Millions of Views!!!!

[JB Cases]

While the same 14 people argue incessantly here - poisoning every discussion with their negativity.....on YouTube the positive people who only want to help people play better pool are straight up winning.

Today at the TAP Nationals I have had no less than five people come up just to say thanks for my videos on CTE.

So to all the positive people who take the time to do videos and show the world the power of Center to Edge aiming. Your efforts are working big time, don't be discouraged by the knockers here on AZB. They are truly, and I mean TRULY, inconsequential in the face of the positive effect you are having on pool players around the world who want to learn to aim better.

And this goes for all of you who make similar videos about playing better pool and aiming better...for any method!!!

 

[ENGLISH!]

John,

Millions, plural, that means at least 2 million views & you show one positive comment.

Does that mean that the other 1,999,999 were negative?

Just kidding, but also making a point.

A view does not mean anything. I looked at your videos & Stan's too.

Best Wishes.

PS IF AZB is so insignificant, why are you pushing it so hard on AZB?

PPS I'm not trying to 'knock' or stop anything. I & others just give the other side to the claims being made with which we disagree based on what is simple common sense. That way everyone can hear both sides & make their own determinations

Again, Best Wishes.

 

[JB Cases]

I just like to see you respond. I take bets on your word count.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-N900A using Tapatalk

 

[ENGLISH!]

I just like to see you respond. I take bets on your word count.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-N900A using Tapatalk

Pick a number & take the over on the bet but don't ever go as high as 2 million.:wink:

 

[Ron Swanson]

While the same 14 people argue incessantly here - poisoning every discussion with their negativity.....on YouTube the positive people who only want to help people play better pool are straight up winning.

Today at the TAP Nationals I have had no less than five people come up just to say thanks for my videos on CTE.

So to all the positive people who take the time to do videos and show the world the power of Center to Edge aiming. Your efforts are working big time, don't be discouraged by the knockers here on AZB. They are truly, and I mean TRULY, inconsequential in the face of the positive effect you are having on pool players around the world who want to learn to aim better.

And this goes for all of you who make similar videos about playing better pool and aiming better...for any method!!!

Proof that systems are for people with no natural aptitude for the game.

I think that's great.

 

[Ron Swanson]

PS IF AZB is so insignificant, why are you pushing it so hard on AZB?

It is because he's 'too busy' to do it on other sites, where real players go.

 

[mohrt]

Proof that systems are for people with no natural aptitude for the game.

I think that's great.

Really, then why would any one take a lesson from a professional instructor for any game? I mean if you can't do it all on your own you must be inept? Aiming systems are a tool to get you to where you want to go. Same with banking systems, kicking systems, diamond systems, etc. You can learn methodically and systematically, or purely by years of hitting a million balls. It's a choice, not an aptitude issue.

 

[JB Cases]

Proof that systems are for people with no natural aptitude for the game.

I think that's great.

Maybe, if so then it is even better. When people who truly have no "natural" aptitude for pool find ways that they can use to learn how to play and increase their enjoyment it is only positive for the game as a whole.

I mean if it were up to the snobs who think pool is only for so-called natural talents then pool would be super dead.

Today I am at the TAP nationals and it is FULL of people who are having a great time playing. They enjoy learning and getting better.

Sometimes I think some of the knockers on here have never in their life had a good time playing pool. Sad really.

And yes, I am too busy to spend time on the Snooker forum. I see no point to it when there are millions of people here in the USA to talk pool with.

And millions who enjoy the great amount of helpful videos on pool. So again to those of you who take the time to create those videos thank you. You're doing great and the knockers here are nothing but fleas.

And Rick; I am not "pushing" CTE hard on AZB. I mention it when it is relevant to the conversation. Also I didn't say that the membership on AZB is not significant. I said the KNOCKERS are not influential to the wider world.

Let me explain how this works so that you understand just how ineffectual the criticism here is. Every time CTE is knocked and links to videos are posted in response the view count goes up because people can't help but to check them out. Since no knockers have ANY videos in rebuttal the viewers are free to check out the suggested videos that relate to CTE. The net effect is that the knockers end up sending people to positive demonstrations and lessons about CTE.

So thanks knockers, you are helpful in some small way through your AZB efforts to stop others from enjoying this great game.

