The basic fractions are the easiest to "see" using CB/OB overlaps - the ones in between are mostly found by "practiced estimation" ("feel").How do the players here that use fractional aiming recognize what fraction the hit is? The basic ones, full, 3/4, 1/2, 1/4,1/8 I can usually see, but its the 3/8 , 5/8 , etc .. those are the ones that give me real trouble.
As Patrick Johnson said, the main fractions are the easiest to "see", or you could say "align". And, while learning to *feel* a little more or less, remember that the eighths are between the others--like, 5/8 is between 6/8 (3/4) and 4/8 (1/2). One reason that you could just go with "feel" is that given the distance one tends to be viewing the target ball, an eighth either way is minor. It's aruguable, but I think all you need to do is put a little focus on hitting to one side or the other of one of the standard fraction alignments, to get the same result as you would with being able to see the eighth difference. (Yes, I know that this differs with the distance the ball travels to the pocket, and also that some will claim to be able to see down to sixteenths, but that's their problem!How do the players here that use fractional aiming recognize what fraction the hit is? The basic ones, full, 3/4, 1/2, 1/4,1/8 I can usually see, but its the 3/8 , 5/8 , etc .. those are the ones that give me real trouble.
Fractional aiming doesn't work for me. I tried deciding on a fractional aim point before my PSR, then aiming at that fraction, but I found I was more accurate aiming by feel. On the other hand, if you use Poolology to calculate the required fractional aim point beforehand, then it's just a matter of hitting the determined fraction, however I found Poolology only works well on certain areas of the table, so I rarely use it anymore. When I first tried Poolology, it seemed like magic, but its shortcomings soon became apparent. Poolology is still pretty interesting, so I try to review it once a year.How do the players here that use fractional aiming recognize what fraction the hit is?
How do the players here that use fractional aiming recognize what fraction the hit is? The basic ones, full, 3/4, 1/2, 1/4,1/8 I can usually see, but its the 3/8 , 5/8 , etc .. those are the ones that give me real trouble.
I don't understand your question. Do you have trouble figuring out which hit to go for, or do you have trouble seeing how to hit the correct fraction of the ball?How do the players here that use fractional aiming recognize what fraction the hit is? The basic ones, full, 3/4, 1/2, 1/4,1/8 I can usually see, but its the 3/8 , 5/8 , etc .. those are the ones that give me real trouble.
Every good boy does fine...Sounds like musical counting. Distinguishing 1, 3, 5, 7, eighths - is only possible out of a context of 8 eighths.
In before an eighth is half a fourth...
Every time I read about fractional aiming, I think back to high school and can still here the collective groans of all those students when fractions were on the curriculum.As Patrick Johnson said, the main fractions are the easiest to "see", or you could say "align". And, while learning to *fee* a little more or less, remember that the eighths are between the others--like, 5/8 is between 6/8 (3/4) and 4/8 (1/2). One reason that you could just go with "feel" is that given the distance one tends to be viewing the target ball, an eighth either way is minor. It's aruguable, but I think all you need to do is put a little focus on hitting to one side or the other of one of the standard fraction alignments, to get the same result as you would with being able to see the eighth difference. (Yes, I know that this differs with the distance the ball travels to the pocket, and also that some will claim to be able to see down to sixteenths, but that's their problem!)
Eighths not really represented, but yet again Dr. Dave has you covered here for fractional aiming.
Every good boy does fine...
There's a FACE in there somewhere.Every good boy does fine...
So in your aiming system, the aim point for all cuts between 30 degrees and 90 degrees is 4mm from the CB center? Why would you think the aim point should be the same for all those cuts?Not sure if your question is one of determining what the cut angle is or where to aim after you have determined the cut angle.
It is possible to estimate the cut angle to within a couple of degrees using stick measurement techniques. Given the cut angle in degrees, the aim point is the same number of mm from the CB center, up to 30 degrees, and 4 mm thereafter.
So in your aiming system, the aim point for all cuts between 30 degrees and 90 degrees is 4mm from the CB center? Why would you think the aim point should be the same for all those cuts?
Yep and this good boy deserved fun!There's a FACE in there somewhere.![]()
_eThere's a FACE in there somewhere.![]()
You do realize the "precision" is in the gradations and not the shooting. (?) Why not EAO for the whole sweep?No, up to 30 degrees the aim point is about one mm off center per degree of cut angle.
So a 10 degree cut aim point is 10 mm off center, 17 degree cut is 17 mm off center.
A 30 degree cut is at 28.56 mm (ball edge, of course), so the approximation starts to show some deviation here.
For 30-50 degrees it is ball edge plus 0.8 mm per degree (sorry, I misspoke above), so a 35 degree cut has the aim point 4mm wide of the ball edge, a 45 degree cut 12mm wide of the ball edge.
Beyond 50 degrees I lose my visualization and use equal-opposite aiming.
It could be because I don't know what EAO meansYou do realize the "precision" is in the gradations and not the shooting. (?) Why not EAO for the whole sweep?