just to show him that CTE/ProOne has a set of OBJECTIVE instructions, I call them keys that can be used to unlock any shot. How effective those keys are depends on how focused and skilled you are in using them. Like anything else you can be sloppy in your approach and the results will likely be sloppy.

I was shown the value of precision down in New Orleans. When you approach this game with intense focus on precision in your actions the results are amazing. You gain the ability to make the ball do EXACTLY what you want on every shot. Not just ball park but exactly what you want. Now that level of precision also requires a high level of focus and practice to back it up.

So anyone who does any method half-assed will get less than half-assed results. But if you master it like Stan has done then people like me have no problem betting what you want on any type of shot making challenge on any pool table.

Oh, now I understand, you can adjust, whether it be subconsciously or consciously. The reality is you have no idea, nor do I or anybody else, what kind of subconscious adjustments your mind is making. Fact. You might think you are using something while you are not.

You subconscious, from all the shots you have ever taken, is constantly learning and calculating outcomes. Why did you miss once your subconscious knows the shot? Simple, your conscious mind is thinking one thing, and fighting that of the subconscious. You are trying to consciously shoot the shot and your subconscious tries to make a correction and you steer the shot.

When people believe somebody is an authority information bypasses the critical faculty of the mind like a hot knife through butter, hypnosis. Once that idea is planted in the mind, then it is reinforced, the power of compounding takes affect and each time the idea gets stronger and stronger. You believe no matter what proof is put in front of you as the critical faculty just kicks the idea to the curb because it doesn't fit your belief system.

Religion and doctors are great examples of this. There have been documented cases of people going to the doctor, told they have a few months to live, and in a few months they die. After the autopsy they have been found not to have the disease they were told they had. The mind believed it, coming from an authority and it happened.

You believed Hal Houle, or Stan are authorities. You went to one of them and made a shot, a simple cut in the corner. You have made this same shot hundreds of times, and your mind knows how it is done. You have a new idea in your head your subconscious is willing to accept because it came from an authority in your mind. Another simple shot is made, Bam, you increased the power of that original suggestion. You do it again and again with simple shots set up to make you succeed. Each time it strengthens every previous suggestion. The keep getting stronger and stronger, you now have a new belief, even though you are actually shooting shots with your subconscious that you have shot many times before. Now your conscious mind thinks it is something else.

Don't believe me? Sit with a hypnotist who is changing the belief system of a smoker. The smoker will give you a reason why they smoke. Their conscious decision why they smoke. Under hypnosis you will find their conscious decision is incorrect. The subconscious will probably say when I was in 8th grade I wanted to be in this crowd, they didn't accept me. I started smoking with them, and them became accepted. It made me feel good. All along they have been trying to quit because they think it is because they lost weight when they smoked or some other idiotic idea.

Do you really want to learn something, buy Hypnotherapy by Dave Elman. Find out the power of the mind, find out how come Mayo Clinic became so successful, it wasn't because of doctors.

 

[stan shuffett]

Oh, now I understand, you can adjust, whether it be subconsciously or consciously. The reality is you have no idea, nor do I or anybody else, what kind of subconscious adjustments your mind is making. Fact. You might think you are using something while you are not.

You subconscious, from all the shots you have ever taken, is constantly learning and calculating outcomes. Why did you miss once your subconscious knows the shot? Simple, your conscious mind is thinking one thing, and fighting that of the subconscious. You are trying to consciously shoot the shot and your subconscious tries to make a correction and you steer the shot.

When people believe somebody is an authority information bypasses the critical faculty of the mind like a hot knife through butter, hypnosis. Once that idea is planted in the mind, then it is reinforced, the power of compounding takes affect and each time the idea gets stronger and stronger. You believe no matter what proof is put in front of you as the critical faculty just kicks the idea to the curb because it doesn't fit your belief system.

Religion and doctors are great examples of this. There have been documented cases of people going to the doctor, told they have a few months to live, and in a few months they die. After the autopsy they have been found not to have the disease they were told they had. The mind believed it, coming from an authority and it happened.

