I have no idea why his cues bring so little.
There are likely are variety of reasons I would think.
I did mention the simple idea of supply and demand before. I think that's one place to start.
How many cues did George make? 1,000-ish How many cues did Abe make?
Then there is the fact that Abe made mostly merry widows and that many if not most were grossly indistinguishable from the "other" Rich cues.
For fun I just Googled Balabushka merry widow and the first result was an Adam reference, the second was a Meucci, the third was a Rich Q reference! There was Tasc and others, but Abe wasn't on the fist page of results while Rich Q was third. I thought that was interesting.
While George never spliced a cue, I have never seen a George merry widow either. (Of course, I could be ignorant.)
I have sometimes wondered about this. George didn't sign his cues. Maybe he made a merry widow or two. Maybe early on, when he was starting out? Maybe they would be very difficult to identify? The earliest cues of a maker often have little resemblance to their later work when they got their methods down.
So, yeah, there is all that. At the same time I get it, Abe should have drawn more attention and value in the past and today.
I still want an Abe Titlist conversion. I missed one on Ebay a few years back that went for about $200. It still stings.