is superman ready for tony?
- Thread starter deanoc
- Start date
No, end thread.
Don’t you even wanna see it first? I think it would be fun to watch. And it’s pool, Gomez could definitely win especially a shorter set. Maybe not overall but
Dean, what is the motivation for asking?
You don't do PPV, are you trying to stake one of them, start a discussion, bet on it?
You don't do PPV, are you trying to stake one of them, start a discussion, bet on it?
Be a great match the only parts Tony is better in is the moving and some banks it's short lived , he better catch that game now is all I can say the kid is a superstar player it's not if but when he will be better that TRex one pocket player ,, I'd say inside 2 yrs Tony won't have anything for him
1
Roberto
Looks like it might be Roberto/Danny next as he works his way up the ladder
Looks like it might be Roberto/Danny next as he works his way up the ladder
That would be my choice for a realistic matchup.
as to my motivation
I am not sure,but if I turn into a stake horse,
my wife plans to
have me declared mentallyincompetant.
She has been saving these post as further evidence,as
if that were not enough alone
I think roberto looks like the straightest shooter in the game
within a few months or weeks he might be the very best at
one pocket as well
I was just wondering not scheming
I am not sure,but if I turn into a stake horse,
my wife plans to
have me declared mentallyincompetant.
She has been saving these post as further evidence,as
if that were not enough alone
I think roberto looks like the straightest shooter in the game
within a few months or weeks he might be the very best at
one pocket as well
I was just wondering not scheming
here is a recent tony vs. lunda, for comparison: https://youtu.be/k3VkMqUrHgc
pretty lopsided. i'd say it's still alex, dennis, tony, shane. in that order..
pretty lopsided. i'd say it's still alex, dennis, tony, shane. in that order..
I concur. Except for i'd say Shane would be interchangeable with Busty on any given day.
SVB is not in the top 5 in 1p. Not in my opinion. There are players that aren't even close to as well known as he is, that he can't play even and win consistently. I'm not saying he can't go toe to toe and win, because he can, with any of them.
I agree with Danny Smith being a good game with Gomez. Good blend of moves and shots to be seen I would think!
Hell, if any of us of didn't sell out when we shot, we could win too. LOL
I agree with Danny Smith being a good game with Gomez. Good blend of moves and shots to be seen I would think!
Hell, if any of us of didn't sell out when we shot, we could win too. LOL
Who were the top 5 players in the last 2 Big Dog One Pocket 16 man tourneys? Those names.
Agree to disagree.
He won the DCC 1p two years in a row, and that was when efren/shannon/frost were still playing real hot.
He also went hill hill in a race to 10 playing even with Tony when Tony was still a contender for 2nd with DO.
All that while it not being a discipline he really focuses on.
SVB vs anyone below the top 4 he's at least even money.
I agree, to agree. Good post.
I just stated my opinion. Hence why I said, "In my opinion."
Seems like fire power is more important than the "moves". Dennis, Shane and Alex have done exceptionally well against the so called one pocket experts.
Just because somebody finishes higher in a single event doesn't mean they are a better player.
I realized when I said what I said I would get some blowback. And don't get me wrong here I know Shane is a top-tier elite player no matter what. I also agree with your assessment on players finishing higher or lower doesn't necessarily make them a Better or Worse player, especially with the short Races they play. And I don't mean Shane is outside of the top 10 necessarily at any given time... he just doesn't devote his game to one pocket and it's probably his worst game when it comes down it. I'm pretty sure he would even tell you that.