 

[ENGLISH!]

Maybe, if so then it is even better. When people who truly have no "natural" aptitude for pool find ways that they can use to learn how to play and increase their enjoyment it is only positive for the game as a whole.

I mean if it were up to the snobs who think pool is only for so-called natural talents then pool would be super dead.

Today I am at the TAP nationals and it is FULL of people who are having a great time playing. They enjoy learning and getting better.

Sometimes I think some of the knockers on here have never in their life had a good time playing pool. Sad really.

And yes, I am too busy to spend time on the Snooker forum. I see no point to it when there are millions of people here in the USA to talk pool with.

And millions who enjoy the great amount of helpful videos on pool. So again to those of you who take the time to create those videos thank you. You're doing great and the knockers here are nothing but fleas.

And Rick; I am not "pushing" CTE hard on AZB. I mention it when it is relevant to the conversation. Also I didn't say that the membership on AZB is not significant. I said the KNOCKERS are not influential to the wider world.

Let me explain how this works so that you understand just how ineffectual the criticism here is. Every time CTE is knocked and links to videos are posted in response the view count goes up because people can't help but to check them out. Since no knockers have ANY videos in rebuttal the viewers are free to check out the suggested videos that relate to CTE. The net effect is that the knockers end up sending people to positive demonstrations and lessons about CTE.

So thanks knockers, you are helpful in some small way through your AZB efforts to stop others from enjoying this great game.

But John, as is rather often the case, you put your slant on matters.

As I said, I viewed your videos & Stan's too. After doing so & some intrigue, it became rather obvious that it was not as claimed to be & that was solidified by Stan's 5 shot perception You Tube video that put forth Five(5) different outcome angles (or more for those in between) from One(1) 'objective' visual.

That's just illogical & goes completely against science.

Yet... explanations were requested & so far not a single rational, logical, non science bending one has been given other than to 'move until you see the proper perception for the shot'.

That's not any objective instruction to use any objective means & is purely subjective based off of an 'objective' visual just as it is for fractional aiming, etc.

So... viewing the videos has just as much chance of showing that it is not as it is put forth as there is a chance that someone might accept it, especially if they go in after hearing both sides of the discussion.

So, 50/50 seems reasonable, but... given logic & common sense I'd say the odds are shaded in that direction... & that's not CTE. :wink:

Best Wishes.

PS When was it relevant to the conversation for you to merely mention IT... in a thread that YOU started about IT?

 

[JB Cases]

But John, as is rather often the case, you put your slant on matters.

As I said, I viewed your videos & Stan's too. After doing so & some intrigue, it became rather obvious that it was not as claimed to be & that was solidified by Stan's 5 shot perception You Tube video that put forth Five(5) different outcome angles (or more for those in between) from One(1) 'objective' visual.

That's just illogical & goes completely against science.

Yet... explanations were requested & so far not a single rational, logical, non science bending one has been given other than to 'move until you see the proper perception for the shot'.

That's not any objective instruction to use any objective means & is purely subjective based off of an 'objective' visual just as it is for fractional aiming, etc.

So... viewing the videos has just as much chance of showing that it is not as it is put forth as there is a chance that someone might accept it, especially if they go in after hearing both sides of the discussion.

So, 50/50 seems reasonable, but... given logic & common sense I'd say the odds are shaded in that direction... & that's not CTE. :wink:

Best Wishes.

PS When was it relevant to the conversation for you to merely mention IT... in a thread that YOU started about IT?

Well even if 50% of the people who view the CTE videos don't end up trying it that is still tens of thousands who do. All people not poisoned by the knocker's knocking.

But the best thing is when people come to me and ask me to demonstrate the multiple shots and I just line up as prescribed and make the shots on the table on demand.

Objective to the core.

 

[Ron Swanson]

Maybe, if so then it is even better. When people who truly have no "natural" aptitude for pool find ways that they can use to learn how to play and increase their enjoyment it is only positive for the game as a whole.

I mean if it were up to the snobs who think pool is only for so-called natural talents then pool would be super dead.

Today I am at the TAP nationals and it is FULL of people who are having a great time playing. They enjoy learning and getting better.

Sometimes I think some of the knockers on here have never in their life had a good time playing pool. Sad really.

