you have an issue with that?
What would I have a issue with??
you have an issue with that?
What would I have a issue with??
I commented many years ago on this forum that there were some mistakes made concerning the shots on my F5 video. My mistakes. NOT system mistakes.
Stan Shuffett
your posts are a bit difficult to get a read on, cant tell if ur geniune or being trollish
I think you've made countless mistakes. IMO you plagiarized a man's knowledge and spring boarded that to making it YOUR own (it's the best and f.... the rest attitude), your speaking ability is suspect, as well as your overmarketing tactics. You take something easy and make it seem complicated so as to make you seem omni intelligent when a case could be made the opposite is true.
. This shall be my last post on this forum anyway. I play better the way I see things and dont use any of what you pontificate. Good luck with that one world order way thing of yours. If your so smart, why didnt you figure out a way yourself instead of having to ride on the coat tails of someone else's knowledge then call it your own ha. You should of created a place where your own kind can go and bicker a long while ago. Canwin
I think you've made countless mistakes. IMO you plagiarized a man's knowledge and spring boarded that to making it YOUR own (it's the best and f.... the rest attitude), your speaking ability is suspect, as well as your overmarketing tactics. You take something easy and make it seem complicated so as to make you seem omni intelligent when a case could be made the opposite is true.
. This shall be my last post on this forum anyway. I play better the way I see things and dont use any of what you pontificate. Good luck with that one world order way thing of yours. If your so smart, why didnt you figure out a way yourself instead of having to ride on the coat tails of someone else's knowledge then call it your own ha. You should of created a place where your own kind can go and bicker a long while ago. Canwin
Same here...but you did come with some subconscious thing happening with pro1 which is a start towards the truth of whats being done for success. Not to many others will admit to that.
Hals system was nothing like pro1..nothing. Hal basically told me the shot boils down to a thick or thin cte pivot..that's it. It does make some shots...but not all without some tweaking.
stan
i am an open minded pool player
who have given you the benefit of the doubt
but i must say
i cant understand why your material is not available after all these years of promising the truth series and the book
and saying how great it will be when it comes out
to use an analogy
i have blue balls waiting
i want to buy your book and watch the videos
if it helps me play better
GREAT
:thumbup::wink:
there must be a way to speed things along
PJ, You are correct. A single CTE perception will not work across the board for those 6 shots.
I did my Famous Five video many years back when I was incorrectly using a CTE 30 sight line as a 15. That was a growing pains mistake. I learned from it.
I have dedicated an entire chapter in my book as a study for the 5 shots, not 6.
The solutions will be in my book.
Put your solutions down. They’ll hold here just fine until my book is released.
Those shots were a tough study.
Critics of mine, if you know the solutions, fire away. Like I said, your answers will keep right here just fine.
Stan Shuffett
just clearing it up
With all due respect, we were telling you at least 5 years ago it was impossible to make all 5 of those shots with the same ETA inside pivot, even if Scarlett still says he can do it. Would have been nice to acknowledge this years ago and save a lot of arguing. All you could muster back then was to say,"There were problems with that video but the information was still essentially right." or something equally strange and vague.
why cant i make it with an inside A? whats the difference between the last and 2nd last shot, explain why i cant in your words and your reasoning ... im not trying to teach the system and staying in a lane like stan has too
i will be waiting dan for an answer *wink
It's not that complicated. An inside A is an inside A and will yield a particular shot angle no matter where the balls are on the table. IMO, the only reason CTE "works" is because if you pick the right perception and the right pivot it will get you close, just like ghost ball will. From there it requires the player's feel developed over time to tweak the shot either prior to set up or even during the stroke to pocket the ball.
It's not that complicated. An inside A is an inside A and will yield a particular shot angle no matter where the balls are on the table. IMO, the only reason CTE "works" is because if you pick the right perception and the right pivot it will get you close, just like ghost ball will. From there it requires the player's feel developed over time to tweak the shot either prior to set up or even during the stroke to pocket the ball.
Yep....I was hoping they would give me the lines ups for the picture I presented. I had a couple questions for them...silence...
You get the feeling their affraid of the truth.
affraid of ....? lets hear your questions
Are you kidding?? post you line ups...I'll give you the question.
i will go with an inside A across the board, ok lets hear your questions
Are you adjusting as your creating more of a cut??