Search results

Says 7% he wins 2-1 and 5% 2-0. F it, 12% is still huge underdog. I’ll take 9:1 odds.

So you’re saying Donny has 6% chance to win? Someone lay me 10:1 and I’ll try a buck or two on the big guy.

So if someone breaks and runs a 3 pack in a race to 3 against a 800, they played 800 speed? And if they break and run against a 733, they played 733 speed?

I’m a 482 and I normally lose to the 9 ball ghost on a 9’ diamond in a race to 7. I’ve won but it’s rare. I normally get to 3 or 4. On a diamond bar table I’m probably about 50% to beat the ghost. Both just depend on the day.

When you start with ball in hand, it’s different than playing someone

You’re so bitter lol

“Relatively” hahaha he’s done pretty well with “thinking” games in the past few years of plying them. No, he’s not an elite 1pocket player... who cares. But he can hold his own in any game. Calling him one dimensional is silly. How many straight in shots did he have when he beat you at Derby...

Ummm ok 1st place: 2018 DCC 14.1 challenge 2nd place: 2018 8ball classic 3rd place: 2018 DCC banks 12th place: 2018 DCC 1pocket 1st place: 2017 accustats 14.1 make it happen 1st place: 2017 accustats 8 ball make it happen 2nd place: 2018 carom room 1 pocket 3rd place: 2017 china world...

The people who play this game are it’s own worst enemy.

Let’s make chalk and tips illegal!

By shooting one handed, jacked up. He pocketed the ball and cueball ended up on the short rail leaving him a back cut. He missed it. Again, it’s one handed. It happens.

This is the match in question. That's Justin Cone aka Roadman. He made the 7 and got funny on the 9. From what I saw of this match, it was on the up and up.

Absolutely. I can’t understand why the match results wouldn’t be shared. I think it would only be a selling point to the people that question the system. While you’re at it, a users ability to filter the data too. For instance, to be able to look up a player and filter results when playing...

Carl is extremely well off. I highly doubt he was dumping or stalling. He bets high but he’s not a good player.

As I figured. So adding 1-0 isn’t moving the needle for anyone

Out of curiosity, if I played Shaw and lost 8-9 in a tournament would it reflect on my rating the same way as losing 0-1?

Which is sort of the problem, at least for certain parts of the country. I've played in many tournaments in New York and New Jersey. None of them are reported to Fargo. My robustness comes from just a few things. Like when I jokingly played in the US Open 10 ball, got wasted and didn't make a...

I’m probably close to 100 points too low. Maybe 70-80 to be conservative. But definitely not right. When I put in my Fargo with people I play even against to find the right game, it’s a lock game for me. I don’t mind :) I’m not saying I’m good but 484 isn’t right.

Skyline has always been one of my favorite rooms. Good food, good people and always good action.

My table at home is tough and slow... and has rolls and one of the pockets is nightmare tough lol. BUT I'll still try it, again. I'd just like to see how I've improved since last time. If I really cared about a high score, I'd go to a pool hall with buckets and I'd probably increase my score a lot.