If anyone were to do a close-up inspection and side-by-side comparison of the Tournaments to the Super Pros after even one day of play, they would quickly and easily see the differences between the latest Duramith technology that Aramith has employed on the Tournaments to the older Super Pros or even the beautiful Brunswick Centennials.
Scuff marks and chalk marks that take a commercial ball polisher is all that one needs to keep those Pros looking new - while the Tournaments keep on blinding you with their sheen and give less skidding at the same time....a bonus you could say
I fully understand that if "looks" are important, by all means buy the less expensive Pros - but if performance AND looks make you work those balls like you truly own them, well then - there really is no option is there? IMO of course
On a side note, would anyone want a perfectly like-new and literally flawless side-by-side tested only set of Centennials for a mere $225 shipped?
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD