The responses to this poll have hovered around 50/50 but I'm curious about the mindset of those who voted against using an instructor who is "Unable to teach what they cannot do themselves".
I sense that many if not most were viewing this question from a purely physical aspect of performance. The notion , for example, is that if the instructor cannot draw the ball the full length of the table, then how can they teach me to do it. (As if physical success in one area defines overall ability).
I know of one pro who could draw the cue ball two lengths of the table and yet I can think of several other pros, who play at a much higher and more consistent level, despite the fact that they lack the ability to draw two lengths of the table.
Focusing on this physical approach may seems plausible on the surface but I think it misses the big picture.
Most advanced players reach a point where they recognize that this game is 90% mental. Performance has much more to do with what's going on in your head as you sight the shot and physically execute the stroke....not simply the principles of physical execution.
So, if the game is 90% mental, why do so many focus only on the physical aspects when choosing an instructor?
Wouldn't it make more sense to base your criteria on instructors who understand the 90% more so than just using the 10% that encompasses physicality as your basis in choosing an instructor?
Einstein couldn't travel at the speed of light but he was one of the few who understood it's implications.
Imagine how little we would understand about the universe today had we required him to physically prove his point.
I can't agree with this as I see your example as totally invalid - apples to oranges. Reason being is this : While we know that no human could possibly travel at the speed of light we also know that instructors CAN AND DO have the ability to play at a very strong speed.
'Naivete' and age, may not have that much to do with things..There are 'PBIA Master Instructors', (who I'm sure are older gentlemen)..yet they seem to operate with a
very closed mind on this subject!
SJD, Of course all of the instructors have a closed mind on this subject. They have to lol! They all take the same position and that's because it's totally self-serving. Honestly I can't really say that I blame them though, it is their livelyhood and basically they are promoting their businesses. It's kinda like a winner down salesman going around telling people " look, there are plenty of other things you can spend that $30,000 on because the windows you have work just fine ". You could say that in most fields. Some might say what the instructors push is lies or at least dishonest to a degree but once again I can say they are just promoting their business.
Obviously there are folks on both sides of the fence on this one. I happen to agree with you for the most part. You are a couple generations ahead of me but we both saw the same things. I can't say I ever remember seeing any of the top players taking " lessons " when coming up. I wrote " lessons " this way because the word lesson is often used by instructors to help their narrative. If you were to just use a strict definition of the word then yes, all of us ( pool players ) at some point had someone show us something to help improve our game or someone " taught " us a thing or two along the way.
The way it always worked and I'd assume still does for the most part is is you were lucky enough to get a top player to take a liking to you they would " take you in under their wing ", some may call it mentoring , and they would " show you what ya needed to know. There really was none of this pay me $150 for a four hour lesson ( or whatever the price / time frame may be ), and then OK you've completed your first lesson - let's schedule the other 25 lessons or whatever. There was no do this drill a million times, do that drill 949,000 times, it was you got your action lined up and got up and played. If you and or your mentor noticed you were having problem with a specific shot then sure - you practiced it some till you were more comfortable with it.
Now as I've always said, I do believe instructors are a good thing and definitely have their place in pool. What that place is IMHO is where I differ from them. I think it's great for an instructor to to show a newbie or rookie the basics and if the new player doesn't necessarily have a " natural " talent then give them the basics and headed in the right direction. I'll even say folks that aren't a total novice can benefit from instruction. Once someone has learned the basics they will definitely need the table time and the experience from being in action ( more on this in a moment lol ) and at this point if they can not get it from one of their peers it would be a great time to start learning strategy from an instructor. After these stages though, I believe the best ( not necessarily the only ) way to get better is from just getting up and playing.
Now for the record, from this point on I will reference " getting in action ". I am fully aware for a multitude of reasons that every single person wanting to play pool and get good at it either can not or will not be able to gamble. With that in imd, I will include playing in tournaments as " getting in action ". It two fold - #1 that they are actually getting up and playing and putting in work and #2 ( which I consider critical and the most important part of playing with the pressure. Pressure as in whatever game they are playing actually means " something ", as opposed to beating balls around on a table when in essence even if you are totally focused and committedit really doesn't matter if you hang a 9 ball up in the jaws. It really doesn't matter if you run a 10 pack. You will neither win nor lose anything ( could be money or it could be advancing to the next round in a tournament ) but I'm sure you get the point. The old saying that goes something like this is what I am trying to convey what my belief is : fire makes gold ad pressure makes diamonds basically ( hope I didn't screw that one up too ad lol.
I know there are many folks that totally disagree with me on all of this and that's fine but I believe I have history on my side. What I mean is just look at all the truly GREAT players throughout history that never took " lessons ". And how many of those great players do you think cut their teeth you getting up, posting up, and then counting up the cheez! They hung around the pool rooms, they played, they learned. Got in action, went on the road, snapped off tournaments etc. One thing I do know with absolute certainty is IF ALL THINGS were able to be truly 100% totally even, if I were gonna have to bet my life on a match between a strictly tournament player up against an action player I'm taking the action player EVERY TIME. For anyone that has a problem with that viewpoint or statement just take a look at all of the great players ( both current and those throughout history ) what do 99% of them all have I common?????