I often have a tendency to put a slight amount of left hand English on this shot and that is when I sell out the cue ball. You have to practice hitting VERY low draw and just catching the edge of the 11 ball. It is extreme, smooth, low draw that makes this shot a winner.
JoeyA (Not really a big dog. More like a medium size Irish Setter).
Eureka! That's the coaching I needed, Joey - thanks. With left spin I wasn't getting low enough. With just extreme low centerball, the draw works much better, sometimes missing the long rail entirely, like this:
I must have misplaced your number. Call me today if you want to come by my house later (gotta Diamond here now). I'll PM you the number in case you don't have it.
Here's another shot (which is a little misleading as far as what type of English and where you need to aim at the object ball) that Peer recorded on video from the infamous Chris Capp who I have heard will be matching up with Kimbo Slice soon.
Here's another shot (which is a little misleading as far as what type of English and where you need to aim at the object ball) that Peer recorded on video from the infamous Chris Capp who I have heard will be matching up with Kimbo Slice soon.
With a little practice, this shot can be added to your arsenal. It is not as hard as it looks. The only difficulty is having the confidence that you can sharply draw the cue ball into the head rail and float the cue ball down behind the two other balls thereby protecting the 11 ball if you fail to make it.
i actually tried it like this today..i never made the shot but i got the ball down there and whitey in behind those two balls....the other way,shooting to two railer and sending whitey back and forth..i scratched a few times in the oppenents pocket...
well..i guess what im saying if i was going to shoot one of those shots it wouldnt be the two railer....the other one is a little easier to control whitey...
I agree with the thought process as long as I'm playing a guy who can't play dead.
IMO, one pocket played at a high level does not involve waiting for your opponent to leave you straight in, but rather maneuvering the balls to force him to try to get out of the trap.
The shot choice you explained leans more the direction of the waiting game and not the trapping game.
With Joey's coaching (hit it low with no sidespin) even I could get the cueball to do that, without even hitting the long rail. And that was on slippery cloth - I bet on sticky cloth you could hit the other OBs without hitting the long rail.
Try it; you'll be surprised (if you can hit the CB pretty low and pretty hard).
The main challenge is hitting the CB hard enough to get it all the way downtable. All the CB's forward momentum is killed with draw, so you have to convert the thin carom off the 11 to sideways momentum (kicking off the head rail).
With Joey's coaching (hit it low with no sidespin) even I could get the cueball to do that, without even hitting the long rail. And that was on slippery cloth - I bet on sticky cloth you could hit the other OBs without hitting the long rail.
Try it; you'll be surprised (if you can hit the CB pretty low and pretty hard).
The main challenge is hitting the CB hard enough to get it all the way downtable. All the CB's forward momentum is killed with draw, so you have to convert the thin carom off the 11 to sideways momentum (kicking off the head rail).
The funny thing about all of these "phenomenal" shots is that once you know how they are done, anyone can do them. Cliff didn't tell me what he was doing and it took time to discover the shot's secret.
I love to watch magic tricks and I don't have to know how they're done to enjoy them but with magic tricks I want to be entertained only. With pool, I like being entertained but I also like to perform and the only way to perform is to learn and discover. That's why I read posts from you- Patrick, Bob Jewett, Mike Page, $.02 Ron ) )and many other fine posters.
I believe that every shot that you have ever seen can be duplicated by ordinary amateurs like you and I. Unfortunately, there are secrets to performing some of these shots and the secret is sometimes guarded or simply not explained.
Some people simply have the unique ability to do what some of us have to struggle with. That is why I have been thinking about doing a pool video. It is because unlike some players, I have had to struggle to learn and improve. I think that is the case with most players. Some of the phenoms simply "do" and don't have a clue as to the difficulties that some of us mortals face. It may be easier to learn from someone who has struggled to excel rather than from someone who innately excels.
And by the way, Patrick, that low English you used to make that shot is called Buddy Hall Draw. In one of my lessons with Buddy, he showed me what the rest of the world deemed 6:00 Draw, then he showed me what Buddy Hall 6:00 Draw looked like and what it did. Cliff probably learned that draw from Buddy.
...sorry about the poor CueTable skills, I'm sure all of you can figure it out.
In this shot I would play the cue ball position and speed more than the object balls.
I feel that it would require too much velocity to actually pocket the ball. (It all depends on the playing conditions - ball cleanliness, table speed, jaw size, etc.)
But I think you could effectively move both balls into a more aggressive and offensive position on the table in this shot.
The best part about this shot is the ending cue ball position. If you can pin the rock on the end rail, and not show your opponent the bottom of the cue ball it could really be a killer shot.
I agree with the thought process as long as I'm playing a guy who can't play dead.
IMO, one pocket played at a high level does not involve waiting for your opponent to leave you straight in, but rather maneuvering the balls to force him to try to get out of the trap.
The shot choice you explained leans more the direction of the waiting game and not the trapping game.