Is Schmidt's and charlie 626 Legit

Status
Not open for further replies.
Dan Harriman said:
I have already posted the evidence of chamberlain saying just that on his podcast, he stated and these are his words " the only thing I did to that table was put new facings in the pockets." end quote Redhawk or myself will gladly pull that up for u - as u seem remise in not having read this entire thread.
Click to expand...
And in this entire thread they posted with a follow up statement of, new facings with standard 60 Shore A hardness.... just like any other table.

It is funny reading your post, having a go at @ACL
For not reading the entire thread, when the entire thread nullifies your GOTCHA moment.

What other hard evidence have you got Dan?

Earlier in this thread, when I was being more serious I explained your logic about this entire thing is flawed as in your own posted observations, there are no standard rules for exhibition 14.1 runs. Which includes table specs.
Not in Mosconi's time
Not in Schmidts time
Not in Shaw's time.

That is what this nothing burger comes down to..

But, we also established a long time ago on this thread that you are upset you didn't get an invite.
Obviously you hold a grudge, a huge chip on your shoulder.

Again, doesn’t matter as you have also been told how to fix that.
Yep, on this same thread.
Have a go at the record yourself.
Film it.
Post it.
Good luck.
 
aaronataylor said:
I had the pleasure of watching the 626 run on March 14th (last month) with John Schmidt himself and a few others. That's all the proof I need.
Congrats again to you, Mr. 626, for your historic accomplishment!

Danny - I have an authenticated piece of the actual Simonis cloth John Schmidt ran the 626 on. I'll sell it to you for $250. Message me if you're interested ;)
Click to expand...
What do u think that piece of cloth is worth now? Years upon years - and still no verifiable digital documentation to support john did run 626. I am sure yer apart of the pathetic Semi Public - I will send u a copy of my 351 (unedited for honesty purposes). Send me $500.00 and I send it right to yer door. Welcome to reality - u may want to find another arron to run.
 
xradarx said:
Add it to yer spellcheck.

Get out yer Funk&Wagnalls and lookup ‘exhibition’, since you and none of yer cronies seem to understand ‘English’(it ain’t spin).
Try to explain it after you figure out how either of these supposed hi-runs, meet that stat.
Click to expand...
Oh, one other thing Dan..

Stop using Alt accounts.
It is obvious and you know Mike doesn't allow that here... maybe you didn't know?
 
Dan Harriman said:
What do u think that piece of cloth is worth now? Years upon years - and still no verifiable digital documentation to support john did run 626. I am sure yer apart of the pathetic Semi Public - I will send u a copy of my 351 (unedited for honesty purposes). Send me $500.00 and I send it right to yer door. Welcome to reality - u may want to find another arron to run.
Click to expand...
just think of all that YOU could learn from johns big run cloth piece. i think you should take him up on the offer. if you truly are a true 14.1 continuous pocket billiard enthusiast and author/ historian
 
telinoz said:
And in this entire thread they posted with a follow up statement of, new facings with standard 60 Shore A hardness.... just like any other table.

It is funny reading your post, having a go at @ACL
For not reading the entire thread, when the entire thread nullifies your GOTCHA moment.

What other hard evidence have you got Dan?

Earlier in this thread, when I was being more serious I explained your logic about this entire thing is flawed as in your own posted observations, there are no standard rules for exhibition 14.1 runs. Which includes table specs.
Not in Mosconi's time
Not in Schmidts time
Not in Shaw's time.

That is what this nothing burger comes down to..

But, we also established a long time ago on this thread that you are upset you didn't get an invite.
Obviously you hold a grudge, a huge chip on your shoulder.

Again, doesn’t matter as you have also been told how to fix that.
Yep, on this same thread.
Have a go at the record yourself.
Film it.
Post it.
Good luck.
Click to expand...
Thank you kind sir! You are a gentleman and a scholar!
 
xradarx said:
Look in the lower left, see Report, it’s there for you disinterested accusers of multiple accounts. Stop with the bullsh*t accusations and get down to the real business of proof for your claims, or STHU.
Click to expand...
Post 6606...
Thanks for playing.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: ACL
xradarx said:
Post 6606...