You believed Hal Houle, or Stan are authorities. You went to one of them and made a shot, a simple cut in the corner. You have made this same shot hundreds of times, and your mind knows how it is done. You have a new idea in your head your subconscious is willing to accept because it came from an authority in your mind. Another simple shot is made, Bam, you increased the power of that original suggestion. You do it again and again with simple shots set up to make you succeed. Each time it strengthens every previous suggestion. The keep getting stronger and stronger, you now have a new belief, even though you are actually shooting shots with your subconscious that you have shot many times before. Now your conscious mind thinks it is something else.

Don't believe me? Sit with a hypnotist who is changing the belief system of a smoker. The smoker will give you a reason why they smoke. Their conscious decision why they smoke. Under hypnosis you will find their conscious decision is incorrect. The subconscious will probably say when I was in 8th grade I wanted to be in this crowd, they didn't accept me. I started smoking with them, and them became accepted. It made me feel good. All along they have been trying to quit because they think it is because they lost weight when they smoked or some other idiotic idea.

Do you really want to learn something, buy Hypnotherapy by Dave Elman. Find out the power of the mind, find out how come Mayo Clinic became so successful, it wasn't because of doctors.

Your TRUE COLORS are showing now!

Stan Shuffett

 

[Neil]

Oh, now I understand, you can adjust, whether it be subconsciously or consciously. The reality is you have no idea, nor do I or anybody else, what kind of subconscious adjustments your mind is making. Fact. You might think you are using something while you are not.

You subconscious, from all the shots you have ever taken, is constantly learning and calculating outcomes. Why did you miss once your subconscious knows the shot? Simple, your conscious mind is thinking one thing, and fighting that of the subconscious. You are trying to consciously shoot the shot and your subconscious tries to make a correction and you steer the shot.

When people believe somebody is an authority information bypasses the critical faculty of the mind like a hot knife through butter, hypnosis. Once that idea is planted in the mind, then it is reinforced, the power of compounding takes affect and each time the idea gets stronger and stronger. You believe no matter what proof is put in front of you as the critical faculty just kicks the idea to the curb because it doesn't fit your belief system.

Religion and doctors are great examples of this. There have been documented cases of people going to the doctor, told they have a few months to live, and in a few months they die. After the autopsy they have been found not to have the disease they were told they had. The mind believed it, coming from an authority and it happened.

You believed Hal Houle, or Stan are authorities. You went to one of them and made a shot, a simple cut in the corner. You have made this same shot hundreds of times, and your mind knows how it is done. You have a new idea in your head your subconscious is willing to accept because it came from an authority in your mind. Another simple shot is made, Bam, you increased the power of that original suggestion. You do it again and again with simple shots set up to make you succeed. Each time it strengthens every previous suggestion. The keep getting stronger and stronger, you now have a new belief, even though you are actually shooting shots with your subconscious that you have shot many times before. Now your conscious mind thinks it is something else.

Don't believe me? Sit with a hypnotist who is changing the belief system of a smoker. The smoker will give you a reason why they smoke. Their conscious decision why they smoke. Under hypnosis you will find their conscious decision is incorrect. The subconscious will probably say when I was in 8th grade I wanted to be in this crowd, they didn't accept me. I started smoking with them, and them became accepted. It made me feel good. All along they have been trying to quit because they think it is because they lost weight when they smoked or some other idiotic idea.

Do you really want to learn something, buy Hypnotherapy by Dave Elman. Find out the power of the mind, find out how come Mayo Clinic became so successful, it wasn't because of doctors.

Why is it so hard for some of you to simply READ what others write without looking for "key words" to dissect? Try re-reading what he said about "adjustments", it is totally different than what you are saying. You think you know what you are talking about, but you really don't because of the fact that you can't read a simple sentence and let it stand for what it says. You automatically have to put your own ideas into it and pollute it.