Interior Dimensions of 8’ and 9’ Tables

[Brookeland Bill]

I’m working on a project dealing with shot angles and would like to have someone post the interior dimensions in inches of a standard 8’ and 9’ table cushion edge to cushion edge lengthwise ad widthwise. This has nothing to do with the aiming thread forum. It has more to do with CTE or any other formulated or mechanical aiming system. Thanks.

 

[Texas Carom Club]

 

[pt109]

The playing surface of an oversized 4x8 is 92 x 46

 

[Bob Jewett]

The playing surface of an oversized 4x8 is 92 x 46

The other problem with that list of table sizes is that there are multiple sizes of "seven foot" tables in the US.

 

[Patrick Johnson]

The other problem with that list of table sizes is that there are multiple sizes of "seven foot" tables in the US.

And a couple of Playing Area Dimensions aren't 2x1. Here's another list of tables with their playing area dimensions.

pj
chgo

 

[Renegade_56]

standard 8’ and 9’ table cushion edge to cushion edge lengthwise ad widthwise

The list includes standard 8 ft and 9 ft, which is all he asked for. Thank "Texas Carom Club" for that.

 

[Brookeland Bill]

And a couple of Playing Area Dimensions aren't 2x1. Here's another list of tables with their playing area dimensions.

pj
chgo

View attachment 624032

Thanks.

 

[Cornerman]

Yeah, let's delete everything on the right side of the charcoal column since it's all wrong.

 

[Texas Carom Club]

i dont know what i was thinking

 

[MurrayNevada]

8' Pro-Am: 45"x90"
9' Pro-Am: 50"x100"

 

[iusedtoberich]

That's about the worst table chart I've ever seen. Burn that thing.

 

[Texas Carom Club]

That's about the worst table chart I've ever seen. Burn that thing.

Kool story show a "good" one already

 

[Patrick Johnson]

Yeah, let's delete everything on the right side of the charcoal column since it's all wrong.

Here's the chart from above with some room size calculations (assuming a typical 58" cue).

pj
chgo

 

[iusedtoberich]

Kool story show a "good" one already

Patrick's is correct.

I find it amazing all these years these horrible charts from retail stores come up in all the google searches, but the correct charts from members on here do not. The knowledge in this forum is second to none, but doesn't get captured when someone does a google search.

 

[Texas Carom Club]

Patrick's is correct.

I find it amazing all these years these horrible charts from retail stores come up in all the google searches, but the correct charts from members on here do not. The knowledge in this forum is second to none, but doesn't get captured when someone does a google search.

Another Kool story

 

[Cornerman]

Patrick's is correct.

I find it amazing all these years these horrible charts from retail stores come up in all the google searches, but the correct charts from members on here do not. The knowledge in this forum is second to none, but doesn't get captured when someone does a google search.

Ditto. We still have member who have been here for 10 or 15 years that still put out these terrible charts despite real answers being provided for 20+ years.