Jasmin Ouschan on aiming

Bob Jewett

AZB Osmium Member
Staff member
Gold Member
Silver Member
Here's her take on aiming.


My opinion: she should consider fractional aiming more if she plans to teach.
 
I just honestly can't understand how folks have so much trouble with aiming. I'm with her.

You're aiming point is exactly 1 ball width from the center of the OB, in a straight line opposite the direction to where the ball will be pocketed with the center of the CB. You should become very good at estimating this quite quickly if you realize this. Obviously you have to adjust for conditions, CIT and spin and speed. This can be learned at the practice table. Stay down and watch on every shot to learn, and visualize the OB pocketing before you ever pull the trigger. You know how balls roll and how they behave at some point. Visualize it pocketing, if it looks right, it is right.

I know it works for some but all this talk of fractions, centers, edges, etc. is honestly not needed for me at least. Get a good look at the ball and let your subconscious pool computer figure it out. If it looks right it is right. Your body/mind knows. If it feels wrong, it is wrong, listen to that trustworthy feeling you have before a shot. I mean, if it calms a player to imagine fractions or even a blue rhinoceros on the PSR, then whatever works I guess.

It might be different trying to teach beginners but my goodness does a pool player really have to think fractions to see how to make a ball? It seems preposterous to me. I don't mean that disrespectfully. I understand the concept but overlaps and fractions just don't compute for me personally. It seems like extra homework when you already see the shot. Take the time to visualize the ball being made before you hit the CB. This step takes focus but should not be skipped. Practice focus, because it's a major part of playing at a high level.

I understand there are different ways to explain aiming, different students/players think differently, but in the end if the results are the same, the aim was the same no matter what you had to think about or what system to achieve it.

EDIT: I know there are anomalies, but watch the straightest shooting pros. Watch their practice strokes. Watch them feather the stick. If you really dissect the footage, you should even be able to tell their breath work before the final stroke. They are focusing. They are visualizing the ball going into the pocket. If it looks wrong, they get back up, look a bit, throw some chalk on to clear the old "bad feeling" (it looked wrong) and replace it with the proper perspective and visualization. You can definitely tell what the straight shooters are doing. Hell, in HD you might even pick up their pulse in the stick on a touchy situation. Shoot between the heartbeats if you have to. ;)

In the past folks hid all this stuff under the guise of hustling and not to let any secrets out. It's dead simple. If it looks wrong, it is wrong. Visualize the shot with the knowledge you gained at the practice table and execute it. Again, they aren't poking the ball and it's all very deliberate, even down to the breathing. They are consistent because they practice making every shot the same.
 
Last edited:
You're aiming point is exactly 1 ball width from the center of the OB, in a straight line opposite the direction to where the ball will be pocketed with the center of the CB.
1 ball width if you view it from perpendicular to that line. From anywhere else (such as the actual CB position) you have to estimate it from a non-perpendicular angle.

pj
chgo
 
Yeah, she mentions the importance of having references, but then talks about using trial and error, estimating that invisible ghostball, over and over, until you get it working. 🙄

It makes more sense to me (if one is going to rely on the trial-and-error approach) that using consistent visual references (like quarters and eighths of the ob) would be more beneficial than trying to estimate an invisible ghostball position, which is not consistent from shot to shot.

Of course, the ghostball method works, eventually. Many players, myself included, spent years learning that way. But just because it eventually works, and just because countless players of previous decades have learned that way, doesn't mean it's the most efficient or quickest way to develop good aiming skills.
 
....

It might be different trying to teach beginners but my goodness does a pool player really have to think fractions to see how to make a ball? It seems preposterous to me. I don't mean that disrespectfully. I understand the concept but overlaps and fractions just don't compute for me personally. It seems like extra homework when you already see the shot. Take the time to visualize the ball being made before you hit the CB. This step takes focus but should not be skipped. Practice focus, because it's a major part of playing at a high level.

I understand there are different ways to explain aiming, different students/players think differently, but in the end if the results are the same, the aim was the same no matter what you had to think about or what system to achieve it.

...

Answer: No, a "pool player" doesn't need to think fractions in order to see how to pocket a ball.

Fractional aiming simply provides consistent references that beginning and aspiring players can use to help build solid visual aiming skills.

It doesn't take long at all, when using consistent aiming references, to train the mind to simply recognize how to hit a particular shot as soon as you see it, no fractional thinking or calculating involved.

One thing is certain, and this applies to all aiming methods when it comes to learning or developing skills... people are different, and therfore learn in different manners, gravitating toward what feels most useful to them.

I learned via ghostball, but that's because I had zero knowledge of other methods. Looking back, and knowing what I know now about hand-eye skill development, I believe fractional aiming would've been a hell of a lot quicker, involving less trial and error and less table time.
 
Back
Top