C’est la vie.
FYI, OEM of tables have specs by which they manufacture the tables, which include the tolerances.
The table specs didn’t change for Mosconi, Schmidt, or Shaw, or others.
Just walk in, pick a table and play ball, meow.
Click to expand...
60

Shore A

Hardness

Say it slowly.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: ACL
xradarx said:
About as much as y’all learned from watching the Hustler movie over and over for forty-five rears or so.
Click to expand...
yea, danny needs alot of help to break that pesky 400 mark,
actually ill chip in for the fella, tell whoever send me the bill for the HISTORIC cloth, and ship it to the springfield pistol
 
  • Haha
Reactions: ACL
Dan Harriman said:
I may have some pit in me, was running not long ago and received a bite from 1 of the two pits chasing me - no leash on either? The liitle wolf pit was not full grown and could not get a good latch on my calf - I have heart shape in me calf from much running. It was not a fun experience but - I do bark at the moon now. I have already posted the evidence of chamberlain saying just that on his podcast - here on this forum - he stated and these are his words " the only thing I did to that table was put new facings in the pockets." end quote Redhawk or myself will gladly pull that up for u - as u'r constantly in remise - it would seem - from not having read this entire thread - or even the last 50 pages for that matter. If u need Redhawk, RADAR or myself to give u the link - we can do that.
Click to expand...

Danny, why do you behave as a small child who puts their hands over their ears and yells, “Ninny, ninny, ninny” over and over again so they don’t have to listen to what the adults in the room are saying.

Again, here’s the latest Bobby has said:

“So everyone knows the facings were 60 hardness the same as all Diamond tables and our current gold crown 4 is also done with 60 hardness facings.
Pockets were 4.9 corners and 5.3 sides.
Our gold crown 4 we are using now are 4.8 corners and 5.2 sides.”

Lou Figueroa
 
Last edited:
Fatboy said:
For sure. Which is cool. I never saw 14.1 in California ever during the 80’s & 90’s. Not once. In New York it’s common.

Point is some games have wider appeal than others. Nothing more nothing less. Which isn’t the topic here.

Using my posts as ammo for a secondary reason to take a shot at anyone ain’t cool.

Take all the shots you want-please read refrain from using my posts in such a manor. I’m asking in a polite respectful way to not do that. There’s plenty of other posts you can use for that purpose other than mine.

I’m cool with everyone here. I’m not supplying ammo.

Respectfully
Fatboy 😃😃
Click to expand...
I'll go back and revit the posts in context.

Sorry I made you feel used, m-man.
 
Cuedup said:
Th

The only "evidence" is that this type of accusation comes from a place in the accusers mind where that's what they would do if they were going to cheat the system.

Their accusations are confessions, as we see almost daily.
Click to expand...
It is definitely been noted up in hrrrre that he decries the exact behaviors he exhibits.
 
Y
lfigueroa said:
Danny, why do you behave as a small child who puts their hands over their ears and yells, “Ninny, ninny, ninny” over and over again so their don’t have to listen to what the adults in the room are saying.

Again, here’s the latest Bobby has said:

“So everyone knows the facings were 60 hardness the same as all Diamond tables and our current gold crown 4 is also done with 60 hardness facings.
Pockets were 4.9 corners and 5.3 sides.
Our gold crown 4 we are using now are 4.8 corners and 5.2 sides.”

Lou Figueroa
Click to expand...
Yeah, but if you disregard that...
 
lfigueroa said:
Danny, why do you behave as a small child who puts their hands over their ears and yells, “Ninny, ninny, ninny” over and over again so their don’t have to listen to what the adults in the room are saying.

