No offense sir but i would have zero interest in watching what you so accurately call a "gaff" game. Would you want to watch Tiger give some hack a crapload of strokes for a pile of $$? I'd rather mow the yard.it would have to be very big
18 to 2,,a handspan
would you guys watch a gaff game like that on pay per
or do you prefer to see the same great players bump heads with other peoples money
I haven't played in months,I never played this high quality of player
I want to play
Dean has stated in the past that he wouldn't consider a long set.
I seriously doubt anyone is going to give him a sack of balls for a couple games worth.
They might at 1-5 thousand a game.....
it would have to be very big
18 to 2,,a handspan
would you guys watch a gaff game like that on pay per
or do you prefer to see the same great players bump heads with other peoples money
I haven't played in months,I never played this high quality of player
I want to play
For a max of 2-5 games? I don't think so.
MAYBE, if they happened to be in the same place/ same time with some time to kill...
No offense sir but i would have zero interest in watching what you so accurately call a "gaff" game. Would you want to watch Tiger give some hack a crapload of strokes for a pile of $$? I'd rather mow the yard.
You don’t think Roberto wouldn’t want a 2-10 thousand payday for just a few games ?
He just played 3 DAYS for 5k
I don't. The risk to the better player is too high for just a couple games, if giving up massive spot.
As the length increases, the risk of the spotted player pooping out decreases
On that giant pocket Centennial? I think Dean would have the advantage.
In my experience, the large pockets favor the player GIVING the weight.[/QU
You are absolutely correct.
Jack