Guy Manges
Registered
Can a player hit down on a ball without it being a double hit ? Like when the cue ball is close to the OB...
1/4" apart, No angel of cut... ?Depends on how close together they are and the angle of cut
Absolutely Wright... GuyI took this up with Dr Dave and Bob Jewett IIRC on my first post here and while it was agreed that many times, contiguous contacts from tip though cue ball through object ball could occur, these would be considered legal if shot sufficiently off center; either horizontally or vertically.
That sounds weird to me. Is this written anywhere?I took this up with Dr Dave and Bob Jewett IIRC on my first post here and while it was agreed that many times, contiguous contacts from tip though cue ball through object ball could occur, these would be considered legal if shot sufficiently off center; either horizontally or vertically.
Written in the World Pool Rules.That sounds weird to me. Is this written anywhere?
Suppose you shoot a ball nearly frozen to the cue ball at 85 degrees or so. There is the possibility of contiguous contact that isn't considered a foul. If cue ball and object ball are frozen there will always be contiguous contact and shooting through the balls is allowed. Double hits can occur but are difficult to detect.Written in the World Pool Rules.
Double hits are a foul.
I understand that, thank you. But does it say that if you put enough spin on the ball then it's not a foul? The sentence I am referring to in my post, in my opinion, is too vague to mean to mean anything. Is the rule really that subjective?Written in the World Pool Rules.
Double hits are a foul.
I wasn't referring to english per se; mostly off the line of centers formed by the balls in question.I understand that, thank you. But does it say that if you put enough spin on the ball then it's not a foul? The sentence I am referring to in my post, in my opinion, is too vague to mean to mean anything. Is the rule really that subjective?
Ok, who decides what is "sufficiently off center". When the inevitable disagreement arises, there is not a definite answer because "sufficiently off center" cannot be pinned down and therefore cannot be defined in a rule.I wasn't referring to english per se; mostly off the line of centers formed by the balls in question.
So it`s like Humbert Humbert, you know it when you see it.Go to YouTube and watch Tony Chohan play some one pocket. Watch his execution. It’s about short jab and execution.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
And .. can a player Get DownCan a player hit down
Texas Express I believe attempted to clarify this with the terms "down" and "away". Dr Dave has identified the forensic evidence on double hits. I have not read or heard of any way to call anything but obvious bad hits.Ok, who decides what is "sufficiently off center". When the inevitable disagreement arises, there is not a definite answer because "sufficiently off center" cannot be pinned down and therefore cannot be defined in a rule.
That's not the actual, official rule, of course, nor does it eliminate double hits.we use a simple rule: if the balls are less than a chalk-cube apart you have to shoot at an angle or jack way up. pretty much eliminates all bitching/whining about a double-hit.
Very difficult, if not impossible for most not to foul.1/4" apart, No angel of cut... ?
Depends on how far you need to send object ball and your skills.Very difficult, if not impossible for most not to foul.