Slight underdog - Realizing your equity

Tin Man

AzB Gold Member
Gold Member
Silver Member
Top players have to be able to do many things well.

60-90%+ They have to convert on their scoring opportunities with a high level of consistency.
40-60%+ They have to come with difficult shots, positional plays, and safeties to win games in which they don't hold much advantage at all and where the threat of loss looms large.
10% or less They have to steal some games in which they are really up against it with an occasional hero shot.

10-40% In my mind the biggest leak for many players is how they handle the situation when they are just a slight underdog. These are the games in which they are probably going to lose, but in which their decisions and execution at the table will dictate how often they are able to turn the tables.

This leak is often caused by the player feeling more hopeless than they are. This leads them to either 1) Give less than their full effort, or 2) Make a poor shot selection by going into desperation mode. For example:

1) A 9 ball player is playing shape for the 8 and hooks themselves behind the 9 ball. The 8 ball is in the middle of the table and the player has to kick to the end rail. There is no controllable shot or safety, and it is likely that even with a good hit the game will be lost. So our player gets discouraged, shoots hard and quickly, missed the 8 ball entirely, and finally rakes the balls and concedes that game.

2) A 9 ball player has a full hit on the 8 ball from long distance but doesn't have a good shot or a good safety. They are playing a tough opponent and feel that if they don't lock them up they will lose. They consider a few alternatives but none of them look attractive. Finally they decide "If I'm going to lose I'm going to go down swinging!" and they shoot at an off angle long rail bank, miss, and sell dead out.

In my experience these are the games that most often win and lose sessions. Of course converting on scoring opportunities is critical, but I think everyone understands this and that is where they put their focus. But these are the games that lead to huge momentum swings. Give your opponent an easy win and watch their run out game smooth out even more. But wrestle and steal a game like this away, or even just grind and make them earn it if you lose, and you keep the pressure on. This wins you more games as well as more future opportunities.

In watching Chang's matches in the US Open he shined in many ways. Of course he ran out like a machine when the balls were runnable. But he also did a great job of realizing all of his equity when he was in difficult situations. I don't recall ever seeing him go into desperation mode, no matter the ball layout, the score, or the skill of his opponent. Instead he stayed in the present, made common sense decisions, and did his best with the opportunity in front of him to make things as difficult for his opponent as possible.

Meanwhile Ko, who played superbly all tournament, blew an 11-7 lead in the finals by trying to force opportunities that weren't quite there. Granted they were difficult, but I really got the feel that he was trying to deliver a knock out punch and win the tournament with one great shot. Those choices resulted in Chang getting the opportunities he needed to win 6 in a row. Chang on the other hand kept cool and in control with common sense decisions, giving Ko chances to make these types of mistakes. I really think if Ko had settled for what the table had offered a bit more in his last 3-4 chances he might have stopped Chang's rally and had a shot at the title.

I think we all do this well when we're in the zone, but when we are struggling this is one of the first things to go. We have to stay present and have belief that things can turn around. If we don't feel confident we have to remember we're not entitled to feeling confident, but that confidence can be earned. If we stay calm and earn another inning we may be presented with an opportunity we handle, and next thing we know we feel totally different.

Maybe this has to do with having the wrong goal. If our goal is simply to 'win the game' we might be extra discouraged because it doesn't look likely. But if we shift our goal to 'making the best decision we can and giving it our best effort' then we do better, because that is a goal we CAN hit.

So next time you find yourself in a difficult spot that you feel is hopeless, and you find your brain suggesting hail mary shots, slow down and take a breath. Ask yourself "If I lose with this shot will I be kicking myself for taking it on as I walk back to my chair?", and if the answer is yes then find an alternative you can stand behind. Then, once you do, give it your best effort and be proud that you are a fierce competitor. You can't win them all, but you might be surprised how strong your results become from growing more and more comfortable and optimistic in losing positions!
 
Top players have to be able to do many things well.

60-90%+ They have to convert on their scoring opportunities with a high level of consistency.
40-60%+ They have to come with difficult shots, positional plays, and safeties to win games in which they don't hold much advantage at all and where the threat of loss looms large.
10% or less They have to steal some games in which they are really up against it with an occasional hero shot.

10-40% In my mind the biggest leak for many players is how they handle the situation when they are just a slight underdog. These are the games in which they are probably going to lose, but in which their decisions and execution at the table will dictate how often they are able to turn the tables.

This leak is often caused by the player feeling more hopeless than they are. This leads them to either 1) Give less than their full effort, or 2) Make a poor shot selection by going into desperation mode. For example:

1) A 9 ball player is playing shape for the 8 and hooks themselves behind the 9 ball. The 8 ball is in the middle of the table and the player has to kick to the end rail. There is no controllable shot or safety, and it is likely that even with a good hit the game will be lost. So our player gets discouraged, shoots hard and quickly, missed the 8 ball entirely, and finally rakes the balls and concedes that game.

2) A 9 ball player has a full hit on the 8 ball from long distance but doesn't have a good shot or a good safety. They are playing a tough opponent and feel that if they don't lock them up they will lose. They consider a few alternatives but none of them look attractive. Finally they decide "If I'm going to lose I'm going to go down swinging!" and they shoot at an off angle long rail bank, miss, and sell dead out.

In my experience these are the games that most often win and lose sessions. Of course converting on scoring opportunities is critical, but I think everyone understands this and that is where they put their focus. But these are the games that lead to huge momentum swings. Give your opponent an easy win and watch their run out game smooth out even more. But wrestle and steal a game like this away, or even just grind and make them earn it if you lose, and you keep the pressure on. This wins you more games as well as more future opportunities.

