Those tables has 8" pockets though. You better shoot at yout hole.
It was 1997, btw.
Thanks. Those were GANDI tables
Those tables has 8" pockets though. You better shoot at yout hole.
It was 1997, btw.
Is it going to be Efren and SVB in the finals regardless of what happens in today's matches?
If Efren loses to Shane.....and JJ beats Alex....they got some book work to do to see who
plays Shane.
I know they would both end up 3-2 in that case, but Efren beat JJ 3-0 when they played, and even if Efren lost 4-0 today and JJ won 4-0 Efren would still lead in overall games.
So what tiebreak system would give JJ the advantage over Efren?
Noon: Tony Chohan vs. Danny Smith
2:30pm: Efren Reyes vs. Shane Van Boening
Dinner Break
7:00pm: Alex Pagulayan vs. Jeremy Jones
9:30pm: The Finals
Players to be announced
http://www.accu-stats.com/liveppv.html
View attachment 424758
I know they would both end up 3-2 in that case, but Efren beat JJ 3-0 when they played, and even if Efren lost 4-0 today and JJ won 4-0 Efren would still lead in overall games.
So what tiebreak system would give JJ the advantage over Efren?
I know they would both end up 3-2 in that case, but Efren beat JJ 3-0 when they played, and even if Efren lost 4-0 today and JJ won 4-0 Efren would still lead in overall games.
So what tiebreak system would give JJ the advantage over Efren?
I had a few things to do today....but I'm gonna watch one-pocket instead.
I know they would both end up 3-2 in that case, but Efren beat JJ 3-0 when they played, and even if Efren lost 4-0 today and JJ won 4-0 Efren would still lead in overall games.
So what tiebreak system would give JJ the advantage over Efren?
Which of the matches were to 4?
The question is why, since it is round robin, did they switch to 4?
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
I dont think Shane played at Buffalos
Yay, the Old Dude won.
:yeah: