You-tube ripping us off must read

Erica is absolutely right. There isn't any other sport where players are broke and everyone else makes money. This has been my complaint for a long time. The problem isn't with you tube, the problem is that in a lot of tournament contracts, if you sign them, you sign away your rights and if you don't sign them, you can't play. So the players don't really have a choice.

Everyone who is looking down their nose at this post really just wants to have everything free. I don't think it is promoting pool, considering pool is on a slow slide downward even though technology and video availability are better than ever. So, you have to assume that the people who watch all these videos are already in pool and just want to learn or watch for free.

Let's get real. Only 5 to 10 American pool players have made over $50,000 in tournaments this year. If that were you, you wouldn't be so happy about everyone ripping you off for your talent. I've always realized that it takes much more time to become a professional pool player than almost any regular profession. How many doctors or lawyers are there after 8 years. How many professional pool players got there in 8 years.

Thanks,
Jim

You cut a broad swath with that brush stroke.

Many of us support the industry by entering tournaments, buying equipment. It's not our responsibility to support a pro tour.

I watch golf on tv, do I pay for it? I suppose a minute fraction of my cable bill would go towards the broadcast, however, I pay my cable bill regardless of whether I watch golf or not.

Paying to view Pool isn't a big money maker because the market of people actually wanting to watch it is so small.

It's an economy of scale.

Don't be offended, that's the facts Jack
 
I have a quick Question for someone that can give me an Answer. Does Accustats pay royalties to pool players?For Example if someone buys the One Pocket Match 1P15-01D Justin Hall vs. Alex Pagulayan (DVD) for 19.95$ do both players get a percentage of the sales? In my opinion they should as well as a percentage of what the live Stream generated. So the problem is not You Tube in my opinion. Any Comments? If Accustats does not pay royalties ( Which i hope they do) then Pat Fleming is just simply making money off the players performance. I hope i'm wrong because if he does not compensate the players , then the only people that can be blamed are the players. What are your thoughts?

Of course they don't. Don't be daft
 
I've been in the digital advertising industry my whole adult life and can say, Erika's numbers aren't ridiculous. $500,000 is probably a fair estimate. That said, I'm just curious but, how do you expect to generate ad sales once you've moved all of these videos off Youtube? I mean, when Apple wants to run an ad campaign, they're paying Youtube's price because it's Youtube. Do you really think they're going to pay that much when the video is hosted by TAR? Does TAR have the resources to go after those advertising dollars? Has TAR ever hosted an ad campaign for a Fortune 500 company?

You missed the point in the original post. It is not the intention of removing all billiard videos from YouTube and putting them on another steamlined website. It is for information to be exposed of what is happening. And as to mention moving forward, billiards would benefit having its own infrastructure with billiard videos.

Because Youtube is owned by Google and Google owns the ad server, the ad exchange and the agency ad server, hosting billiards content (or any content, for that matter) can be profitable, no matter how big or small. Can the same be said when the operation is moved entirely over to a non-Google entity? Will TAR be able to make the same partnerships, offer the same targeting capabilities, manage campaigns with the same level of detail or will something get lost in the shuffle? I bet they'll just rely on subscription fees because that's simpler.

The fact is, advertising revenue exists because Google made it exist. If you move the content, the advertising dollars will flow elsewhere.

But, google is smart. They don't use advertising explicitly from their ad campaigns. They use many others as well. YouTube is a 40 billion dollar entity in its own forthright.
 
I think the OP might be more useful than most think, this thread has made it to 20 pages with the Donald Trump approach.

(can't believe this thing is still going)

BINGO! At least "Schlonged" wasn't used instead of "Ripped Off".
 
As a viewer, I simply turn on my smart tv, pull up youtube, and look at my subscriptions for new content ready to watch. I get recommendations, new videos, and easily add subscriptions.

Currently I have 1 pool related subscription (CSI) out of 25 subscribed channels (mostly fishing related bassmaster, flw, etc). I would subscribe to other pool channels but I dont look for them.

Until your product has an app that is available directly on smart tv's and the devices that are common in my house hold I would not see it nor would I go out of my way to find it. I am not going to purchase yet another separate device that can load that content either.

In my opinion working with YouTube would get a larger audience assuming content was engaging and viewers felt it was worth "subscribing".

~Perk

What's cool about the internet? SmartTV's have web browsers to surf internet addresses and skip all the bloat from an app and their intrusive unrelated advertisements. The key element in this hype, is eliminating middle persons with their hand where it doesn't belong.
 
Dam your not sharing with Ritchie are you ,, thier not rock stars they don't get royalties every time thier video is shown
Let's not forget everyone involved in the production should get paid also down to the commentators ,, now that I'm thinking about it we are looking at a stick of bubble gum

1

Who is in the middle? iphone>internet>crazyerica.com Shortest route with the objective of the original post. No 3rd parties with hands in the cookie jar.
 