And yes, I am too busy to spend time on the Snooker forum. I see no point to it when there are millions of people here in the USA to talk pool with.

And millions who enjoy the great amount of helpful videos on pool. So again to those of you who take the time to create those videos thank you. You're doing great and the knockers here are nothing but fleas.

And Rick; I am not "pushing" CTE hard on AZB. I mention it when it is relevant to the conversation. Also I didn't say that the membership on AZB is not significant. I said the KNOCKERS are not influential to the wider world.

Let me explain how this works so that you understand just how ineffectual the criticism here is. Every time CTE is knocked and links to videos are posted in response the view count goes up because people can't help but to check them out. Since no knockers have ANY videos in rebuttal the viewers are free to check out the suggested videos that relate to CTE. The net effect is that the knockers end up sending people to positive demonstrations and lessons about CTE.

So thanks knockers, you are helpful in some small way through your AZB efforts to stop others from enjoying this great game.

In the time it took you to write that guff, you could have:

1. Registered.
2. Shilled your products.
3. Made a complete fool of yourself, and
4. Been laughed out of town by all and sundry.

I am not "pushing" CTE hard on AZB. I mention it when it is relevant to the conversation.

:bow-down::bow-down::bow-down:

Inspiring stuff.

 

[ENGLISH!]

Well even if 50% of the people who view the CTE videos don't end up trying it that is still tens of thousands who do. All people not poisoned by the knocker's knocking.

But the best thing is when people come to me and ask me to demonstrate the multiple shots and I just line up as prescribed and make the shots on the table on demand.

Objective to the core.

Good Morning, John.

Tens of thousands?

You said Millions of views. That's plural. So it must be at least TWO Million. So... 50 % would be One(1) Million or at least 100s of thousands.

Let's be conservative & say 500,000. So, 500,000 x $40 per DVD would be $20,000,000. I had no idea that Stan was worth so much money.:wink:

So John... if a Pro can make shots on demand, does that mean he's using a method that is 'objective' to the core?

You seem to continually show that you really have no idea what objective really means... or... you do... but you continually misrepresent what it means.

I guess the odds could be 50/50 as to which it is.

I think I know what you believe, but your belief is misplaced.

Best Wishes.

PS I asked you in another thread if it would be okay if I PMd you with a few of questions? You either missed it or chose to not respond. So, I'll ask again, would it be okay if I PM you with a few questions.

 

[JB Cases]

Good Morning, John.

Tens of thousands?

You said Millions of views. That's plural. So it must be at least TWO Million. So... 50 % would be One(1) Million or at least 100s of thousands.

Let's be conservative & say 500,000. So, 500,000 x $40 per DVD would be $20,000,000. I had no idea that Stan was worth so much money.:wink:

So John... if a Pro can make shots on demand, does that mean he's using a method that is 'objective' to the core?

You seem to continually show that you really have no idea what objective really means... or... you do... but you continually misrepresent what it means.

I guess the odds could be 50/50 as to which it is.

I think I know what you believe, but your belief is misplaced.

Best Wishes.

PS I asked you in another thread if it would be okay if I PMd you with a few of questions? You either missed it or chose to not respond. So, I'll ask again, would it be okay if I PM you with a few questions.

Rick, tens of thousands is a conservative estimate of how many people are trying aiming systems because of you tube videos.

I would prefer that you send we questions through Facebook. That's a better medium for me.

 

[JB Cases]

In the time it took you to write that guff, you could have:

1. Registered.
2. Shilled your products.
3. Made a complete fool of yourself, and
4. Been laughed out of town by all and sundry.



:bow-down::bow-down::bow-down:

Inspiring stuff.

With no point to it. What's the point of talking about a method best demonstrated on the table to people raised and indoctrinated in a completely other way to approach the shot in an online forum?

At least in this forum we have common experiences to form the basis for discussion.

The day you post a video that can be verified its you shooting pool is the day I will post about CTE on a snooker forum,

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-N900A using Tapatalk

 

[stan shuffett]

I & others just give the other side to the claims being made with which we disagree based on what is simple common sense. That way everyone can hear both sides & make their own determinations

Again, Best Wishes.

Rick, if you and PJ and others would like to spend a little time together at a table and make a "false claims" video........I will put it on my YouTube channel at the time of my book release.

