Just going by what LFigueroa said, it's kind of funny how things change:
Jul 30 2021
"Yes, Arnaldo, the compensation structure will be publicly known before the first attempt is made.
I've seen the payout schedule and it is generous. Very generous."
Jul 20 2021:
"It is my understanding that JS had that table especially set up for high runs."
May 14 2021
"I don’t think anyone can have a problem with “perfect conditions.”"
May 12 2021
"It took him hundreds of tries under artificially perfect conditions. There is zero chance he is going to walk into a strange room for an exhibition and run 500+ in front of spectators, on any size table, on a single attempt." Lou may have referring to Schmidt, but also to Shaw.
Feb 17 2020
"Because, then we're into territory where the run is questionable, at least to me, in terms of the conditions being artificially perfect -- much like the guy who recently broke the marathon record. If conditions were constructed to provide an artificial advantage not encountered in normal play then I think we're talking about a big asterisk. Otherwise, the next guy is going to wear a fan on his head to blow the balls into the pockets and its going to be OK."
Feb 05 2020
"Want a BCA record: have the PR guy and another guy who's background is race tracks OK it.
Piece of cake.
Lou Figueroa
not
worth
the
paper
it's
printed
on?"
Apr 30 2021
"The fact of the matter is that not all affidavits are created equal. Just as not all evidence is created equal. And the same can be said of witnesses. Each must be weight individually on their merits and faults."
I had a laugh when i heard that the Legends group was providing an affidavit, and was sending it to the BCA so they could certify it. As Lou says, the merits of the witnesses must we weighed individually on their merits and faults. We can believe the witnesses might have been in the room, but with the multiple scoring errors, they weren't paying attention. Someone must have elbowed them and said, 'he just set a record - you're a witness'.
My favourite scoring error is the the run where the scorekeeper double counted one rack, then a couple of racks later, the scoreboard incremented in the middle of the rack, then a few racks later, changed by six. Good quality witnesses who didn't notice any of that!!
Bobby changed his mind on revealing the payouts. His dough, his decision.
True statement: JS table was set up for high runs.
Another true statement re perfect conditions.
I was referring to John and that would be another true statement.
Yet, apparently everyone, to include the BCA was OK with the conditions, artificially perfect or not. Ergo it would make no sense to handicap ourselves by doing otherwise.
I can’t address the one about the certification process at this time because of an agreement made a couple of days ago. Perhaps we can come back to that one soon.
On scoring errors, they were inadvertent and the crew got better at it as we went along.
Lou Figueroa