Yeah, I'm not Tiger...Tiger was the best in the world. At his prime, no one could beat him consistently, including his well-paid coach.

Yeah, I'm not Tiger...Tiger was the best in the world. At his prime, no one could beat him consistently, including his well-paid coach.
I think this is a good point and can separate instructors. What can an instructor do with YOU after seeing YOU by working with YOU directly. Playing ability is not the main thing as I think we mostly agree. A non world champion may see and fix things the world champ doesn’t. Hard to know without working with them for enough time to form an opinion. And making instructional/informative videos is different from coaching an individual on what they need (which changes with improvement etc…)you're picking two of the best pro player instructors there, but not all pro players that sell instruction hours are as good, or good at all..
i didn't know dr dave was a pool instructor at all tbh. i thought he was a youtuber breaking down pool shots into physical theory, mostly? he's very good at that. i think we're lucky to have guys like dave and bob in pool, and on azb
I'm sorry but that is just wrong. There are no mid tier players who will beat SVB or Gorst through a bit of instruction. It's a patently ridiculous thought.Name a mid tier level player and I believe Dr Dave can take the guy over the hump and beat a SVB or Gorst.
He may not be able to play according to you but I believe he can coach someone to victory.
Not a chance.Name a mid tier level player and I believe Dr Dave can take the guy over the hump and beat a SVB or Gorst.
He may not be able to play according to you but I believe he can coach someone to victory.
The golf influencers do that kind of stuff all the time. It’s pretty entertaining.I can envision an instructors tournament. Call it the Briesath Cup. Invitations only.
Dr. Dave, Fran, Billiards about and Ron the Pool Student vs. Sharivari, Barry Stark, Barton Snooker and the Pool School guy.Bob can officiate. Open for suggestions.
Kidding of course, but this idea isn’t totally ridiculous I suppose.
I am not judging or critiquing Dr. Dave’s teaching here (I’ve never had a lesson from him or seen him teach in person- I have read his posts and seen videos like most everyone here) or any other instructor… Here is where I think things can break down between good or great instructors and where playing ability AND teaching experience come in. Discussion of Tiger fits in here too and the differences between a Butch Harmon and others (Sean Foley maybe???) teaching excellent to great players comes in. When you say mid tier do you mean Hennessy, Eberle etc… or a 650. Having a 750-800 come to a teacher to see if he can run in the top 20 in the world is a different deal than working with a 600 FR. If the instructor has a cookie cutter approach he could make the player worse. Can the instructor see subtle technique issues and then have the wisdom and experience to separate out what needs to change and what might be better left alone. Then can he see areas of the player’s game that could improve and be able to teach well enough to fix it. Here is where playing ability can come in, but also teaching ability and experience. Needless to say, there aren’t as many teachers who a very good player should go to as compared to lower level players. Also depends some on what the player is looking for. IMO. And of course im not in the group trying to get over the hump to beat SVB or Gorst.Name a mid tier level player and I believe Dr Dave can take the guy over the hump and beat a SVB or Gorst.
He may not be able to play according to you but I believe he can coach someone to victory.
This is what this thread was supposed to be about, it's now gone WAY off the rails from its original intent.The point of an Instructors Match would be to see, under game conditions, how THEY try to apply the techniques they're telling us to apply. I suspect I'd learn something from that. Sure, it would be entertaining, because many of us average players appreciate and admire these guys, but it's not about judging how strong a player anyone is.
I watch pool/snooker games online, the best players in the world. I try to learn from them, they are in front of the camera, i turn on my powers of observation and try to see how they play.The point of an Instructors Match would be to see, under game conditions, how THEY try to apply the techniques they're telling us to apply. I suspect I'd learn something from that. Sure, it would be entertaining, because many of us average players appreciate and admire these guys, but it's not about judging how strong a player anyone is.
Yes, it would.I was talking with a friend today about the great instructional videos presented by Dr. Dave. He asked me if I've ever seen him play and I had to say no I haven't.
I'd love to seem him square off with Bob J sometime in a game of straight pool. Would that be fun to see!
Dave is definitely a solid player. When I asked him in a thread a few years ago what his estimated fargo rate would be- he said around what you said, maybe a bit higher.Dr Dave can play some. I thought he was more C speed 15 years ago. He convinced me otherwise when he participated in the AZB Ghost Challenge for two years in 2015 and 2017 and put up some very high scores. He won 7-1 on the 9 ball ghost on an 8' table, and 7-2 on the 10 ball ghost on a 9' table. These were his best scores, but you have to be able to play a bit to do this. I'd put his FargoRate at about 630 based on these scores and watching him play. Certainly not pro level, but a good local speed.
Do you think any player would improve that much without knowing at least some of what an instructor teaches?No instructor on the planet is taking any level player to Shane level. Where do people come up with this crap?
I was talking with a friend today about the great instructional videos presented by Dr. Dave. He asked me if I've ever seen him play and I had to say no I haven't.
I'd love to seem him square off with Bob J sometime in a game of straight pool. Would that be fun to see!