In that case, tell Oscar for me that I have no Fargo. Should help out my handicap in the Mezz events.
Oh but you're so close (190 games). And your performance is running 60+ points high to get that 6-designation ;-)
In that case, tell Oscar for me that I have no Fargo. Should help out my handicap in the Mezz events.
So, I take it you're Joey Gray?
When a player has zero games in the system and they play in an event that gets reported how long does it take for that data to show up?
People are funny when it comes to their ratings. It seems that many people think they are as good as their best matches. In my area (Arizona), Fargo is practically a religion! Every tournament is based on Fargo. Handicapped using their charts and capped at various ratings (550 and below, 600 and under, etc.). The funny thing is that almost everyone I have talked to about ratings has either implied or flat out stated that their rating is low. Some people with over 2,000 robustness, plays three tournaments per week, and still laughs that their Fargo is about 75 points lower than it should be! One guy rated at about 620 gets a couple of beers in him and says stuff like “don’t tell on me, but I should be about a 680.” Then you see him on the stream table dogging his brains out. But the best is when someone around 525 says stuff like, I actually play at about 537 speed. Is there a noticeable difference??
Why do people feel a need to let other people know they think they’re underrated. Self conscious maybe?
I’m probably close to 100 points too low. Maybe 70-80 to be conservative. But definitely not right. When I put in my Fargo with people I play even against to find the right game, it’s a lock game for me. I don’t mind
I’m not saying I’m good but 484 isn’t right.
539 with 197 Robustness but have won against 630 and 622 and Hill/Hill against 712. Just don't play enough to become consistent.
I asked if I could have a FargoRate that matched my IQ........
....Mike said he didn't deal in single figures.....
You don’t really even have a rating yet, you’re robustness is way too low.
People are funny when it comes to their ratings. It seems that many people think they are as good as their best matches. In my area (Arizona), Fargo is practically a religion! Every tournament is based on Fargo. Handicapped using their charts and capped at various ratings (550 and below, 600 and under, etc.). The funny thing is that almost everyone I have talked to about ratings has either implied or flat out stated that their rating is low. Some people with over 2,000 robustness, plays three tournaments per week, and still laughs that their Fargo is about 75 points lower than it should be! One guy rated at about 620 gets a couple of beers in him and says stuff like “don’t tell on me, but I should be about a 680.” Then you see him on the stream table dogging his brains out. But the best is when someone around 525 says stuff like, I actually play at about 537 speed. Is there a noticeable difference??
Why do people feel a need to let other people know they think they’re underrated. Self conscious maybe?
Are the derby city matches turned in?
Scores are not reported or recorded there. Such a wasted opportunity... DCC doesn't seem to have updated any of their systems in at least 8 years.