Shots in doubles, Active vs Passive

hang-the-9

AzB Silver Member
Silver Member
There is a thread in the Rules section about playing 10 ball where a ball was made in the wrong pocket, the question was "if the other team passes on the shot, does the player that just shot shoot again or does the partner shoot"? https://forums.azbilliards.com/threads/10-ball-scotch-doubles-question.545077/

My view was that the partner should shoot in this case since the other player already took his shot and missed, the fact you can give the shot back in the 10 ball rules should not change that.

This caused me to think of, what I think, is a good way to classify what shots are considered passed or given to the same player and what shots are shot by the next person in line. Active shots and Passive shots. Passive shots are those that do not actively take place in a game as a turn, so a lag, coin flip, or a push-out are Passive. One determines who breaks, the push out is a special shot that is done to setup the game start. Active shots are when someone tries to make a ball, plays a safe or commits a foul. Once a player executes an Active shot, their turn is done no matter what happens after that or what the other team does.

A Passive shot has not yet formed an order so if someone lags and wins the lag, either player can choose to break. Otherwise if we look at a lag, is the lag a shot? If it is, then the next player has to break since the lagger just shot. So if we classify the lag as Passive, we now have a reason and a "rule" to go by when picking who shoots next. For the push-out, it's a passive shot in the sense the push-out is itself a unique special shot where the player executing it waits for the opponent to decide who shoots. So with a push-out, it can also be a passive shot, where the player that pushed out is still at the table for his turn but without the need to move to the next player in line, the push-out in doubles would go back to whoever just shot it. The Passive shot of a push-out has not determined that the player did a shot as defined by this idea so does not have to leave the table for his partner to take the shot if it's passed and it just goes back to the player at the table.

I know this sounds a bit like a PoolKillers post with a bit of a new rule and terms for shots, but I really think this would simplify the thinking and decision making of doubles play.
 
Last edited:
In AZ they say if player A pushes, and the shot is given back, player B shoots. I don't like that.
 
In AZ they say if player A pushes, and the shot is given back, player B shoots. I don't like that.

Yes because there is no classification of the shot, and there is something in the logic of a push out going to the next player that is flawed. With classifying shots in terms where the rotation happens to the next player or not, there is less of a need for a place to place rule for doubles play, it can be done through logic of the shot type. So we are not really going by this shot you do this, that shot you do this, you place the shots in categories and then the logic of the categories determines what happens. Did you shoot an Active shot? Then your turn is over. Did you shoot a Passive shot, then it's not or it's flexible depending on the situation. Game not started, either player can shoot on a Passive shot. Game started, the player at the table shoots after a Passive shot since they are actively in the middle of the game and since the shot was Passive it does not go back to the partner.
 
There is a thread in the Rules section about playing 10 ball where a ball was made in the wrong pocket, the question was "if the other team passes on the shot, does the player that just shot shoot again or does the partner shoot"? https://forums.azbilliards.com/threads/10-ball-scotch-doubles-question.545077/

My view was that the partner should shoot in this case since the other player already took his shot and missed,
Player A and C are on one team, player B and D are on the other.

Player A takes a shot, and the conclusion of that shot is that his inning has come to an end.

Due to the manner in how player A's inning ended, it is now players B's shot--but Player B is allowed to pass (due to circumstances)

So, Player C's inning begins.

Can we agree that player A's inning has ended ?
We cannot disagree that Player B has passed--beginning and ending his inning without taking a stroke !
Thus, Player C is up.
 
This means the player giving the shot back has had a turn without shooting...hmmm
They play where once you hit the cue ball, your turn is over. Also, the other team can choose which player shoots first either way for their first turn at the table.
 
Back
Top