Well, he at least knew that there were two separate individuals that only viewed about half the run each,
Bet that was a surprise to you.
Is Schmidt's and charlie 626 Legit
- Thread starter Dan Harriman
- Start date
- Status
Bet that was a surprise to you.
If he lived in Pennsylvania, he would be the type to vote for Fetterman and the Democratic state assemblyman who died a month before the mid-terms.
dquarasr
Registered
I suppose he also believes a recent nationwide election was stolen because there are so many people saying it.
telinoz
Registered
He does.
Justanothercultist
which country is the election in?
how do you know english?
From cableshows, music and pool commentary.
Finding new ways to sell pool tables, that is what it boils down too.
I'll make it simple. If you think Shaws run is fake I'll put up 100k in cash to your 5k in cash and we can get any video experts in the world to examine the video. We can up the bet to you putting up to your 20k to my 1,000,000 in cash? Do we have a deal? If not you should stop the nonsense.
This is the exact type of thinking Danny is talking about.
Just because it was published in the newspaper and endorsed by businesses that are paid to promote "services/records" is the problem.
Not everyone can afford to pay a newspaper to print a story.
Shaws run was unedited and you or anyone else can bet your life on it because I'll bet my life on it. As for the 626 that's what is in question. What everyone should be asking themselves is why isn't the unedited 626 or even an edited version available to the public. Schmidt had no issues making money selling dvds on many other runs and live streaming other runs.
I am asking Mr Harriman on a different section if he wants to release a book.
People that can read are a better audience than people that only watch videos.
Let's talk after some sales have been made.
Quantitative Analysis of a 626 run
Low estimate 5 seconds per shot for a 626 run takes 3130 seconds = 52 minutes
High estimate 40 seconds per shot for a 626 run takes 25040 s = 417 min = 7 hours
To not make one calculation error for 626 shots in 52 minutes of intense shooting or 7 hours of relaxed shooting is the issue. If the player is being assisted by computer software identifying shots for the run than is that allowed for a "BCA record."
Pool players are great but there are limits. Danny clearly identified an upper limit for 14.1 runout, I agree.
Low estimate 5 seconds per shot for a 626 run takes 3130 seconds = 52 minutes
High estimate 40 seconds per shot for a 626 run takes 25040 s = 417 min = 7 hours
To not make one calculation error for 626 shots in 52 minutes of intense shooting or 7 hours of relaxed shooting is the issue. If the player is being assisted by computer software identifying shots for the run than is that allowed for a "BCA record."
Pool players are great but there are limits. Danny clearly identified an upper limit for 14.1 runout, I agree.
Make sure to include the mug shot in the book, probably should be the cover, don't you think?
No one saw hi runs as a marketable commodity until Brunswick, and guess who supported it as an accomplishment worth promoting.
How many balls a player could hold in one hand is a record still held by Mike Massey?
Records like that are easy to proven because a big hand takes more balls.
But a 14.1 high run, thats more like setting a record that only happens from competition.
You dont hear basketball players saying they made 100% shots for 500 practice three pointers. They only show their practice during a competition.
Or baseball players saying they bat 1.000 practicing against the machine.
Dan the silent majority is with you.
Pool has a history and tradition of poorly choosing statistics to publish.
Check out Pat Fleming he is a innovator and knows more than the BCA cheats.
Records like that are easy to proven because a big hand takes more balls.
But a 14.1 high run, thats more like setting a record that only happens from competition.
You dont hear basketball players saying they made 100% shots for 500 practice three pointers. They only show their practice during a competition.
Or baseball players saying they bat 1.000 practicing against the machine.
Dan the silent majority is with you.
Pool has a history and tradition of poorly choosing statistics to publish.
Check out Pat Fleming he is a innovator and knows more than the BCA cheats.
And yet you confirm high runs are staged because "people on the interweb say so", what are you smoking anyways???
Great idea. You should go completely dark until some sales have been made.
- Status