I appreciate C J's posts and contribution on AZ. I have also purchased his products and have found them informative, understandable, and will purchase more. Additionally, IMO his knowledge and approach would make him an excellent teacher/coach.
I do not understand those taking the time to spew negatives , unless they have value to add that is contradictory and they feel better advice. Under this scenario, the reader can determine what is best for their situation.
A great tutorial would be an instructional trip to Dallas and on to Phoenix if anyone would be inclined to instruct :smile::smile:
:thumbup2: Good Post.
Far too many, well maybe it is only a select few, but repetition makes it seem like far too many, attack the messenger rather than the message.
Some attack the message but really offer no real argument or counter measure. To me, that is often an attempted disguised attack of the messenger.
Some realize that this game is played with more than just the physicality of the physical sciences. That is because we are not machines & because we have minds both conscious & subconscious that come into play.
CJ Wiley is one of those individuals & probably the most prominent of that realm.
CJ has been studying the connections & how one might affect the other.
For most of us (can I use the word most without having statistical proof), The Game is a hobby, pass time, side line, passion, or a dream.
The Game was/is basically CJ's life's 'work'. I would guess that he has put in more time in all aspects of the game than 'most' of us.
It rather amazes me, well not really, how some are okay when a non literal analogy, 'like a pendulum', is made but then cry foul when other non literal analogies are made. That reeks of hypocrisy & ulterior motives.
Some of us know that true credentials are far more than what is represented by a piece of paper from an 'accrediting body', whether that body is appointed or self declared.
I am sure that there are some pros from whom I would not wish to take a lesson just as there are 'credentialed' instructors that I am sure I would not wish to take a lesson. I would certainly enjoy the opportunity to take a lesson from CJ Wiley.
Disagreeing with & discussing & 'arguing' against a procedure that another is putting forth is completely different than 'attacking' the messenger.
CJ has often said that if something he says does not register or fit an individual that individual should just put it aside as they may wish to revisit it at sometime in the future. He's also said what he is putting out probably will only register with about 37% of those playing the game.
CJ has helped my game & I certainly thank him for it. I guess I am one of that 37%.
I am rather sure that he can & will help the game of others as well.
Why anyone would want to try to stifle that makes no real sense to me other than they have some ulterior & probably selfish motive.
If one disagrees with something CJ puts out & sees it as possibly being harmful then explain that. There is no reason to attack the messenger if the messenger is well meaning. If the 'argument' is reasonable, I'd bet that CJ would give it its due credit.
Most of us here are adults & as such should be capable of making our own determinations. To do so, appropriately, we just need to hear both sides of a dispute. We do not need to hear derogatory & uncivil things about the messengers from either side of a disagreement. That is unless there are ulterior motives by some. Then, those are in play & should be pointed out for consideration by individuals to weigh if those motives could perhaps make the message invalid or not.
Sorry for the rant. It just seems that certain individuals come out & play follow the leader & hence the numbers of 'attacks' build up.
Again, Good Post by You & All the Best 2 You & Yours....& All,
Rick
