10 best players in the world

Shane has already won 6 including this years. Why wouldn't he still be considered the best all around player?
Shane has won three DCC Master of the Table awards (2011, 2012, 2026), and he's not done yet. I'll make the same statement about him that I made about Fedor. If he passes Efren and gets six Master of the Table titles, he will have a very reasonable claim for being the best all-around player of all time. Wishing him the best as he chases down "The Magician."
 
In fact, in a chat I had with Fedor at Derby City one time, I told him that I felt that if he passed Efren's Master of the Table count, he'd have a reasonable claim to being the best all-around player ever. Some would suggest Lassiter, who had an incredible record at Johnston City and won tournaments across all the disciplines, is also in the conversation, and perhaps they have a point. Sigel and Varner, of course, are always in the discussion. To pass Efren, Fedor needs three more Derby City Master of the Table awards, and he might well get them, but they won't come easy.
Who knew? A thread about the 10 best players in the world becomes a thread about the best player ever!

I never saw any of the past greats play live. I didn’t start watching pool live until 2020. I’ve watched a lot of past matches involving Reyes, Sigel, Strickland and so on. Yet I'm not qualified to judge the greatest of all time, especially since I haven’t watched all the disciplines intensively.

What I have been thinking, however, is that maybe Efren is not the greatest of all time. Or put another way, maybe he isn’t the greatest rotation player of all time. His subpar break alone certainly seems to suggest so. Has any great player ever had a weaker break? It can't be ignored.
Still, I saw prime Efren Reyes and prime Mike Sigel up close and cannot put either Josh or Fedor above them. Of course, that could well change at some point.
I can accept Efren was the greatest overall pool player. As sjm mentioned in another post, he changed the conception of how the game is played.

I've watched a number of videos evaluating Reyes runouts as part of my learning process, and he was a constant surprise. When I watch modern players, I have gotten to the point at which I can accurately predict how they will shoot almost every shot.

Even now, I can't do that watching a Reyes video. He had the constant capacity to do what no one else thought of - I can't count how many times the announcers themselves were surprised. Eventually they wised up, especially Danny Diliberto, who began to think like Efren when commenting on his games.

As for Filler and Gorst, Josh is 28 and Fedor turns 26 in two months. All-time careers already, but they are arguably just entering their primes, and they will be in their primes for another 10 years. Going to sit back and watch.
 
who is the best.

take them all over to a strange pool room and have them play each other different games till one comes on top.

maybe some play better in just tournaments
some might not play well sleeping in a hotel room
some may need perfect tables and new cloth as in tournaments
the best will be able to adapt to whatever they play on or with.

i know that isn't the best way either but just something to consider when saying someone is best.
best on what conditions. or all conditions.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bbb
Uh...do you like that our sport is third world status?
The world championship pays 250k to the winner. The US Open 100k. Several other tournaments 10s of 1000s. The top players are now getting 6 figure sponsorships. They can earn more in exhibitions in a day than many people in the first world earn in 2 weeks. It's hardly third world status - maybe not yet a "minor major" sport like its bedfellows snooker and darts, but it's doing all right for itself.
 
Who knew? A thread about the 10 best players in the world becomes a thread about the best player ever!

I never saw any of the past greats play live. I didn’t start watching pool live until 2020. I’ve watched a lot of past matches involving Reyes, Sigel, Strickland and so on. Yet I'm not qualified to judge the greatest of all time, especially since I haven’t watched all the disciplines intensively.

What I have been thinking, however, is that maybe Efren is not the greatest of all time. Or put another way, maybe he isn’t the greatest rotation player of all time. His subpar break alone certainly seems to suggest so. Has any great player ever had a weaker break? It can't be ignored.
Efren is clearly not in the discussion for best rotation player ever and, as you noted, it was chiefly because of his break. Also, Efren, the largely undisputed greatest kicker of all time, was hurt by the introduction of the jump cue, which reduced his advantage by making kicking a bit less common. Still, what those of us who watched him remember about Efren is that, even in rotation pool, he'd win when the biggest spots, when the prize money was on the line. He wowed us against Strickland in the race to 120 and again at the Japan Open, which had one of the biggest first prizes ever. I reckon Efren is in the 10-15 range of all time nine ball players.
I can accept Efren was the greatest overall pool player. As sjm mentioned in another post, he changed the conception of how the game is played.

