Cue Ball Deflection

Brookeland Bill

AzB Silver Member
Silver Member
There are shots where I use the antipathy deflection path of the cue ball to determine where to strike the object ball keeping in mind the cue ball will come off at 90° to the intended path of the object ball.
 
There are shots where I use the antipathy deflection path of the cue ball to determine where to strike the object ball keeping in mind the cue ball will come off at 90° to the intended path of the object ball.
can you define " antipathy deflection path of the cue ball "
and why will the cue ball come off at 90 degress unless you hit it with stun or you mean for that millisecond before roll or draw takes over?
 
There are shots where I use the antipathy deflection path of the cue ball to determine where to strike the object ball keeping in mind the cue ball will come off at 90° to the intended path of the object ball.
A good example of the fact that we all visualize aim lines using some kind of memorized "reference" - you visualize the CB hitting the right place to produce the correct carom angle, I visualize the OB contact point and aim to hit it with the visualized CB contact point, others visualize where to aim the CB compared to a fractional OB division, etc. Surprisingly, none of these rely on precise visualization of the actual tangent/points/fraction - you only have to see it the same way each time - consistent visualization is the key.

pj
chgo
 
Last edited:
From some dictionary:

Antipathy: a feeling of strong dislike, opposition, or anger

I knew all along that Bill was saying he sometimes likes to use his strong dislike of the CB's deflection path to help aim certain shots. 😉

I get a bit antipathetic myself at the cb's deflection path when it surprisingly leads to a pocket after glancing off another ball by accident. But that's not part of any aiming method for me, except for carom shots I suppose.
 
A good example of the fact that we all visualize aim lines using some kind of memorized "reference" - you visualize the CB hitting the right place to produce the correct carom angle, I visualize the OB contact point and aim to hit it with the visualized CB contact point, others visualize where to aim the CB compared to a fractional OB division, etc. Surprisingly, none of these rely on precise visualization of the actual tangent/points/fraction - you only have to see it the same way each time - consistent visualization is the key.

pj
chgo
I agree. A lot of strong players say they aim center CB directly at the OB's geometric contact point rather then the center of the ghost ball--geometrically incorrect but works because they are consistent with head and eye placement and the (subconscious) adjustments made to score the ball.
 
There are shots where I use the antipathy deflection path of the cue ball to determine where to strike the object ball keeping in mind the cue ball will come off at 90° to the intended path of the object ball.

Huh? The tangent line is a property of the ob--not the angle of the shot. In other words, the tangent line is an unmoving static line for a given ob, and it does not change as the cb changes position. For instance, the ob's tangent line is the same for a 3/4 ball hit and a 1/4 ball hit. So, how would the tangent line help you determine where the cb should strike the ob?
 
Back
Top