Intentional Fouls - Illegal, Good Strategy, or Poor Sportsmanship?

no, player calls it a good shot and wins the game.

or its a cue ball foul and ball gets back where it was.

or as bob said.
 
I hate that 8 ball doesn't have a 3 foul rule.

It would be too punitive for 8 ball since you are shooting at different object balls than your opponent. Three foul in 8 ball would really only benefit people who are way behind their opponent, and even then it might waste more time trying to play multiple safeties in a row instead of running out.
 
You are playing 9-ball and find yourself in a situation where if you make a mistake, you will leave an easy runout.

The lowest ball on the table is the 5, but you are hooked, so you intentionally foul by nudging the 6-ball behind the 7-ball into a position that forces him to have to play a safe because he now can't run the table.

Is that considered a foul or loss of game?

I know how we played these situations in gambling games years ago, but I am trying to see how people do things now.
It’s a simple ball in hand foul on any league or tournament I’ve ever played. I’ve seen it many many many times. It’s not that unusual
 
The BCA tried that for a year or two as an optional rule. The obvious problem is when you run all but one ball. If your opponent can play a little safety, you will lose on three fouls.
Then they need to plan better. Its that exact situation that irks me and then the opponent starts knocking your balls in.
 
The BCA tried that for a year or two as an optional rule. The obvious problem is when you run all but one ball. If your opponent can play a little safety, you will lose on three fouls.
Well that triggers my 3 foul story. Shirley I have told it here previously. It is how I won my first $5 eight ball tournament via the 3 foul rule.
Rhinestone Ray was the top gun in the Tacoma tavern. The tournament director confirmed BCA rules at start. Ray was facing a simple kick after the first 2 fouls and verbal warning. He was surprised at the rule but scoffed at the attempt to hide him again. He brashly offered a hundred dollar bet that he would hit it this time. After I declined the offer he proceeded to hit the one rail kick to the 8 ball but went in off with whitey. 🤷‍♂️ Musta' been a little Karma. 🤷‍♂️ 😉
 
Scenario:

You are playing last-pocket 8-ball and your opponent has made all of his balls and shot the 8-ball without making it, but left it very close to his last pocket.

You come to the table and do whatever you can do and find yourself in a situation where if you screw up, you will leave him a good shot on the 8-ball and lose the game.

Some of your balls are kind of clustered in one part of the table and you decide to intentionally shoot his 8-ball so that it is now behind your cluster preventing him from having a makeable shot on the 8-ball into his pocket even though he has ball in hand.

Is this legal, good strategy, or poor sportsmanship?
You posed 3 questions so here’s my take……..rather sweet and simple…….but not all of us think alike nowadays.

It is legal……a potentially winning strategy…….sportsmanship is about one’s behavior, not their strategy to try winning.

If you don’t always try your very best, you neither have the heart, drive nor passion to become and remain a champion.
 
You posed 3 questions so here’s my take……..rather sweet and simple…….but not all of us think alike nowadays.

It is legal……a potentially winning strategy…….sportsmanship is about one’s behavior, not their strategy to try winning.

If you don’t always try your very best, you neither have the heart, drive nor passion to become and remain a champion.
So, you would have no problem with an opponent using that tactic on you?
 
Scenario:

You are playing last-pocket 8-ball and your opponent has made all of his balls and shot the 8-ball without making it, but left it very close to his last pocket.

You come to the table and do whatever you can do and find yourself in a situation where if you screw up, you will leave him a good shot on the 8-ball and lose the game.

Some of your balls are kind of clustered in one part of the table and you decide to intentionally shoot his 8-ball so that it is now behind your cluster preventing him from having a makeable shot on the 8-ball into his pocket even though he has ball in hand.

Is this legal, good strategy, or poor sportsmanship?
The game has already succumbed to jump sticks and as a result, the kicking component will become progressively weaker.
I personally don't want the defensive game to weaken. I believe the APA rules (for one) don't even allow for a "3-foul rule."

Our game seems to be tilting back toward rotation games like 9-ball (a la the WNT) and is becoming more of a "shooter's game." We're seeing new players coming up who can shoot laser-straight, but are not learning the nuances.

