Make up your mind how many times you need to reply, the first short one wasn't too good
This one's A little better after a few days of thinking it over
Is Schmidt's and charlie 626 Legit
- Thread starter Dan Harriman
- Start date
- Status
This one's A little better after a few days of thinking it over
Peeing the bed? They have adult diapers you know
Well I certainly wont ever speak for Danny however, there is plenty shady about the 626 run. Im sure you know quite a few things that are not on the square with Schmidt. If you dont know im sure it would easy to put a list together for everyone to see. I personally have been sent 7 different video clips of Schmidt cheating and can provide links to the video clips and also many stories from top players and even multiple World Champions. I know 1st hand after dealing with the BCA directly how the 626 got approved and it was not on the square.I have witnessed many things by ol Schmitty myself also.
Last edited:
This is your buddy speaking...
Post in thread 'Is Schmidt's and charlie 626 Legit' https://forums.azbilliards.com/threads/is-schmidts-and-charlie-626-legit.506237/post-7344735
Danny has made up shit because i told him he was not qualified to play in my event on the 1st tier because he hasnt won a world championship. After I told him thst he asked about expenses being paid and I told him he would hsve to pay his own expenses and he hung up on me and flipped his wig ever since then. I do have to agree with him on the 626 as i have stated. As for him questing Jaysons run to be edited he can get 50-1 on any money he can cone up with and we can bet it up. Fortunately for him he is broke so all he will be anle to do is just talk shit. Maybe his backer can put up some money but i doubt it but my offer last forever to him or anyone else.
Underling...?
What do YOU know about that!?!?
Question was complex for you, I see.
Your delusion is impressive.
I respectfully disagree wit u - in bobby's cue it up podcast "recent news that Jason's 14.1 was lowered from 741 to 669" at 3:55 he stated - and these are his words - "the only thing we did to that table was put new facings in the pockets" so he never mentioned anything about any 'new rail cushions' in this podcast - so in lieu of this podcast - you r wrong. As u know lou - the facings are not considered apart of the rail - or banks would count off the point - get my point? So last time I checked the facing rubber and the rail rubber - were to separate pieces. If he would have changed the legs of the table for his aesthetic reasons i.e. lighting - that would have been Ok, but changing out the pocket facings from the 'original factory facings specs' - is what he did - and that is very questionable. Those facings had zero bounce to em - only a thud that slowed the object ball down - creating a vaccum/gutter style pocket - no bueno.
He also mentioned - in his first con' to me me on the phone - that he used to sell pool tables for many years - and that he knew how to make a table play real easy' and that he thought I would run a 1000 balls on this table. In his cue it up podcast - there is no mention of him changing out the actual rail cushions - only the pocket facings - so you r wrong on that - Lou. I do not doubt that jason ran the 669 on the circus soft foam facings/ dry rot rubber chamberalin pockets - but since he did foul on object ball and pocket facings were replaced - I do not consider that to be Legit either? Also I do not believe Jason when he stated in his interview that he did not feel the foul. he did feel the object ball foul with his cue - and kept going as there was no 'Set Standard' at the time (maybe still is not if bca is in charge) for 14.1 top run challenge. You and bobby knew there was no standard at the time too. Also I never claimed my 351 to be a 'live streamed performance' as chamberlain has tried to do - without success. In my 351 the table had not been altered in any way - but as u know I am not hear to talk about my game. Kinda odd that every one here in Missouri that was watching ya'lls podcast - lost stream during the two lesions' of pocket billiards circus pockets records 669 vs 714? I think we have learned that when the story changes - during close inspection - there is usually a problem - with the original story being told. Ruslan saw a ball drop - that he knew he had clearly missed - down the rail, after that ball dropped I think Ruslan (Champion) was aware the table was gaffed up and did not really care to play on that equip, Shane VanBoning (Champion) has practice very little 14.1 compared to myself - that is a fact. As for bobby's 311 CLAIM on the Diamond - without video evidence - the only way I would believe that - is if he were the table mechanic. It is interesting thought that he shares the high run claim on his avatar without any shred of video documentation - not sure why he is upset at j.s - as he is just following suit. Also if u were not there at the chamberlain event - in person - there is no way that u can be sure it was a live performance, other than accepting chamberlain's word - that is worth nothing.
Last edited:
I really think as time flows on many of these company's that claim to have new records - during the plandemic' Nike's claim of kipchoge surpassing the two hr marathon barrier, the dude swimming with females in olympics, and of course j.s./bca/c.w. - 626 - all will be labeled as phony - as they should be. I am an avid runner - Kipchoge did not surpass the two hr barrier in the Marathon - under traditional race format, nor did j.s. or Shaw surpass Mosconi's 526. These records are not Legit, nor will they ever be. I am currently looking into how many other phony records were pitched at the public - through crooked journalist - a midst the distraction of plandemic'. We can call them 'plandemic records' - they deserve their own special title - even though those who try and sell their pitch are not very special at all. Interchangeable pacemakers - as the only other runners = cheating and no new Legit record? Non original factory spec super soft pocket facings and loss of stream to over 90% of viewing audience - during the claim = cheating and no new record. Shaw's current p.b with this new table (that may or may not have been altered) ='s 510 - last time I checked that was less than 526 - lol Mosconi's run is still relevant - believe it or not.
Last edited:
Damn, just minutes late and I missed the
Unedited versions of these comments
Unedited versions of these comments
These comments have clearly been doctored
telinoz
Registered
Is there video footage of that?
Chortle.
That's right, dance as I pull your strings
....Just like the pied Piper
Led rats though the streets....
- Status