Playing Under the Influence

Peronsally I don't find any mind altering chemicals an improvement to my game. If I can't win straight, I sure as hell ain't gonna win stoned.

I play with a guy that plays pretty darn sporty, real good, but his game usually drops a ball or so after a couple of trips out to the parking lot.

To each his own. I'm glad they finally started legalizing weed. I've seen very few fights when folks were stoned, and tons of em when they were drunk. Everyone loves a loud obnoxious drunk. :wink:
 
I'm 68 been using 420 since 16. Use to shoot pool and very well in my younger days stoned. Wouldn't play with out it. Played golf with a game of very low 80's. Lit up a joint BOOM played nearly scratch of mid 70's. I think it depends on the person. Some can play with it some can't even hold a stick while stoned.

But one thing is for sure. I never saw a cue ball or a white golf ball turn Orange or you know Cheetos dust. Come on VonRett what a 60's redneck neck thing to say Geez Oh Mercy
 
The problem in CA is that the local towns and cities are reticent to approve opening new or more dispensaries.
Since it is legal to grow up to six plants as an individual, folks with land are growing it everywhere in northern CA.
The green triangle is busting loose with buds galore and there is a surplus of marijuana driving down the price.

It is against the law to sell or ship any marijuana products outside CA so the state has a huge surplus of pot.
Eventually supply & demand will rectify the situation but presently, marijuana is plentiful, high quality & lower prices.
I submit shooting pool seriously is best performed clear minded but I’ll agree it might not be as enjoyable for some.
 
Do you play one pocket?

No, any rack of pool that can potentially take as long as a movie...I pass. Kinda surprised at the responses here. Weed is nothing like alcohol. Weed is nothing like anything. Its a miracle drug, it enhances everything has directly killed zero people. I use it for Poker and billiards. We could play a who invented game. Just two answers, God and man. Which list does weed make?
 
Last edited:
It always makes me laugh when men lose their self restraint in principle for what they deem to be civilly engaged and therefore are natural....
 
Just an FYI, when pot was legalized here it (in California and locally) seemed like everybody was trying it. Now in our neiborhood, it's pretty much died back to the same people who were using it before it was legal.

At this stage, pot is kind of a bust. Here's the stock chart on Aurora Cannabis. I know many people who have lost many kilo's of money on cannabis investments. The same analysts who were screaming "Buy,Buy,Buy!" a year ago at $10 a share are now screaming "Sell, Sell, Sell!" at $1.75 a share.
No, it wasn't so much of a customer base derivative as it was more so a dynamic of supply and demand.

The legalized beginnings, ranged a far less supply vs demand ratio in which,

slowly over time to the present,

produced a supply chain INVENTORY

and,

unit price inversion TRAJECTORY that exponentially over shot what is arguably more demand now than the beginning as you theorize.

A ominous double cross of drifting unit price inversion to a upward creation of supply chain and thus the double or multiplying Factor of inverse mobility.

Your stock chart of example indicates a stock price trend of a artificially controlled drift in my opinion for what normally would be a typical insight in advance and thus somewhere in that charted history would be a sharp overnight decline for what was obviously visible ahead of time from $10 to $1.75.... that is not my opinion, that is simple market fact that does not correlate with that chart... just saying.

Whoever these people are you mentioned about big losses, are not savvy investors....suckers in fact.
 
Last edited:
No, it wasn't so much of a customer base derivative as it was more so a dynamic of supply and demand.

The legalized beginnings, ranged a far less supply vs demand ratio in which,

slowly over time to the present,

produced a supply chain INVENTORY

and,

unit price inversion TRAJECTORY that exponentially over shot what is arguably more demand now than the beginning as you theorize.

A ominous double cross of drifting unit price inversion to a upward creation of supply chain and thus the double or multiplying Factor of inverse mobility.

Your stock chart of example indicates a stock price trend of a artificially controlled drift in my opinion for what normally would be a typical insight in advance and thus somewhere in that charted history would be a sharp overnight decline for what was obviously visible ahead of time from $10 to $1.75.... that is not my opinion, that is simple market fact that does not correlate with that chart... just saying.

Whoever these people are you mentioned about big losses, are not savvy investors....suckers in fact.
So you’ve replied numerous times this morning to a 4 year old thread? Dabbling in the devils lettuce this morning?
 
No, it wasn't so much of a customer base derivative as it was more so a dynamic of supply and demand.

The legalized beginnings, ranged a far less supply vs demand ratio in which,

slowly over time to the present,

produced a supply chain INVENTORY

and,

unit price inversion TRAJECTORY that exponentially over shot what is arguably more demand now than the beginning as you theorize.

A ominous double cross of drifting unit price inversion to a upward creation of supply chain and thus the double or multiplying Factor of inverse mobility.

Your stock chart of example indicates a stock price trend of a artificially controlled drift in my opinion for what normally would be a typical insight in advance and thus somewhere in that charted history would be a sharp overnight decline for what was obviously visible ahead of time from $10 to $1.75.... that is not my opinion, that is simple market fact that does not correlate with that chart... just saying.

Whoever these people are you mentioned about big losses, are not savvy investors....suckers in fact.
Guys yelling buy and sell are paid to do it at the wrong times to mislead normies. That said, cannabis had a nice hype bubble with everyone piling in before legalization and then it's been a few years of a selloff. They in accumulation now tho. Aurora got as high as 1200 and was about 200 at time of Tate's post....maybe he moved decimals? Either way, when the guys were selling sell sell sell it was well over 100. It is $8 now. Good buy if you're into that sorta thing. Most cannabis stocks I pulled up since this thread and your post put them on my radar again look like they are in accumulation. I might even buy some lol.
 