I refuse to allow our game to lose it's most strategic tool: playing defense regardless of the context.
Personally, I wish there were more one-pocket and straight pool tournaments.
So sure, it may seem like "dirty" pool but defense is part and parcel of our ever-evolving game.
 
Well that triggers my 3 foul story. Shirley I have told it here previously. It is how I won my first $5 eight ball tournament via the 3 foul rule.
Rhinestone Ray was the top gun in the Tacoma tavern. The tournament director confirmed BCA rules at start. Ray was facing a simple kick after the first 2 fouls and verbal warning. He was surprised at the rule but scoffed at the attempt to hide him again. He brashly offered a hundred dollar bet that he would hit it this time. After I declined the offer he proceeded to hit the one rail kick to the 8 ball but went in off with whitey. 🤷‍♂️ Musta' been a little Karma. 🤷‍♂️ 😉
He lost the game, but technically would have won the bet since he hit the ball.
 
Yup.
And play rotation with all 15 balls too!
That's the game that Efren mastered first. Then 3 cushion billiards THEN 9 ball.
The money game in the Philippines was rotation. He dominated and couldn't get played so took to billiards to get action. When he brought those skills to the US 9 ball tournament......well in Reno the only bet available was how many games his opponent could get in the race to 9. 🤷‍♂️
I had the pleasure of watching his first year in the USA at the Reno Sands 9 ball. His immaculate control of the cueball was The best on the 9 ball circuit. In the finals he opened by running 4 racks then put Earl in handcuffs. With ball in hand he added 3 more and put Earl back in jail again! His second trip to the table and hooked well buried Again. GOING TO 9 and down 7-0 Kinda got some Vintage Earl whiney utterances. The gallery responce of "break it! Break Your Cue". became the chant. 🤷‍♂️
 
He lost the game, but technically would have won the bet since he hit the ball.
He had broke and run to the 8 ball narrowly missed the 8 but left it close to the corner (that he later scratched in). I had 7 balls with 3 messed up and needed to be relocated. I took care of 2 and hooked him on my first shot. An obvious safety. SOOOO,he just picks up and hands me the cue ball with a sneer. My second shot based on that response was to move a ball to adjacent another in case he handed it to me again. He did. 🤷‍♂️ I called the tournament director to confirm the rules and then notified him that he was on 2 and 3 is loss of game. The blockade I created was good but not great. There was a multiple rail path which he and I knew. He wasn't new. 🤷‍♂️ I was new but had been to school. 🤷‍♂️
 
I think bank 8 or last pocket 8 ball games alter the flow of the game (compared to normal 8 ball rules) with an attempt to balance out mismatched players. I would rather play an adjusted race with normal 8 ball rules.
 
So, you would have no problem with an opponent using that tactic on you?
Nope……I’d do it to him……in a friendly game for shits n’ giggles, I wouldn’t do that. No reason or incentive to do it.
Yet when the game matters, absolutely, I play to win, not to get compliments from my opponent it was a good game.
If you weren’t allowed to use that shot when it was critically needed, the rules would prohibit doing it but not the case.

But…….like Ralph Greenleaf supposedly replied to Willie Moscini over dinner one night about having the killer instinct,
when you shove a knife in your opponent’s heart, be sure you twist the blade. When the win matters, only the outcome
counts. There’s no sportsmanship points awarded for losing the gold medal or rationalizing that you really won the silver.
 
Nope……I’d do it to him……in a friendly game for shits n’ giggles, I wouldn’t do that. No reason or incentive to do it.
Yet when the game matters, absolutely, I play to win, not to get compliments from my opponent it was a good game.
If you weren’t allowed to use that shot when it was critically needed, the rules would prohibit doing it but not the case.

But…….like Ralph Greenleaf supposedly replied to Willie Moscini over dinner one night about having the killer instinct,
when you shove a knife in your opponent’s heart, be sure you twist the blade. When the win matters, only the outcome
counts. There’s no sportsmanship points awarded for losing the gold medal or rationalizing that you really won the silver.
Good answer.
 
I think bank 8 or last pocket 8 ball games alter the flow of the game (compared to normal 8 ball rules) with an attempt to balance out mismatched players. I would rather play an adjusted race with normal 8 ball rules.
Bank the 8 or last pocket 8 ball were played at The Senior Center. Oh yeah and golf on the Snooker table. 🤷‍♂️
 
Back
Top