I´ve used Taom´s since they were prototype and I did say after they released 1st one almost every pro will be using it if they can improve chalk little bit. v2.0 was better and then came Pyro.That is THE reason that everyone talks about as to why people use Taom. Occasionally you’ll hear people say they can get more spin; they’re probably the same people who say their carbon fiber cue gets them more spin.
I have seen people who miscue more often with Taom, so that might be a reason someone like SVB would stick with Masters. I don’t think most people have a problem, but who knows, maybe if you’re used to getting further out on the ball, the Taom miscues more. There must be a trade-off between less “stickiness” and more miscues vs more stickiness, fewer miscues, but more skids.
Finally came V10 and it is perfected Taom IMO. Works almost every tip. Most of pros are now using it.
There is still sometimes problems with it. Minor ones but some laminated tips reveal more glue between layers than others and when shaped.
Taom seem to be work some kind "burning" effect on softer surface. When it hits to hard spot on glue between layers, it can miscue easier.
Then chalk "burn" effect kinda swaps and stick very tight on cueball. I use Elk Master and very little problems with miscues for me but many players use harder laminated tips and those guys miscue more often that good traditional chalk.
This is only my observation over the years but that flaw is very minor and benefits are way better than flaws.