Well I see 4 pages and only skimmed the first. For recreation smoking is fine. For competition it's better to wait until after.
An ancient story comes to mind. Playing in a 1 and 2 recreational ring game, an opponent that normally was my equal was well off his game. So joking I inquired, "what are you on and why aren't you sharing?" Without a word he reached in his pocket and pulled out his stealth pipe with a sliding cover. He could hit it at the table and have it back in his pocket undetected except by close observation. So he hands it to me. So I imitated his stealth technique and turned my back to the bar and hit it. I wasn't scared. 😉
Sure enough my game fell way off......but I didn't care. 🤷‍♂️ Oh that was Good stuff. 😉
Marijuana does come in lots of strains and some are more suitable for playing than others. I have yet to find one that enhances my play. Most however make for a fun day. 🤷‍♂️ Hmmm that reminds me, I haven't medicated yet today.
 
About a year ago, I was going to a weekly bar 8-ball tournament. One of the players was handing out THC gummies, so I took one. It was actually the first time I had a gummy even though I had an unopened bag in my desk for a while. Long and short was that I was baked out of my mind without the heavy or hot lung feeling. Kind of like doing a bong hit without the smoke. First couple of games, yeah... I wouldn't recommend it. But there was a stretch that lasted throughout the rest of the tournament that I was extremely focused, more focused in a tournament than I have been in over a decade. I won the tournament easily, but that could have been the THC fooling me.

Would I do it again? In a weekly bar tournament, sure. In a "real" tournament? I always drank at tournaments, so I suppose saying that I wouldn't do a gummy would seem silly. Maybe half a gummy.
 
But there was a stretch that lasted throughout the rest of the tournament that I was extremely focused, more focused
It can enhance my focus but it also inhibits my motivation and the long range problem solving. The minute details are clear and yet the big picture can become fuzzy .
 
legalization didn't change anything here. Gave cops something better to do, it never increased car accident stats. I know more people who are bothered by indoor cigarette smoking than pot smoking. I think it has more to do with doing what you are used to.. one beer will throw me off because I seldom drink. I know others who play fine after 6 , if they drink every day they are just in their normal state.. . will a joint throw off a seldom or non pot smoker, sure it will. An every day smoker, likely no notable change. Probably whats right for you is what you do now, whatever that is. I think if you are comfortable in your surroundings, or not... that makes more difference.. pot smoker don't stagger when they walk because it really doesnt; affect motor skills so much.. drunks stagger and slur their speech, some become obnoxious.. some are happy and just fine.. I've never seen anyone become stoned ( on weed) and obnoxious, maybe a bit silly.. perhaps forget their turn..maybe also set aside the mental stuff that was stressing them internally.. If it helps people sleep that can have positive health effects alone.
Amongst friends, its only the nose powder I'd worry about, so many addictive things out there nowadays that can get mixed in. I've seen that stuff ( or the resulting slippery slope ) turn peoples lives into garbage enough times that those quick trips to nose powder in the bathroom can be a bit worrying.
I've never met a person yet who destroyed their life or crashed their car by smoking weed. drinking , yes many.

I have a few friends who will drive after drinking and I dont know quite how to approach it, thought of maybe putting up a box with $50 cash and cab numbers, ( honor system? ) maybe that could encourage them not to drive home when too intoxicated. Sometimes I find myself wondering if I should interfere but I dont portray myself as the Barney Fife type either..

Maybe a breath checker could be part of a poolroom so you can check for yourself if you had too much to drink before driving.. I'm thinking that and cab numbers and possibly a clear ( breakable? ) container with some small amount of cash is a positive way, rather than ragging on people.. At least that paints a situation where there is an option if a person is too drunk , stoned etc.. I think many may just honor why the 50 bucks is there and respect it but it depends where it is.. Could be a sign that says ask the bar to call a cab if you think you are impaired..
Eating pot can make people unsafe to drive, as it can basically give you too much THC at once, whereas a smoker stops ( says enough - stops) or it stops affecting them when their receptors limit out.. but when it is injested there is no stopping because you feel you had enough,, it simply takes it's course.

I've seen lots of situations where people start cooking with it and then people are basically falling asleep having ate too large of a dose for them.. yes one brownie can take you down, so if you eat pot, be careful, its often so inconsistent.

If people smoke it and don't usually, then it affects them more because their tHC receptors are open.. thats why 1 beer affects me, no tolerance..
Then I think you can be impaired by it.

I think the only way a drink or a toke helps is if the person is used to it and then they are just basically their normal self.. Either is going to affect the intollerant and will throw them off..

maybe some need to question why they play, if its to have fun, That's different from serious competition..
If you enjoy to have a toke or a beer and play then who's to say that's wrong for you.. You decide that..
 
Last edited:
some play like burning hell
That in my experience was the nose candy user. One of my greatest satisfaction in playing for money was breaking even.
Playing Microwave Joe $100 sets with him winning the first and me negotiating the 8 ball to continue. The second went hill hill only because of his stall. I got the set and we were done. He visited the can enough to have put significant money up his nose. Oh well. 🤷‍♂️
 
That in my experience was the nose candy user. One of my greatest satisfaction in playing for money was breaking even.
Playing Microwave Joe $100 sets with him winning the first and me negotiating the 8 ball to continue. The second went hill hill only because of his stall. I got the set and we were done. He visited the can enough to have put significant money up his nose. Oh well. 🤷‍♂️

This was my experience. The guys using nose candy of various types could never hold their mix for a long session. When they started losing they kept adding to their mix. They are already past the point of playing great pool but they can't take away so all they can do is keep adding more.

Just remembered a funny. Late in a session the person I was playing wanted some of what I was using. "No problem, what kind of beer do you drink?"

Hu
 
Back
Top