Again, here’s the latest Bobby has said:

“So everyone knows the facings were 60 hardness the same as all Diamond tables and our current gold crown 4 is also done with 60 hardness facings.
Pockets were 4.9 corners and 5.3 sides.
Our gold crown 4 we are using now are 4.8 corners and 5.2 sides.”

Lou Figueroa
Click to expand...

Everyone "knowing" is calling it a cover up.

If the video does not lie, there would be a test and measurement of all physical conditions before the run, during the run and at the end of the run.

A lot can happen from under the table that the camera can't record or the camera can't display true differences within intervals of certain color values. There could be hidden panels where magic is happening while the camera is on.

If the evidence exists why wasn't it recorded. Again this a failure of the BCA to properly inform players of proper table conditions.

Next time some one wants to set a high run record, they can change the rails to have magnets, add some holes in the table to cheat the ball using pressurized air, film from a slanted camera angle to hide an unlevel table.

If the BCA were serious they would inform players on how to assess if a table is properly set up. Not just tell them to read a rule book and expect them to figure it out. This is not some college class.

14.1 high runs are about running balls, not finding the documented cases of ignorance by BCA bookmakers. Then exploiting those rules to create mythical pool runs.

As for the video with pocket facings, what players need are standard tools to assess and measure if a table has been set up properly. That includes the hardness of rails, the shelf of pockets and the angle cut of the pockets in addition to the allowable tolerance in ball weight and cloth speed.

There is a saying measure twice and cut once. When it comes to high runs, its don't measure, just believe.
 
lfigueroa said:
Danny, why do you behave as a small child who puts their hands over their ears and yells, “Ninny, ninny, ninny” over and over again so they don’t have to listen to what the adults in the room are saying.

Again, here’s the latest Bobby has said:

“So everyone knows the facings were 60 hardness the same as all Diamond tables and our current gold crown 4 is also done with 60 hardness facings.
Pockets were 4.9 corners and 5.3 sides.
Our gold crown 4 we are using now are 4.8 corners and 5.2 sides.”

Lou Figueroa
Click to expand...
This is correct Lou. We changed the facings because the ones that were on the table were old and we put on 60 hardness facings same as Diamond.
Danny Harriman if your reading these comments then read them and accept the truth.
Also Jayson Shaw said get a backer and bet as much as your backer can bet and play some sets of 14.1 or STFU.
As for justnum you don't know shit but you must like to get attention and argue.
 
justnum said:
Everyone "knowing" is calling it a cover up.

If the video does not lie, there would be a test and measurement of all physical conditions before the run, during the run and at the end of the run.

A lot can happen from under the table that the camera can't record or the camera can't display true differences within intervals of certain color values. There could be hidden panels where magic is happening while the camera is on.

If the evidence exists why wasn't it recorded. Again this a failure of the BCA to properly inform players of proper table conditions.

Next time some one wants to set a high run record, they can change the rails to have magnets, add some holes in the table to cheat the ball using pressurized air, film from a slanted camera angle to hide an unlevel table.

If the BCA were serious they would inform players on how to assess if a table is properly set up. Not just tell them to read a rule book and expect them to figure it out. This is not some college class.

14.1 high runs are about running balls, not finding the documented cases of ignorance by BCA bookmakers. Then exploiting those rules to create mythical pool runs.

As for the video with pocket facings, what players need are standard tools to assess and measure if a table has been set up properly. That includes the hardness of rails, the shelf of pockets and the angle cut of the pockets in addition to the allowable tolerance in ball weight and cloth speed.

There is a saying measure twice and cut once. When it comes to high runs, its don't measure, just believe.
Click to expand...
Just because the words go together doesn't make them truth.

You are talking fantasy. It the real world, the technology you allege possible does not exist.

The players do not have the resources or the incentive to develop or implement such a dastardly plan.

As a self proclaimed man of science, you really are missing a lot of crucial data.

Have you seen Jayson's record run?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top