CTE PRO ONE Contrast with Quarters System

If you're talking about visually aligning the CB center with the OB edge (so one is directly behind the other in your sight), there is no change as the balls or your eyes move back or forward. The CTE line is constant, and if you're looking along it, so is your perspective relative to it.

Here's a couple of 3D diagrams to show what I mean. What am I misunderstanding?

pj
chgo

View attachment 39471

Those are nice edge to edge pictures.
 
No, as usual with your words, WRONG!!! Every advocate repeats what THEY'VE EXPERIENCED and understood at the table. Most people "get it". You obviously don't. Not surprised since I heard from people who know you that you can't pocket 3 balls in a row. Crooked stroke, crooked perspective, it obviously isn't for you. Go back to your "48 Years of experience using side spin". LMAO

No one that knows me knows who I am on AZB & only a very few even know that I am on AZB.

I've won the most run out award in every league that I've played & finished 2nd. for league MVP to a 'semi pro' every time too & that was in the Metropolitan New Orleans Area & not in a yellow blinking light one cross road town.

Making x balls in a row is not what it's about. Winning games etc, is what it's about.

No one knows what one is doing when one is on a table when they are on it by themselves. Unless someone has watched another actually compete they know nothing of another's game.

Does your last name begin with 'T'?
 
Last edited:
Your eyes must move to maintain an alignment due to convergence in real 3D space, not a 2D representation of 3D space.
I don't find any clear meaning in that assertion. How about expanding a bit so we know there's something behind it?

Oh right, you can't be bothered. My bad for asking.

pj
chgo
 
CTE users give the non-answers, not me. I ask clear questions to which there should be clear answers.

Are you saying it's your "true objective" to turn off potential CTE users? I'm joking, of course - it's pretty clear that CTE users believe the answers they give are sensible.

pj
chgo

No Patrick, CTE users aren't your lackeys. The answers to all your questions are available in the dvd's and Stan's youtube videos, you're simply to lazy to seek them out. If your agenda was anything but to disrupt and destroy, you'd simply look at the available sources. You're not fooling anyone.
 
Thanks for dropping by to remind us of that.

pj
chgo

If you could think for yourself, better yet, give your visual intelligence a good workout at a table with CTE PRO ONE, then you'd soon awaken something beyond math and language. But you won't allow yourself to do so.....Why... Because you are a CTE detractor and that will never change.

Stan Shuffett
 
PJ, when are you going to actually get on the table and make a video explaining each of Stan's steps as you set up and pivot back to center? It won't be a shooting contest to see how many balls you make or how good you are. You can do what you do best which is smack the ball into the rail and miss the shot regardless of what system you use. Then you can verbally explain on the video why it didn't work instead of this constant wordsmithing that you've done for the last 17 years and now with the 2D illustrations. Man up to the table and prove it incorrect on video. I can't wait for your usual brush offs and excuses.
 
Oh yeah, the other CTE meme answers. Thanks for reminding us of those old standards too.

pj
chgo

And thanks for the #1 PJ brushoff. This is all you have to worry about doing:

PJ, when are you going to actually get on the table and make a video explaining each of Stan's steps as you set up and pivot back to center? It won't be a shooting contest to see how many balls you make or how good you are. You can do what you do best which is smack the ball into the rail and miss the shot regardless of what system you use. Then you can verbally explain on the video why it didn't work instead of this constant wordsmithing that you've done for the last 17 years and now with the 2D illustrations. Man up to the table and prove it incorrect on video. I can't wait for your usual brush offs and excuses.
 
Oh yeah, the other CTE meme answers. Thanks for reminding us of those old standards too.

pj
chgo

I am fairly sure you are a contender for the weakest CTE student thus far for the most time put in. You are ground level and your other cohorts are huddling right there with you,
Saying what do we ask next?....and the play right out of the huddle is always the same....how do you see that!

If you'd work out your visual intelligence, which I doubt you even think that it exist, you'd bump up your perceptual skills at the table.

Stan Shuffett
 
Isn't video a 2D representation of the 3D real world, such that it cannot represent the true visual and physical intelligence and objectivity of CTE Pro 1?
 
Isn't video a 2D representation of the 3D real world, such that it cannot represent the true visual and physical intelligence and objectivity of CTE Pro 1?

At one time you did a good number of videos with solid explanations. Don't you think it conveyed knowledge and helped others? Some videos may also convey a lack of knowledge or understanding but I'm not referring to yours.
 
At one time you did a good number of videos with solid explanations. Don't you think it conveyed knowledge and helped others? Some videos may also convey a lack of knowledge or understanding but I'm not referring to yours.
Ok, I was jesting a bit Dave. Of course we can convey many aspects via video, and even CTE training videos attempt to do so. Though such videos can't show us a geometric line of aim, with any precision to its relation to CTE and ETX lines, it is still of use to proponents it seems.

Yet it's presented in 2D, which doesn't seem to concern anyone, until skeptics use a 2D representation in an attempt to convey their thoughts.
 
Last edited:
If you'd work out your visual intelligence, which I doubt you even think that it exist, you'd bump up your perceptual skills at the table.
I work on my "visual intelligence" all the time, Stan, I even learn it through practice and experience just as you say you do. Not only that, I also begin with a "master" alignment like CTE does with its CTE line and find my final aim "by feel" with that as a guide.

The only real difference I can see between what I do and how CTE works is that CTE's description of what's happening and how to do it are much harder to understand. I'd like to discuss and understand more clearly what the differences are, but apparently that's too difficult.

Thanks anyway,

pj
chgo
 
That spin ain't working Patrick. It's obvious to everyone you aren't sincerely interested in learning. Have a nice day.

Stop saying everyone. Im grateful for Stans hard work, butI I didnt spend 8 months learning cte to be part of the dumbest feud in history.

I dont care if they've asked the same questions over and over. As someone who had to work really hard to be able to use CTE, from an OBJECTIVE standpoint I've yet to read an adequate and satisfying response to any of these questions that doesnt require intense inside knowledge and study.

If you cant explain whatever concept you are defending in a way that a child could understand, you should spend less time being defensive and more time trying to figure out a better way of explaining it.

If you're just going to spend all your efforts spouting the same bullshit excuses we're never going to get anywhere. The only person I see doing any work is Stan, who despite all the naysayers, still puts out video after video in an attempt to help people.

Stop giving out information that only people who already know CTE will understand, and trying to hold it up as an adequate explanation for the rest of the general public.

It's not a requirement to be a mechanic for someone to be interested in buying a car.
 
Back
Top