"Tribute" cues? Seriously?

Question. Is Jerry building his Balabushka tributes using the same construction methods as GB or simply building cues that are similar in appearance?

Its just aesthetics. No one is using a lag/machine screw at the A joint.

JV
 
Thanks for the words on the Skip...

The propeller is a funny inlay. I know Gus was the first to bring the ivory version into cues, however the inlay has been a luthier staple since the first luthier catalogs. I found a Gibson hollow body 1950's and low and behold it has some props...

JV

OK Joe, and I agree. I do have a Szam "tribute" cue on my site that does not belong to me... just listing for my partner.

This topic always comes up from time to time, and there is always going to be people on both sides of the fence as you well know. My stance is simple... I think diamonds and dots, Hoppe cues, and the like are fair game because those elements have been widely accepted in the industry as standards. I do not mind cues that are "inspired" by other makers, but the inspiration needs to be built upon and the end result need to be unique.

I think a great example of that id the S. Weston cue you have built with the propeller and the frame behind it.

At the end of the day, I like to see cuemakers using their own imagination to create unique cues. That is what drives my passion for the craft.
 
Its just aesthetics. No one is using a lag/machine screw at the A joint.

JV

Correct. And I'll add to this. Jerry is using modern techniques, such as threading the buttcap, modern epoxies, modern clearcoat finish rather than laquer, just to name a few. I don't think anybody is truly doing it the way it was in the 60s and 70s anymore.
 
leto.....I don't know about you but these cues Jerry has released that are 360's and butterflies look creative......there's a couple of cues right now in the Gallery that belong to Big-Tatoo which look pretty original to me.......and there was also a 4 pointer that had butterflies that looked very different that he did for deanoc.....and his Bushka copies are dead on exact when you ask him to make a reproduction.....his points are the exact same length and width as George used.......the guy is a good cue-maker and when his customers refer to their cues as Tributes......that's just us talking, and it's not on behalf of Jerry Rauenzahn either. He's just a very good cue-maker, especially his full splice versions, doing what his customers request him to do. The wrapless full splice Mosconi cue in the Gallery is just a dandy and not a lot of cue-makers would make one as fine as that cue. So I respectfully disagree and there's lots of cue-makers that don't get the recognition they deserve and Rauenzahn just happens to be one of them......IMO.

Matt B.

First of all, you completely skirted my main point, which is: when was the last time an original -R- design was posted to this forum.

Secondly, get the F out of here with the B.S. In bold. This guy gets nothing but recognition and praise around here, not at all underserved, mind you, but don't try to act like he doesn't receive any. He has several cues in threads on the first two pages of the gallery forum, with two started by you,macho practically fellates him with words.
 
I've asked this before, but what do the cue maker associations decide on this subject. I mean, if a group of cue makers, American and Internationally, don't opine on the subject, then maybe best to leave it alone ? They're the ones that should have a standard or rule on the subject, no ?
 
You're not serious, are you? Why would they need to copy SW? Sorry, but it would be more accurate to say that most cue makers, at one time or another copied Brunswick/Rambow, including southwest, and still do to this day.

Absolutely... Southwest are a blatant copy of Kershenbrocks, whose plain Birdseye
cues were a blatant copy of a Martin. And, he stole Bert Schrager's 6 point design.

Dale
 
You are completely missing the point here.

This thread isn't about standard designs. It's about custom designs that have been/are being ripped off.

Obviously, a 4 point design with veneers and a Hoppe ring is something that's done by almost every cuemaker on earth. As are a lot of standard 6 point designs. When people start bringing up Southwest, I just laugh because they are basically just a production line cues now. There hasn't been a new unique design that has come out of that shop in how many years?

Sorry, this thread is about 'tribute' cues - many of which are not artsy.

Dale
 
Absolutely... Southwest are a blatant copy of Kershenbrocks, whose plain Birdseye
cues were a blatant copy of a Martin. And, he stole Bert Schrager's 6 point design.

Dale

Bert had the first 6-pointer ( staggered ) ?
 
From Bert Shrager's brochure. I see some that could have been six-pointers. But I don't see any staggered ones. No resemblance to SW, that I see. Just the facts, unless some produce others.
 
Absolutely... Southwest are a blatant copy of Kershenbrocks

So it seems you are not aware DPK helped Southwest get started and did inlay work for them. Therefore, SW not only had DPK's permission, he actually helped form the company. That is a completely different scenario than someone copying another's work.
 