You are reading a thread that was started by a small group of people who feel that they have found the so-called 'magic bullet', that's going to fix pool and get all the players the money they deserve for all of the hard work they do in front of the camera.

Actually a larger group of individuals. About 20 of us, just to let you know what's up and how we've grown over the past 5 years. On Site Pool Network is actually a separate channel on the new entity. A large reason why things have changed, is from trial and error with the ideas, we needed a neutral entity and more organization. The foundation is now APBGLOBAL.COM, Associated Pool-Billiards Global, LLC. DBA AP Global Video. Yes. It's a real company with real people. 1-855-750-7665 Ext:2 to reach me.

I have been bothered by 'Goldy' (as he likes to call himself now) about this shite for over 3 years and I will still NEVER drink the Kool Aid, no matter how many new flavors they come in.

I have maybe contacted you 3 times in the last 5 years concerning our efforts. Mike Warden "TvMike" may have contacted you more than I have. But TvMike and Myself are two separate entities. Though I do help TvMike stay as private as he can to elude the free streaming alternatives on the internet.

In my opinion, the best pool players in the world SHOULD be getting paid more, but not from the media. They should be getting better sponsor contracts and higher tournament payouts! The industry should be giving back, but not this part of the industry who are basically still trying to find their own identities as broadcasters. When the industry as a whole starts to improve, then you can wonder about the guys like US, promoting and broadcasting pool. Pay Per View is a different subject entirely and not pertinent to this thread.

You've been broadcasting and promoting pool for 5 years now with live billiard video. You use YouTube as your vehicle for On-Demand, and Ustream as your vehicle to live stream. What do you pay for those services? Have you read the EULA and TOS agreements when you use their free service? Better get to reading up on them, is their pretty damning in claims to the content under certain circumstances. And in these 5 years, where are your large corporate sponsors? Why after so long don't you have any? Because you don't need too. All the large corporate advertisements are already running over your content via YouTube and UStream, that maybe on a good year you reap 1-2%. Sucks, eh?

Something about me...
When I started out streaming pool, it was to promote pool; not solve the problem of how pool players can get raises or get paid more. Being paid more is something that I figured would be a natural progression if the mainstream media and sponsors would begin paying more attention to us. So, my mission is to figure out how to improve on YOUR experience as the viewer. It's a slow process, with my limited resources, but I'm a man of unlimited passion for this sport; so you see the trade off...

I am basically a video journalist of cue-sports and a once-in-awhile, video producer of content, who promotes the players, pool halls, various games and some industry news. That's pretty much it. I made almost 25K this year doing it, and it wasn't all from YouTube. I busted my ass for nights on end doing everything that the various promoters and room owners couldn't do for themselves. I work very hard to promote my sponsors and in return, they pay me a modest fee that is just about agreeable. To top it off, I probably put about 30% of this year's earnings back into POV POOL so that I could continue to bring the viewers as much live action as possible. I don't think I should even begin to bring into view the importance of exposing pool-players to the world and what is has done for the industry in the past 10 years. Simply put, live streaming has saved a lot about pool that was dying... and if you really, really, really, really must know my opinion; I personally feel that if if wasn't for live streaming in the past 10 years, the 9 foot table would be virtually missing from the pool halls and the pool halls themselves would be shrinking into oblivion.

There is no doubt what you do is GREAT for pool, has been GREAT for pool, and continues to be GREAT for pool. This post was not the intention to single out your passion and make you a bad person. The post is not singling out anyone. The ORIGINAL POST is informative to what is REALLY HAPPENING behind the scenes that, ALL OF US are supporting in some form or fashion, INDIRECTLY. I understand you may not have the expertise or experience to whip up a scenario where you could corner all the amenities that YouTube and Ustream provide. So WE ALL UNDERSTAND, why we use those free services in trade for the content. It's actually quite a good way to get exposure. But Financially, it is DOOMED, for the creator of the content, the players, and the sponsors.

What I'm trying to accomplish for pool goes beyond pointing a camera and a pool table, commenting, promoting the pool room, the players, and the products. It's an new vehicle for live billiard streamers to take advantage of new technology to reach the world WITHOUT trading the videos for the service, and putting the videos in a LOSE/LOSE situation FOREVER. Because that is the prized glory. Is the video after its been captured/created. With the YouTube/U-Stream model, there's no way to protect the video and its value down the road. It's like receiving a 20 dollar bill, spending it, and it becomes nothing after it is spent. Today, with the amount of videos on YouTube, there is plenty of exposure for the sport for the next 100 years. So using the "pool needs exposure" card is irrelevant.

