The cream rises to the top no matter the pocket size.I understand why the pros hate setups like this, but less tight tables would bring a greater number of players into contention, even just on a runner. It would be better for the game.
Would be better for the game in your opinion, the opinion of a struggling US or of everyone in the world?I understand why the pros hate setups like this, but less tight tables would bring a greater number of players into contention, even just on a runner. It would be better for the game.
I also grew up playing snooker. My suggestion is mostly for the US. At best pool is a participant/fan sport here. It's never going to compete with the NFL or other televised sports. It could succeed the way pickleball has, with big participation events that support pro events. DCC is almost the model. APA gets more people to Vegas to play pool each year than ESPN could get to watch pool on TV. Pro poker in the US does a similar trick. Get prospective fans to become players and then dedicated fans. If occasionally a punter got from the league night to the final table, there'd be a lot more engagement than yet another Fedor/Shane match.Would be better for the game in your opinion, the opinion of a struggling US or of everyone in the world?
Personally, I don't think big pockets at anything viable from a skill or financial/viewership aspect, but am always curious why people want bucket pockets.
So, would it simply be a case of it would be better for weaker players of the game, and thus encouraging a greater amount of people who consider themselves 'dedicated players'? (or would it be considered too easy to waste time on from cue sports enthusiasts?)
Would it really be better for TV audiences with some 'wonder shots' being more easily sunk, or would it be seen as a no-skilled hacks game... banging a ball around and knowing it's going somewhere?
As someone who grew up playing snooker, the tighter pockets make me feel better about playing (regardless of whether my dad still tells me it's a talentless game lol)
Cool. So let's speed up events and make more interesting shot making by enbiggening the pockets.The cream rises to the top no matter the pocket size.
Don’t threaten me with a good timeCool. So let's speed up events and make more interesting shot making by enbiggening the pockets.
Yes.Would it really be better for TV audiences with some 'wonder shots' being more easily sunk
Would this have been more fun to watch if the pockets were 4"?
Or AMF PlaymasterNormal Gold Crown of that era. New cloth = slick and easy.
The MLB has gone completely in this direction. They don't think anyone is watching whole baseball games, but they are maximizing SoMe content, gambling, highlights, fan interaction etc.Yes.
Realistically, you have to have more skill than the other player, regardless of pocket size. And maybe for every unknown that goes on a heater, there's someone else that sits in their chair watching Filler run out a set. I do honestly believe that the highlight reel shots can generate some interest in the game. How many shots from the top tournaments do you think are highlight material? Not to us, who know how difficult it is, but to someone watching sportscenter. I think the circus shots make the game exciting and are important.
The problem is that the pros have gotten so good that the pockets had to be tightened up, reducing the spectacular shots, and hoping the consequences for a missed one.
Depending on where I am playing, most halls here have 4.25" standard. 4.5" is mostly found in the bar. There is only one Hall I have been to that had 4 x 4.5" tables (sat lonely amongst three rooms worth of Chinese-8 tables).4.5 is a good compromise, tough enough for better players but still doable for bangers. In a poolroom anything smaller than 4.5 is no good imo. Might have 1-2tables smaller for better players but not all of them.
Pickleball makes me want to vomit. How on earth that ever became popular is anyone's gue....oh wait, it's not a guess. It's middle-class morons lapping up expensive tat - I guess in the past, pool is to snooker, what pickleball is to tennis...Although, I wouldn't put it in the same category now.I also grew up playing snooker. My suggestion is mostly for the US. At best pool is a participant/fan sport here. It's never going to compete with the NFL or other televised sports. It could succeed the way pickleball has, with big participation events that support pro events. DCC is almost the model. APA gets more people to Vegas to play pool each year than ESPN could get to watch pool on TV. Pro poker in the US does a similar trick. Get prospective fans to become players and then dedicated fans. If occasionally a punter got from the league night to the final table, there'd be a lot more engagement than yet another Fedor/Shane match.
"Where'd all the characters go?" They say.
Well, if you tighten the game up so you need better than 20/20 vision and the steadiness of a competition pistol shooter a lot of the characters aren't going to make the final 16.
I grew up in Dorset, then southern VA, playing at Q Masters. Pickleball the game has nothing to do with my point, which is that as a business, pool will only succeed if it can turn players into spectators. The game itself isn't visually exciting when played at the highest levels on tight equipment, especially to non-players. Opening it up makes more story lines possible. It also ups the highlights for SoMe consumption. Think about the stories that come out of the practice room at DCC. Scooter's antics are much more engaging than the one pocket final, and I love one pocket.Depending on where I am playing, most halls here have 4.25" standard. 4.5" is mostly found in the bar. There is only one Hall I have been to that had 4 x 4.5" tables (sat lonely amongst three rooms worth of Chinese-8 tables).
The hall I go to the most often has 16 x 4.25" and then also has 4 x 4.125" and one Diamond 4" - the other branch of this company I go to sometimes has 16 x 4.25" 4 x Chinese-8 and one Diamond 4" - I haven't been to their 3rd store.
I think 4.25" is pretty much the standard here (and can be seen across at least three chains that operate in the city, and some smaller halls), and 4.5" gets treated with a bit of a disdain... People here do have a very different idea of what 'good' looks like, or what 'hard' is. They also are much, much quicker to adopt the most popular, or newest things (MR break box, grey cloth, black balls etc etc)
Pickleball makes me want to vomit. How on earth that ever became popular is anyone's gue....oh wait, it's not a guess. It's middle-class morons lapping up expensive tat - I guess in the past, pool is to snooker, what pickleball is to tennis...Although, I wouldn't put it in the same category now.
Thanks for adding your perspective, definitely see what you are saying in some areas. It's a really complicated balance between; what is watchable? to who is it watchable? is it playable? to who is it playable? is smaller making progress? to who is it progress?
Where did you grow up? I wish I grew up somewhere with access to 9ft pool tables and snooker, I feel I probably would have gravitated towards it much earlier.