Bert had the first 6-pointer ( staggered ) ?

I am not quite willing to bet my life on it, but that is what he told me circa 1978-ish.

He was trying to steer me away from ordering a 4 point. Come to think of it,
what I really wanted was a Bushca "Tribute" cue at the time:)

Dale
 
So it seems you are not aware DPK helped Southwest get started and did inlay work for them. Therefore, SW not only had DPK's permission, he actually helped form the company. That is a completely different scenario than someone copying another's work.

Actually, I am quite aware that Jerry was David's account who took over the cue
biz when David got sent away to 'summer camp' as I am sure you are too.

Next time I post an inside joke, perhaps I'll include a waving flag symbol:)

Dale
 
It was Bert Schrager. Richard Black took the exact design of two cues from Bert's catalog putting the buttsleeve of one cue and the forearm of the other to make "his" award winning cue. The thing that really sent Bert over the edge was that Richard placed a full page ad in the Billiard News thanking everyone that voted "HIS" design as 'Cue of the Year' or 'Best of Show'. If Richard would have mentioned that the design was inspired by Bert Schrager, that would have diffused everything, but he said "HIS" design. Uhg.

Bert was not at the cue expo that year and always felt that if he was, Richard would never have pulled out the cue let alone enter it in the contest. Bert never forgot about this till the day he passed...he is probably talking to anyone that will listen in the ever after.

I haven't thought about this for a few years but now that you brought it up and Bert cannot speak for himself, I couldn't help myself. I was very good friends w/Bert and heard about it from day one for many years.

Dave

Good point mr squared.

As it turns out, I was at that event. It was the first ever cuemakers asoc event in
Houston. Richard later joked about his win that he had the "home court advantage".

For those who may care.The prize winning cue had a forearm that looked like about
half a dozen points within points - a series of single mitered whitish veneers spaced
roughly equally nearly up to the joint.

As a side note, the judges, 3 or 4 I believe, had nothing to do with cues, or even pool.
IIRC there was a designer of some sort, a journalist(perhaps) and others.

As if the cue show weren't bad enough - Viking later offered the same design in their
line of not-exactly-high-quality cues.

Dale(good old days)
 
Well I guess according to what everyone is saying here...any cue with spliced points and veneers is a ripoff of the Brunswick design! Shame on you Joel, Barry, Ernie...and the rest of you ripoff artists! Worst yet are the cue makers like George, Gene, Hermann, and Frank who would actually use another makers cue like the Titlist to make a cue and call it their own. Despicable!
Tribute - a gift, testimonial, compliment, or the like, given as due or in acknowledgment of gratitude or esteem. No where in the definition of tribute does it mean to steal another's work or design!
 
JW copy ?

I had G.S. make me a box cue from JW brochure. Even sent him the
brochure. I asked him to make the bottom ivory with ebony inlays
instead of ebony with ivory inlays. When we talked about it the first
time he knew what cue I was talking about. When we talked again
he wanted to know the color of the veneers around the blocks. that's
when I sent him the brochure. I believe Dean (Deanoc) had it for a
while. I paid $600 for it then. I think it is worth a little more now.
This was definitely was not an industry standard. Does that make Gus
a rip off artist.
jack
 
Some years ago, when the BCA show was relevent, an Asian manufacturer had a full display of cues. Someone from Schon scooped up an arm full of selected cues, handed the booth operator a business card and told him to talk to Schon's lawyer if he had any problems with him taking them. I would say Clark feels he has a say about a knockoff of his designs.

I don't see how a product can have copyright protection without a copyright notice - something like a circle with a "c" in the middle and a date. Most manufactured items have have some sort of warning protection notice. I've seen many paintings with a "bug" for example.

Big Al
 
Some years ago, when the BCA show was relevent, an Asian manufacturer had a full display of cues. Someone from Schon scooped up an arm full of selected cues, handed the booth operator a business card and told him to talk to Schon's lawyer if he had any problems with him taking them. I would say Clark feels he has a say about a knockoff of his designs.

I don't see how a product can have copyright protection without a copyright notice - something like a circle with a "c" in the middle and a date. Most manufactured items have have some sort of warning protection notice. I've seen many paintings with a "bug" for example.

Big Al

The person "scooping" up cues is committing a felony, if he did not pay for them! If indeed there was copyright infringement, that IS a civil matter and would not prevent the "scooper" from being arrested and thrown in jail.
 
Back
Top