Now, about this "NON-YouTube Business Model" (AKA 'THE SPINNING WHEEL OF DEATH")
-
Let's speculate for a minute that every billiard/pool media provider in the country abandon's their YouTube model and joins the 'ONSITE POOL NETWORK', which is Zach Goldsmith's dream; his passion project that will turn him into the Ted Turner of pool media and create jobs and success for millions of amateur pool players who end up on the live stream table every month at Hard Times Billiards and at Skinny Bobs 9-Ball Tournament/s.

They would be joining a neutral entity. AP GLOBAL Video, which provides all the amenities at one place to successfully and privately live stream to the world and limiting 3rd parties with rights to the content (YouTube/Ustream/Etc.). Its more or less a AV Video Web on steroids. We offer a cloud hosted solution for live streaming to all over the world to all devices. Flash, HLS, MPEG-Dash, RTSP, RTMP, and HDS. Also on-demand streaming, or file streaming to protect videos from being ripped off, ripped, and stolen. Membership gateways for the content that directly link to the persons PayPal or Stripe accounts. You can do free streams and PPV streams with the only cost being the Credit Card Fee's.

There have been many things that have changed in my approach since TvMike was let go, and he could go do his things on his own. Some of the first ideas he is using, is working quite well, except a huge hurdle is keeping members subscribed. Which is something that is going to happen. Also, with personal experiences and personal life issues, that could diminish a subscriber base by 50%, is not a good situation a company is to be in to be successful.

So, now everyone's media has stopped uploading to YouTube and all YOU (the viewer) has to do is pay $5.99 a month to watch THE ONSITE POOL NETWORK, where you can access, TAR, InsidePool, Kevin Kidd, TV Mike, POV Pool, Accu-Stats, CSI, Mezz Tour, Predator Tour, Tiger Tour, Romanian Pyramits Tour, Jason Hunt's Porno Pool, Crazy Erica's Spinning Wheels of Death and much, much, more...

Actually, it is encouraged to use YouTube. Except. YouTube should be used as the excerpt/teaser to drive most of the traffic to your own website. Which is the proper eCommerce solution to gaining the highest percentages of revenue from advertisements ON YOUR WATCH.

In a perfect world, it's actually not a bad idea. Take pool back into our own hands and own the media for ourselves so that we can monetize it ourselves and reward ourselves for our hard work and yes, this includes the players as well...Furthermore, If someone where to show me a proposal that makes sense, is transparent and good for the industry, then I'm all ears.

It's a very neat idea that Myself and many others have been working on. It's a shame you've listened to all the hype and negative information, and haven't once phoned me to discuss. I'm actually shocked.

(Costs to consider for just a brief moment - Bandwidth, Player Royalties, Network Agreements, Admin, Hosting, Legal, Promotions, Creative, Production, Post Production)

All those costs are taken care of at AP GLOBAL Video. We provide all those amenities for $20/mo. What you don't mention here, is 24/7 Tech Support. Which is always available to help get the most from the technology we host. AP GLOBAL provides dedicated hosting. The only thing that is shared, is the user base of all sites who use the service. This eliminates a customer service nightmare. You get to even use your own Domain Name, and your domain name is shown in the address bar. It's a perm 301 redirect.

First off, if this were even remotely possible to accomplish, let's say that just 15 premium streamers were to jump onto Goldy's network - IT WILL NEVER HAPPEN, but let's say it does...You've now just bottlenecked your audience by over 50% because there's no way to get a large number of the free audience to turn to a subscription model. So, now you've reduced your audience...OOPS there goes almost 70% of the sponsors that you used to have because nobody is even watching this crap anymore now that it's a mere $5.99 a month.

Damn - I just lost half my audience and sponsors! What does POV do now? Help me, Jason Hunt. Pick up the phone, CrazyErica!

- Okay so, 10,000 people aren't paying $5.99 a month, but let's say 4,500 are paying it... (Sound Crazy?)

Cool! Your company is now making $26,955 per month.Selling 15 channels of pool content from different providers, all with their own special brand of storytelling that makes this network so awesome!

Not true. With AP Global, it doesn't matter if you want to do a membership based content on-demand or free. Its all up to what you want to do. Our main goal at AP Global is to get everyone using our vehicle to live stream, so down the road we can leverage, all together, advertising revenue, and get much much more, instead of the pennies YouTube or others Pay. Please do not listen to TvMike. He is no way associated with AP GLOBAL Video, and the sites we currently host for live video marketing. However, I DO HELP TvMike to keep his existing platform running smooth from a backend standpoint. I'm his IT/Unix Admin Guy.

4 years ago, when I didn't even know you Zach, I gave you a chance to pitch me properly... I asked for a proposal or something on paper and you balked...

4 years ago, it was still very new concept, and totally nothing was on paper. It was a bunch of code gobbled on a server, that worked for the purpose of evading the EULA, TOS, contracts of the free streaming services. So if we did have a winner video, it wouldn't be lost to someone else, or someone else telling us what to do.

