Is Schmidt's and charlie 626 Legit

Status
Not open for further replies.
I think we know where the newsletter title came from.
a1ac742c1603a371ecf413e9c2746762.jpg
d82ee3d85e897dc60978112477d70d0a.jpg


Sent using Tapatalk
 
logical said:
I have no idea what Jumble you are talking about. Everything you write is a jumble.

You posted a single "article". This is about that. Try to stay focused.

Sent using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
I hope there is a hidden literary joke in there. That would actually be pretty cool.
And I hope the joke isn't just content-related.
 
A high run record based on hours played is a step down from the 1000 ball count.

There might be tournament play benefits if someone could figure out faster ways to run racks in 14.1.

Currently Earl has the best idea on offense only 14.1 competition play.
 
justnum said:
A high run record based on hours played is a step down from the 1000 ball count.

There might be tournament play benefits if someone could figure out faster ways to run racks in 14.1.

Currently Earl has the best idea on offense only 14.1 competition play.
Click to expand...
My entire base of knowledge about 14.1 comes from watching "The Hustler" 45 years ago...and I still know more than you.

Sent using Tapatalk
 
  • Haha
Reactions: ACL
Dan Harriman said:
I disagree - u find it relevant or u would not be posting in this thread. If u think the legions of circus pockets without official specs is valid - u r delusional. That outfit is a castle in the sand acl, so again lou and chamberlain have not been issued any official pocket specs from the bca or any other credible pocket Billiard source - this makes all the difference in the world. Jason Shaw has always been cool genuine fellow and so I have no bad comments to make about him, I am sure he was well compensated for competeing' at the legions of circus pockets. I actually misspelled competing at the beginning but decided to leave it - as again I believe there to be zero accountability for pocket size at lesions of 14.1 - thus any engineered record from them is null and void - without an official pocket spec. set standard.
Click to expand...
We will agree to disagree as we have throughout our spirited debate (for lack of a better word).

To my knowledge, they have posted the specs that Jayson set the record on and you have dismissed them. The BCA doesn't have any standards so I still don't understand the issue. If the governing (and I use that word VERY loosely) body certified the run, then it stands. Using logic, that means that Schmidt's 'record' has been broken and is now irrelevant.
 
ACL said:
We will agree to disagree as we have throughout our spirited debate (for lack of a better word).

To my knowledge, they have posted the specs that Jayson set the record on and you have dismissed them. The BCA doesn't have any standards so I still don't understand the issue. If the governing (and I use that word VERY loosely) body certified the run, then it stands. Using logic, that means that Schmidt's 'record' has been broken and is now irrelevant.
Click to expand...

What would the top 10 high records be?
Jayson
John
Willie
...
D Harriman
D Barouty
M Immonen
T Hohmann

A ranking list, shows the deviation of performances. It is much better than a single high run record holder.
 
xradarx said:
You don’t know jackshit about 14.1 Continuous Billiards or much about any other game of pocket pool or you would be out playing instead of running only your mouth.
Click to expand...

I have a real job and you are not insulting me by telling me I don't know crap about straight pool. So why are you even here other than to lick DH's nether region?

You and Justnum make quite a couple.

Sent using Tapatalk
 
Last edited:
  • Haha
Reactions: ACL
lfigueroa said:
You are now quoting stuff so old it has lost it's context -- what do you do, just log on and randomly go any page of this 300+ page waste of time?

Lou Figueroa
Click to expand...
I am sure u have a much different opinion bout the bca now than when u posted yer comment bout the bca certification - not being all it's cracked up to be. As yer precious bca committee has been so forthright in acknowledging u'r request for official pocket specs. Now that is - Hyperbowle - Mr. figueroa.
 
ACL said:
Wow. I wished I lived in the fantasyland that you did sport.

I admitted that I didn't see it.

I then made a declaration that I didn't doubt that it was the record. I will look up the post for you so you don't have to tax that addled brain of yours.
Click to expand...
It's OK acl. but yer reading retention is another thing that u do not do as well - as me.
 
ACL said:
The BCA doesn't have any standards so I still don't understand the issue.
Click to expand...
Yes u do understand the issue, but I get it ur right we can agree to disagree. U and the bca have much in common, all yer about is documentation - and could care less about actual table specs. This is cause yer not a good player and more into selling the open public yer phony records that are performed on doctored tables - with altered pocket facings.
 
ACL said:
it shouldn't matter what the specs are as long as the run is documented.
Click to expand...
Bzzt - wrong again yer - claiming here that 9" pockets would suffice. But yea that fits into yer narrative - as the bca will not issue ya'll any official specs for 14.1 continuous. Using this logic it would not matter what size the table is - let alone deviating the pocket facings to accept nearly any poor hit ball. I think I just described the legends of pool billiards equip there in D.C. area, we know chamberlain has altered the pocket facings - is that table even a true 9 footer?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top