Question. Is Jerry building his Balabushka tributes using the same construction methods as GB or simply building cues that are similar in appearance?
Its just aesthetics. No one is using a lag/machine screw at the A joint.
JV
Question. Is Jerry building his Balabushka tributes using the same construction methods as GB or simply building cues that are similar in appearance?
OK Joe, and I agree. I do have a Szam "tribute" cue on my site that does not belong to me... just listing for my partner.
This topic always comes up from time to time, and there is always going to be people on both sides of the fence as you well know. My stance is simple... I think diamonds and dots, Hoppe cues, and the like are fair game because those elements have been widely accepted in the industry as standards. I do not mind cues that are "inspired" by other makers, but the inspiration needs to be built upon and the end result need to be unique.
I think a great example of that id the S. Weston cue you have built with the propeller and the frame behind it.
At the end of the day, I like to see cuemakers using their own imagination to create unique cues. That is what drives my passion for the craft.
Its just aesthetics. No one is using a lag/machine screw at the A joint.
JV
leto.....I don't know about you but these cues Jerry has released that are 360's and butterflies look creative......there's a couple of cues right now in the Gallery that belong to Big-Tatoo which look pretty original to me.......and there was also a 4 pointer that had butterflies that looked very different that he did for deanoc.....and his Bushka copies are dead on exact when you ask him to make a reproduction.....his points are the exact same length and width as George used.......the guy is a good cue-maker and when his customers refer to their cues as Tributes......that's just us talking, and it's not on behalf of Jerry Rauenzahn either. He's just a very good cue-maker, especially his full splice versions, doing what his customers request him to do. The wrapless full splice Mosconi cue in the Gallery is just a dandy and not a lot of cue-makers would make one as fine as that cue. So I respectfully disagree and there's lots of cue-makers that don't get the recognition they deserve and Rauenzahn just happens to be one of them......IMO.
Matt B.
..................
You're not serious, are you? Why would they need to copy SW? Sorry, but it would be more accurate to say that most cue makers, at one time or another copied Brunswick/Rambow, including southwest, and still do to this day.
You are completely missing the point here.
This thread isn't about standard designs. It's about custom designs that have been/are being ripped off.
Obviously, a 4 point design with veneers and a Hoppe ring is something that's done by almost every cuemaker on earth. As are a lot of standard 6 point designs. When people start bringing up Southwest, I just laugh because they are basically just a production line cues now. There hasn't been a new unique design that has come out of that shop in how many years?
Whoa there cowboy... Barry did not work with Gus. Not that it matters a whit.
Dale
Absolutely... Southwest are a blatant copy of Kershenbrocks, whose plain Birdseye
cues were a blatant copy of a Martin. And, he stole Bert Schrager's 6 point design.
Dale
Absolutely... Southwest are a blatant copy of Kershenbrocks
Bert had the first 6-pointer ( staggered ) ?
So it seems you are not aware DPK helped Southwest get started and did inlay work for them. Therefore, SW not only had DPK's permission, he actually helped form the company. That is a completely different scenario than someone copying another's work.
It was Bert Schrager. Richard Black took the exact design of two cues from Bert's catalog putting the buttsleeve of one cue and the forearm of the other to make "his" award winning cue. The thing that really sent Bert over the edge was that Richard placed a full page ad in the Billiard News thanking everyone that voted "HIS" design as 'Cue of the Year' or 'Best of Show'. If Richard would have mentioned that the design was inspired by Bert Schrager, that would have diffused everything, but he said "HIS" design. Uhg.
Bert was not at the cue expo that year and always felt that if he was, Richard would never have pulled out the cue let alone enter it in the contest. Bert never forgot about this till the day he passed...he is probably talking to anyone that will listen in the ever after.
I haven't thought about this for a few years but now that you brought it up and Bert cannot speak for himself, I couldn't help myself. I was very good friends w/Bert and heard about it from day one for many years.
Dave
Some years ago, when the BCA show was relevent, an Asian manufacturer had a full display of cues. Someone from Schon scooped up an arm full of selected cues, handed the booth operator a business card and told him to talk to Schon's lawyer if he had any problems with him taking them. I would say Clark feels he has a say about a knockoff of his designs.
I don't see how a product can have copyright protection without a copyright notice - something like a circle with a "c" in the middle and a date. Most manufactured items have have some sort of warning protection notice. I've seen many paintings with a "bug" for example.
Big Al