What are the explainable and simple valid reasons why a 60 year old pro pool player in good health and still good vision, with 45 years of playing experience, doesn't figure in the long run to be able to beat a 30 year old pro player with 15 years playing experience - 1/3 of the playing time? This pertains specifically to a game like 9-ball or 14.1, and not so much 1-pocket. One would think the 30 years more of playing experience would give the older pro the advantage, but that's obviously not the case.
When compared to a sport like golf, it's obvious the physical requirements and flexibility necessary for swinging a golf club, playing 18 holes of golf a day in addition to hitting 300-400 balls on the range every day, it's easy to understand why a 60 year old pro golfer can't compete with a pro half his age. A better comparison in golf would be why a 60 year old pro golfer couldn't likely beat a 30 year old pro golfer in a putting contest - which requires similar fine touch/feel skills as pool, but nothing physically demanding.that would clearly give the younger player the clear advantage? I can only come up with two possible explanations.
First, although one's vision can still be very good and sharp into your 60s and even your 70s, I believe (at least in my case) your depth perception / 3D perception has certainly diminished some by this age - making it harder to determine exactly how far an object ball is resting off a rail for any cut shot particularly a longer shot, which your brain subconsciously needs to accurately calculate when you are over the ball preparing to shoot.
Secondly, it's hard to explain, but as you age, one's fine twitch muscle coordination just seems to make it harder and less automatic at times to be able to execute a very smooth straight back and straight through stroke - even when you know with absolute certainty you are lined up properly to pocket the ball. I don't know the exact physiological explanation for this, but I assume it's the same reasons why senior pro golfers are far more likely to miss a 2-4 foot straight in putt than a pro golfer half his age.
Obviously those responding to this thread from experience are those like myself that are old enough to being going through it and trying to overcome it, but anyone is welcome to try their best to explain their reasoning. - thanks
When compared to a sport like golf, it's obvious the physical requirements and flexibility necessary for swinging a golf club, playing 18 holes of golf a day in addition to hitting 300-400 balls on the range every day, it's easy to understand why a 60 year old pro golfer can't compete with a pro half his age. A better comparison in golf would be why a 60 year old pro golfer couldn't likely beat a 30 year old pro golfer in a putting contest - which requires similar fine touch/feel skills as pool, but nothing physically demanding.that would clearly give the younger player the clear advantage? I can only come up with two possible explanations.
First, although one's vision can still be very good and sharp into your 60s and even your 70s, I believe (at least in my case) your depth perception / 3D perception has certainly diminished some by this age - making it harder to determine exactly how far an object ball is resting off a rail for any cut shot particularly a longer shot, which your brain subconsciously needs to accurately calculate when you are over the ball preparing to shoot.
Secondly, it's hard to explain, but as you age, one's fine twitch muscle coordination just seems to make it harder and less automatic at times to be able to execute a very smooth straight back and straight through stroke - even when you know with absolute certainty you are lined up properly to pocket the ball. I don't know the exact physiological explanation for this, but I assume it's the same reasons why senior pro golfers are far more likely to miss a 2-4 foot straight in putt than a pro golfer half his age.
Obviously those responding to this thread from experience are those like myself that are old enough to being going through it and trying to overcome it, but anyone is welcome to try their best to explain their reasoning. - thanks
Last edited: