He certainly does, but it's harder when you have to actually make the other player foul, and he doesn't care if he sells out as long as he makes a good hit.
Alex needed snookers by the time all the reds were gone, and he did seem to try for them on the green and brown (several innings passed while they were on each of these balls). By the time Wild made the brown it was pretty well over.
-Andrew
Are you watching this? is it being broadcast anywhere?
No, I'm doing the math to figure out what ball they're on. The live score includes "points remaining" which is enough to know which balls are left on the table.
-Andrew
ALEX!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
:happydance:
One more for the ticket
The game isn't over until the first score on the black, as there is theoretically no limit to the number of points you can claw back from snookers, but you need at least two object balls on the table obviously. Due to television it's now customary for a player to concede if snookers are required, but not mandatory, and it's entirely up to the player. But if it's the last frame and you both need to win then why not go for as many snookers as you need?Can anyone explain how it's 71 to 47, with "13 points left", and they are still playing?
Pool should flat out copy EVERYTHING about how snooker is run.
At this point, does he have to qualify for haters to eat their words?
Freddie
It will be a dream come true for Barry Hearn if he does. He tried to get the USA interested in snooker decades ago. Look at all the interest here in an untelevised amateur competition:If he beats Liam Highfield that will speak for itself.
Freddie,
Common sense doesn't make any of us haters. I know your technical so we will boil it down to a math & time problem.
AC (Alex's Chances) = (RA (Raw Ability) x Expericance x Heart x Snooker Knowledge x SM (Stroke Mechanics)) / (Age/30)
Where Alex has a lot of the required attributes...he is OVER 35! In a simple statement. Too old to start now. Yes he's got some experience with Snooker but beating up on a bunch of locals whose best before date was when Nixon was in office is not that big a deal. The Canadian championship now is largely a local thing where almost none of the rest of Canada even participate in. Snooker in Canada is in the great decline. In the 70's or 80's if you won you were probably TOP 20 in the world or better. Today not so much.
Data Point Number 2:
Stephen Hendry is still considered the best tournament player EVER.
Turned Pro at 17
First World Championship - 1991, Age 21
Last World Championship - 1999, Age 30 (7 in total)
Never won a Major after that. Last tourny win 2005 (Malta age 36)
Alex will be 36 next month. Age is not just a number. It's math.
I wish Alex much success but he should have come to the UK two decades ago.
Nick