Well, I don't know about you guys, but I pride myself on my open mind and trying anything once. I've tried every aiming system there is, and almost every technique that I've seen described on Azb. I'm not going to lie to you, some of it was pure bullshit, but politics and forum etiqette prevents me from really conveying what I feel about them. Nobody will post a video of this techique up close, so I had to test the hammer grip for myself, more thoroughly than before. After reading this thread again (not all of it, but CJ's post and some others) I gave the hammer grip/technique another try today.
I must say I'm a bit baffled by people's reluctance to even try something they have such strong opinions about? It's not hard drugs people, you can stop after the first try.
I understand that not everybody wants to shell out 80 dollars for a DVD or whatever, but for something that's free, I don't really see the harm.
For both techniques I find them easier to do while relaxed in both the hand and arm, at least at first.
First the hammer/tennis racket grip: This grip achieves good control of cue direction, due to the cue lying in a grove in the hand. The stroking action itself is not a pendulum, but more of a piston action. It definitely worked best for me when the forarm is forward of perpendicular at contact. Does it work? Yes, surprisingly well, given that it is a relatively new stroke for me. It definitely worked best with a relaxed but firm grip pressure and any attempt at a death grip seemed to make it less precise. It was perfectly possible to perform in a snooker stance, which is a plus.
The hammer action is definitely a real thing. I wonder if any of the detractors actually tried it, and if so, what exactly they did? My problems occured I think because I focused on the wrist instead of the fingers. I worked best for me when I didn't cock the wrist forward all the way, but kept it in a more neutral position. As I bring the cue forward I squeeze the cue with my fingers starting from the thumb/index finger and in a wave moving backwards (in seqence from the index to the pinky). It works best if you let the finger action pull the cue forward, instead of trying to pull the cue forward with the arm and then "slapping on" the finger action at the end. The wrist will automatically cock backward for me without any thought. This will accellerate the cue, but having girly wrists and slender fingers (for a guy) I didn't get much benefit from it. Someone with strong fingers will probably get more out of it.
In summary:
Hammer grip + Good control of cue direction, can easily be made quite smooth with little practice
Hammer grip - Not a pendulum stroke (so you will need some pracise with it if that is what you are used to), Cue position best forward of perpendicular (might need some stance adjustments), To me it seems to "deaden" the ball action a bit, that might not be the case, but the feel is definitely different from a normal stroke
Hammer action + Does seem to boost cue speed a bit (might be a lot if you are strong), Good for rail shots, because it puts pressure downward it lessens the chance of a miscue.
Hammer action - Harder to keep cue in groove, Cue will dip more downward with more pressure on the bridgehand (if your bridgehand isn't solid that might be a minus, for shots from the rail, it's a plus), Harder to keep action smooth. For me it tends to "jerk" the cue a bit. Might be lack of practice.
This was my attempt at an honest and fair review, and should be seen as such, not as an attack or an infomercial. You are welcome to criticise it as you please. Just FYI i will stick to my regular technique...