Stan Shuffett

 

[cookie man]

Rick, if you and PJ and others would like to spend a little time together at a table and make a "false claims" video........I will put it on my YouTube channel at the time of my book release.

Stan Shuffett

That would require knowledge they don't possess.

 

[ENGLISH!]

Rick, if you and PJ and others would like to spend a little time together at a table and make a "false claims" video........I will put it on my YouTube channel at the time of my book release.

Stan Shuffett

Sir, with all due respect...

Your continual inference that video can prove or disprove that which is in the realm of the abstract is rather telling to those that know better.

Best Wishes & Have a Great Weekend.

 

[SpiderWebComm]

Sir, with all due respect...

Your continual inference that video can prove or disprove that which is in the realm of the abstract is rather telling to those that know better.

Best Wishes.

I guess that doesn't apply to CJ's video for TOI or Ultimate Pool Secrets which you so strongly embrace, correct? Are you saying you couldn't do a TOI demonstration live or on video as well because it wouldn't prove anything of value?

What's telling is you're clueless how CTE is performed and deathly afraid of exposing yourself at the table as a hack player.

You are also NOT a man of your word with any character when you stated you were done posting about CTE once and for all. In fact, you are a 100% LIAR who should be ignored for all that you post.

 

[ENGLISH!]

I guess that doesn't apply to CJ's video for TOI or Ultimate Pool Secrets which you so strongly embrace, correct? Are you saying you couldn't do a TOI demonstration live or on video as well because it wouldn't prove anything of value?

What's telling is you're clueless how CTE is performed and deathly afraid of exposing yourself at the table as a hack player.

You are also NOT a man of your word with any character when you stated you were done posting about CTE once and for all. In fact, you are a 100% LIAR who should be ignored for all that you post.

On the contrary, Dave.

It's you that are misrepresenting the truth by attempting to put words into the mouths of others that were never said by them or you have reading comprehension issues or both.

That seems be a tactic here on AZB with which quite a number of individuals are rather 'prolific' &/or so is the reading comprehension issue along with the 'attacking the messenger' instead of logically & rationally dealing with the 'message' in a cognitive manner.

Since you too seem to not understand...

There is a difference between the physical & the abstract. Certain aspects of a physical nature may be able to be shown on video but not necessarily as proof, while aspects of the abstract realm can NOT be shown on video & definitely NOT as any sort of proof.

For those aspects in the abstract realm they must be discussed, explained, etc, by means of cognitive critical thinking & NOT by a seeing is believing means that is invalid for such parameters.

Best Wishes & Have a Great Weekend.

 

[SpiderWebComm]

On the contrary, Dave.

It's you that are misrepresenting the truth by attempting to put words into the mouths of others that were never said by them or you have reading comprehension issues or both.

That seems be a tactic here on AZB with which quite a number of individuals are rather 'prolific' &/or so is the reading comprehension issue along with the 'attacking the messenger' instead of logically & rationally dealing with the 'message' in a cognitive manner.

Since you too seem to not understand...

There is a difference between the physical & the abstract. Certain aspects of a physical nature may be able to be shown on video but not necessarily as proof, while aspects of the abstract realm can NOT be shown on video & definitely NOT as any sort of proof.

For those aspects in the abstract realm they must be discussed, explained, etc, by means of cognitive critical thinking & NOT by a seeing is believing means that is invalid for such parameters.

Best Wishes & Have a Great Weekend.

This is without a doubt the most absurd, nonsensical, garbled group of words and sentences put together in the history of pool forums. If a stranger read this he might be inclined to think it was written by a man with a severe mental disorder, and maybe he'd be correct.

Here's the TRANSLATION in it's simplicity...YOU'RE A PETRIFIED CHICKENSH*T
TO GET ON THE TABLE DOING A VIDEO AND BE EXPOSED FOR THE CLUELESS FRAUD THAT YOU ARE!

You've posted ONE THING that has ever made sense yet you continue to assault A CERTIFIED INSTRUCTOR with multiple credentials and certifications as well as being one of the top professional instructors in the country covering ALL facets of the game.

My name is Rick & I am NOT a certified instructor. Please make your own determinations

It wasn't long ago that Mr. Wilson gave you another couple of warnings but here you are again with the incessant accusations and misstatements.