Search results

  1. Patrick Johnson

    One Pocket Break

    Somebody asked about the one pocket break recently, which got me tinkering with VP4 (ruh roh). Hope this is helpful. pj chgo Typical one pocket break - good result
  2. Patrick Johnson

    Funny pic/gif thread...

  3. Patrick Johnson

    Lowest deflection kielwood

    Oh, I see what you mean now - shoulda known. Thanks. pj chgo
  4. Patrick Johnson

    Lowest deflection kielwood

    I'm guessing by "torque" you mean the force of the cue's impact? Sure, different cues deliver slightly different amounts of force for the same stroke, due to weight (not deflection). The difference is compensated with slightly different stroke force. pj chgo
  5. Patrick Johnson

    Lowest deflection kielwood

    Right. Deflection isn't a factor. pj chgo
  6. Patrick Johnson

    Deflection question, explain how a stiffer CF shaft has less deflection.

    That was the question, alright - and the answer I expected. Thanks. And does that mean the CF shaft will squirt more than an equal-mass maple shaft (because more of the shaft is "involved" as end mass)? pj chgo
  7. Patrick Johnson

    Filipino "ref" chalk marking on cloth - has it ever helped?

    I've never seen it come into play - but I assume it must or they wouldn't do it so much... pj chgo
  8. Patrick Johnson

    Filipino "ref" chalk marking on cloth - has it ever helped?

    Yeah, bored enough to complain about somebody else's innocent, pool-related interest is plenty. Maybe try smoking a doob before logging on...? pj chgo
  9. Patrick Johnson

    Lowest deflection kielwood

    Deflection is important for aiming - not for swerve/masse. You're entitled to your beliefs, but I don't think the two have anything to do with each other. Deflection only affects the immediate initial direction of the CB, which is more accurately controlled by simply aiming. pj chgo
  10. Patrick Johnson

    Lowest deflection kielwood

    For the weight, as Gustav said. Large diameter tips are just what comes with that. pj chgo
  11. Patrick Johnson

    Lowest deflection kielwood

    A little greater mass = a little less acceleration. OK, that's a small possible advantage (if your stroke is sensitive to it). So how does more deflection help? pj chgo
  12. Patrick Johnson

    Lowest deflection kielwood

    So, slightly less speed (like any shot with a heavier cue) and slightly different aim. Doesn’t sound like enough of a difference to make the shot noticeably “easier”. And I’ve jumped many times with only a shaft - seems easier, not harder (that’s why we used to do it) - didn’t notice it...
  13. Patrick Johnson

    Lowest deflection kielwood

    Now you’re deflecting… You’re saying the extra deflection itself is the “work” that’s needed? How does greater deflection help with masse? pj chgo
  14. Patrick Johnson

    Lowest deflection kielwood

    What “work” does high deflection do for swerve/masse? What extra “effort” is needed without it? pj chgo
  15. Patrick Johnson

    Deflection question, explain how a stiffer CF shaft has less deflection.

    It occurs to me that the transverse wave speed (?), which I believe determines the amount of a shaft’s length that counts as end mass, might be significantly different in CF vs. maple. Anybody got an idea? Dave? Bob? Mike? Fred? Ron? Bueller? pj <- infocoholic chgo
  16. Patrick Johnson

    Aim Visualization Techniques

    I'm thinking the "sections" are the overlapped edges, "cut" at the contact point between them? (y) pj chgo
  17. Patrick Johnson

    Spin-to-Speed or Revolutions-per-Foot?

    There once was a product like that - a longish triangular mirror that sat under the rail. Only for practice, of course... pj chgo
  18. Patrick Johnson

    Deflection question, explain how a stiffer CF shaft has less deflection.

    For reference, here's a diagram of two 12mm shafts, CF and solid maple, showing how thick the CF walls need to be in order for the shafts to have equal mass (assumes CF's density is 2.5 times maple's). Presumably, these would produce equal deflection. If the maple shaft was hollow at the tip...
  19. Patrick Johnson

    Spin-to-Speed or Revolutions-per-Foot?

    Everyone? pj chgo
  20. Patrick Johnson

    Spin-to-Speed or Revolutions-per-Foot?

    The poolmudgeons can’t seem to tell when they’re playing pool vs. talking on the internet. pj chgo
Back
Top