I think most of us have learned that regardless of how good or great any athlete, team or pool player
truly is, and this applies to even the legends of pool, each and every competitor in every sport that's
imaginable can have an off day, or not feel well the day of competition, or get screwed by the judges
or referees.....in pool, it's called rub of the green just like in golf. i.e., horribly bad luck.
History has proven, at least based upon team and individual stats, that the best team or competitor
does not always prevail. I think sports pundits have rationalized this into the old expression......
"On any given day, blah, blah blah."
Of course that's true and we all know that. I learned that lesson over the years losing a few wagers.
Well, the same applies to any pool match today.......and a repeatable winning performance is truly
the best gauge and confirmation of durability, consistency and greatness. That's why the original
format of the U.S. Open in straight pool is the most fair measure of pool skills created and I miss it.
Regional competition to decide the field; thereafter, round robin competition until the last two standing to compete for the U.S. Open Championship (14.1).
It wasn't a single game, or a race to best of. Oh no, the legends were men of stamina, determination and greatly skilled players. Indeed, there's little doubt that
Willie was the best of the best. In straight pool, Willie had runs of 365, 355, 322, 309 and regularly ran 150 and out. Let's see today's players accomplish that
on any size table. Irving Crane said he feared Willie the most, even when Irving held a big lead because Crane knew that if he missed, the match might be over.
Irving felt he couldn't afford to miss because that's just how good Mosconi was. He'd just steam roll right over you to victory if he got the opportunity.
The original format of the U.S. Open allowed for the final two competitors to have a hot hand or even a couple of great games because it was a race but not to
a specific number of games. It was the first player to reach 2500 points and so the Open Championship was played in a series of cities across the U.S.A. Since
there wasn't any television or radio coverage, the results were available in the newspapers only or by actual attendance.
Yup, first man to reach 2500 points determines the winner seemed like the most equitable format to decide the best player since if you had an off day and were
blown away in one of your matches, even 2 or 3 of them, you still could control the outcome since there was a lot of road left to travel. In my opinion, that format,
while admittedly taking a lot a longer, provided the best venue for truly deciding the greatest player more than any other format. And in that kingdom, Willie wore the crown.
Matt B.