In watching Chang's matches in the US Open he shined in many ways. Of course he ran out like a machine when the balls were runnable. But he also did a great job of realizing all of his equity when he was in difficult situations. I don't recall ever seeing him go into desperation mode, no matter the ball layout, the score, or the skill of his opponent. Instead he stayed in the present, made common sense decisions, and did his best with the opportunity in front of him to make things as difficult for his opponent as possible.

Meanwhile Ko, who played superbly all tournament, blew an 11-7 lead in the finals by trying to force opportunities that weren't quite there. Granted they were difficult, but I really got the feel that he was trying to deliver a knock out punch and win the tournament with one great shot. Those choices resulted in Chang getting the opportunities he needed to win 6 in a row. Chang on the other hand kept cool and in control with common sense decisions, giving Ko chances to make these types of mistakes. I really think if Ko had settled for what the table had offered a bit more in his last 3-4 chances he might have stopped Chang's rally and had a shot at the title.

I think we all do this well when we're in the zone, but when we are struggling this is one of the first things to go. We have to stay present and have belief that things can turn around. If we don't feel confident we have to remember we're not entitled to feeling confident, but that confidence can be earned. If we stay calm and earn another inning we may be presented with an opportunity we handle, and next thing we know we feel totally different.

Maybe this has to do with having the wrong goal. If our goal is simply to 'win the game' we might be extra discouraged because it doesn't look likely. But if we shift our goal to 'making the best decision we can and giving it our best effort' then we do better, because that is a goal we CAN hit.

So next time you find yourself in a difficult spot that you feel is hopeless, and you find your brain suggesting hail mary shots, slow down and take a breath. Ask yourself "If I lose with this shot will I be kicking myself for taking it on as I walk back to my chair?", and if the answer is yes then find an alternative you can stand behind. Then, once you do, give it your best effort and be proud that you are a fierce competitor. You can't win them all, but you might be surprised how strong your results become from growing more and more comfortable and optimistic in losing positions!

Good post. I don't have much to add, other than to quote Buddy Hall (who was quoting Eddie Taylor): "When you find yourself in a tough spot, don't think tough, think easy!"

I've found that the super complicated stuff often backfires, especially if you don't have any faith in your ability to execute it. In those cases I usually shoot a simple shot, something I know I can do. I go for tough shots too, but only if I feel that I have a chance at it. Against tough opposition, you usually cannot rely on your opponent making a mistake and you have to shoot. However, if the shot isn't there, give the opponent the chance to make a mistake instead of doing it yourself. That way you can gain confidence, while he gets weaker (should he happen to miss). If not, you didn't lose much anyway. Nothing worse than whiffing the ball in a late stage of a tournament. Trust me, I'm an expert at that.

Maybe I can add a little story after all. It's the final day of a tournament and I'm playing an older, experienced player with knowledge and decent runout skills, but not with huge shooting power. It's fairly close, he's not missing any shots, but he's playing safes where he leaves me half chances, off angled banks and the like. I make a couple of these, but it kind of got into my head a little bit. I started wondering why he was baiting me this way, did he think I couldn't make them? Pretty soon my mind got in my way, and I somehow lost on the hill.
 
Last edited:
I agree, but would add that the calculation involved in deciding to pass or shoot on a tough shot is really complicated (including a lot of guesswork) and often favors taking a swing at a low percentage (less than 50%) shot if there's not an easy defensive opportunity, especially against better opponents. Either way, whether playing offense of defense, the general message of committing to every shot and trying to give yourself the best shot at winning is a good one. I'm sure there are a lot of matches that I could have won by keeping this in mind instead of firing away haphazardly in a tough situation.
 
Great post, beautiful philosophy

Tin Man, thank you for this. Credible thoughts on how to approach the table, instead of the usual, macho bs. You and Marek have posted some really good stuff, that pertains to players of all skill levels. Do what you can, instead of what you should, or wish you could.
 
Good Stuff.
High offense level is needed on high level play but you should still be able to duck when needed.
I do that mistake a lot. I think it is my greatest weakness. Because my offensive skills are so high level I try to do too much.
I noticed that easy now when played more Snooker.
I can do many century breaks on row when practice and then I start playing and I try do them when they are not there. :frown:
Should just play more safety and try get good place to start break. :embarrassed2:
Also my whole mental game need study/improve. I think this is directly related with it.

Thanks for nice thoughts. :thumbup:
 
Thanks guys. I have always been very demanding of myself when it comes to decision making because I figure I should be able to make good decisions almost without fail. Everyone is going to miss a shot or lose the cue ball on the break now and then, but there really is no excuse for me to walk away from the table wondering why I did something stupid, then facing a day of plane rides home wishing I had that tough opportunity again.

I realize aggression is needed to win at the highest levels. There is truth in the idea that if the safety is difficult to execute and marginal even when hit to perfection then going for a difficult shot is often wise. No reason to shoot shots that can lose you the game but not win you the game. All of that.

But this can be taken too far. People can overuse this concept. "Oh, well, safety is tough, I'll just go down swinging".

In a way it's similar to the balance between valuing every inning versus being afraid of missing. Top players can't be fearful, but they also can't be reckless. Jason Shaw's game the last couple of years is a super high gear because he has found how to keep the mad aggression up while still slowing down and making conservative choices when needed. You have to survive long enough to get the opportunity to use your aggression.

My main point was in watching JL Chang win the title it seemed this was the area that set him apart. Ko did this very well throughout the tournament also but the situation at hand seemed to impact him at the end. Chang was prepared to take the opportunity and it was reflected in a series of really strong decisions. I can't recall ever displaying a sense of desperation even when he was in worse spots than those others would have already hit the panic button on. It really stood out during the match and I wanted to share with those that didn't have the chance to see.
 
Back
Top