Ah, the escapist/evasive approach -- "read this thread and saw none of the aforementioned names posted in this thread." So, therefore, "name doesn't appear == they're not reading [humorous deduction especially with a thread name like 'The future of pool']."
So, if this is "only a forum" and really unimportant, why do those names have accounts here, and *are* found responding to threads where they feel they have to dispel inaccurate information, or where they feel their unique position affords them a response that will benefit the masses?
Funny, coming from someone who purports to be supporting pool and the pool industry in general, and sets the appearance that he's "doing something" by e.g. coming up with rules in his pool hall where making a ball after the break is unimportant, but yet *uses this forum* for advertising his No Conflict rules. I don't see you as an AZB club member. Buy a Club Membership, if you're going to advertise, if you want to support the very "just a forum" that you advertise in. Put a little meat behind that "invest your money" directive.
And, I'm especially enamored of the "not one ball was pocketed in this thread" response. That's just priceless. So in order for something to be done, a ball has to be pocketed at a table? Like nothing in pool happens with discussion? All those things that, e.g. Mark Griffin does, he *had* to be at a table pocketing balls?
And, the assumption from you that I'm not a person who already has done something for pool, and continually contributes in a different way.
Add all these things together, and you get arrogance of a caliber rarely seen, especially coming from someone that likes to throw that word at me.
You're just adorable, Paul.
-Sean