Today. We host 10 sites with prominent figures in the billiard indsutry, and I look forward to serving them as CUSTOMERS, and doing what they ask me to do, instead of the other way around, which is because of the limitations the YouTube/U-stream model provide from a exclusivity standpoint. The major resolve of AP GLOBAL Video, is eliminating all 3rd party branding that shouldn't be there.

I will say one redeeming thing about you, Zach!
Good job on the Space City Open and a nice new look for your website. Your streaming looks very clean and my hat is off to you. I am always thoroughly impressed and proud of people who make vast improvements to their show because after all, that's what we should be doing.

MERRY CHRISTMAS ALL!

Same to you Danny. We all work hard for pool!

I think you have some great objections to this approach, but at least I hope I've solved some of those misconceptions and doubts.

MERRY CHRISTMAS To you and yours as well.

Zach "Goldy" Goldsmith
 
You're delightfully misguided.

Yeah. Well, we have a test going on that will be posted here, the results, That YouTube or a Private Website is better.... I'm going to be happy to prove the results for the non-believers. :)

I will not post the links nor the video at this time, because of sabotage...

But give m 24 hours, and we'll see who wins.
 
You missed the point in the original post. It is not the intention of removing all billiard videos from YouTube and putting them on another steamlined website. It is for information to be exposed of what is happening. And as to mention moving forward, billiards would benefit having its own infrastructure with billiard videos.



But, google is smart. They don't use advertising explicitly from their ad campaigns. They use many others as well. YouTube is a 40 billion dollar entity in its own forthright.

It seems several people have "missed the point". Perhaps your point has changed since the original post? Erika specified posting matches to Youtube, playing in front of cameras without getting paid, and how there is $500,000 in revenue that pool players are "LOOSING [sic] OUT ON". She suggests that moving the content to pool sites will inherently move the revenue and I disagree. That money happened not because of pool but because of Youtube.
 
Yeah. Well, we have a test going on that will be posted here, the results, That YouTube or a Private Website is better.... I'm going to be happy to prove the results for the non-believers. :)

I will not post the links nor the video at this time, because of sabotage...

But give m 24 hours, and we'll see who wins.

The view count is currently... Website 26, YouTube 19..
 
It seems several people have "missed the point". Perhaps your point has changed since the original post? Erika specified posting matches to Youtube, playing in front of cameras without getting paid, and how there is $500,000 in revenue that pool players are "LOOSING [sic] OUT ON". She suggests that moving the content to pool sites will inherently move the revenue and I disagree. That money happened not because of pool but because of Youtube.

You're right. It happened because of YouTube. But I CAN ASSURE YOU, with a private entity with 200,000+ billiard videos, would make such a significant amount of money from advertising, that would pay the industry back a nice check. Also, properly with the RIGHT PEOPLE running it of course.

Also, YouTube can keep what they have. We actually would need those videos there, to heighten another entity specializing in the billiard industry. Can't hurt. And it's almost ready!
 
Last edited:
You're right. It happened because of YouTube. But I CAN ASSURE YOU, with a private entity with 200,000+ billiard videos, would make such a significant amount of money from advertising, that would pay the industry back a nice check. Also, properly with the RIGHT PEOPLE running it of course.

Also, YouTube can keep what they have. We actually would need those videos there, to heighten another entity specializing in the billiard industry. Can't hurt. And it's almost ready!

So then, what was the point of this entire thread again?
 
Uh oh!!! YouTube is losing!!! 36 - 21 now. Wonder why that is? Does YouTube promote our sport?? What could exactly be happening here.

Does youtube promote kittens? Does Kroeger promote pickled beets?

Some middlemen provide a worthwhile service.

Erica claimed to be in marketing..

You said you have zeeeeero advertising..

What can you offer by taking product away from a massive site like YouTube and making yourself the middleman? So far, just telling everyone how much YouTube is worth even though you've managed to misd the fact that they really don't make a profit.
 
Does youtube promote kittens? Does Kroeger promote pickled beets?

Some middlemen provide a worthwhile service.

Erica claimed to be in marketing..

You said you have zeeeeero advertising..

What can you offer by taking product away from a massive site like YouTube and making yourself the middleman? So far, just telling everyone how much YouTube is worth even though you've managed to misd the fact that they really don't make a profit.

They don't make PROFIT? LOL..... If they didn't make profit, then they wouldn't have stock. How DUMB can someone be.. Seriously.
 
Last edited:
To sell themselves as the middlemen with high hopes of getting advertising equivalent to YouTube.

Anybody want to place bets?

Anyone has the equivalent power of YouTube, Google, Facebook, Vpaid Ads. It's based upon impressions and clicks. All that can be done privately with a website. To boot? You get 100% of that revenue, whereas on YouTube, you get a fraction of it.
 
Back
Top