I've watched a number of videos evaluating Reyes runouts as part of my learning process, and he was a constant surprise. When I watch modern players, I have gotten to the point at which I can accurately predict how they will shoot almost every shot.

Even now, I can't do that watching a Reyes video. He had the constant capacity to do what no one else thought of - I can't count how many times the announcers themselves were surprised. Eventually they wised up, especially Danny Diliberto, who began to think like Efren when commenting on his games.
This really isn't accurate. Efren surprised even the best commentators with his choices and ingenuity until the day he retired from mainstream competition. In fact, the entire pro pool world hasn't caught up yet, for it would be difficult to argue that any player of the modern era (possibly excepting Alex Pagulayan) plays with the kind of imagination that we always got from Efren. Billy Incardona, one of Efren's earliest influences, observed "when Efren started doing things that even I didn't understand, I realized he no longer needed my help with his one pocket game."
As for Filler and Gorst, Josh is 28 and Fedor turns 26 in two months. All-time careers already, but they are arguably just entering their primes, and they will be in their primes for another 10 years. Going to sit back and watch.
Not sure of this. A player's peak years can come at any time. Yes, Fedor and Josh will both continue to win big titles, but whether they'll reach a higher level in their games is to be determined. No doubt, we've seen some players find their highest form later on, such as FSR and Chua, but Filler and Gorst are, for lack of a better term, "finished products," and I wonder if they can go much higher given that maintaining their current level will take nothing less than workaholism.
 
Not sure of this. A player's peak years can come at any time. Yes, Fedor and Josh will both continue to win big titles, but whether they'll reach a higher level in their games is to be determined. No doubt, we've seen some players find their highest form later on, such as FSR and Chua, but Filler and Gorst are, for lack of a better term, "finished products," and I wonder if they can go much higher given that maintaining their current level will take nothing less than workaholism.
It's like this in baseball, where most players peak between 27-32, but some players peak in their early 20's and some players remain in peak form all the way up to their late 30's or even their 40's in a handful of cases.
 
  • Like
Reactions: sjm
This really isn't accurate. Efren surprised even the best commentators with his choices and ingenuity until the day he retired from mainstream competition.
I thought that's basically what I said. Or at least what I meant.

I have seen a ton of Reyes matches the past few years. I started with the earliest ones I could find, and then worked from there, to see if I could detect any evolution in his game. I am not sure I can.

Most of the better vids on YouTube start in the late 1980s, with most the bulk coming in the 1990s. By 1989 Efren was already in 35 and he seemed fully formed as a player. Perhaps you remember differently.

I do remember through the 1990s the announcers were ceaselessly surprised by Reyes. They would often mention what they thought he would do, and were they certain about what he couldn't do. Then of course he did it. Diliberto was among those constantly flummoxed.

Duly humbled, announcers later on tended to be less sure of themselves (Well, it's Efren, and he's a a Magician, and so ...).

I could have sworn Diliberto finally began to suggest things Reyes might do that he himself (Dilberto) would never have spotted five or 10 years earlier. Not all the time, of course, but how could anyone watch Efren diligently and not starting thinking up outlandish shots!
A player's peak years can come at any time.
Yes, it can, but in all sports, the mid-20s to early 30s seems to be the norm. A few such as tennis it happens even earlier - Alcaraz is the latest example.

Both players are now fully mature, physically and mentally, when it comes to the game of pool. They are in the prime of their lives in virtually every way. Whether it translates on the table remains to be seen.
Yes, Fedor and Josh will both continue to win big titles, but whether they'll reach a higher level in their games is to be determined.
I think both players are clearly better now than they were two or three years ago. They did rise to higher levels.

Like you, I am not sure they can continue to reach higher planes. Yet one hallmark of growth is consistency. You mentioned FSR. When he fully matured as a player, his consistency skyrocketed.

Fedor and Filler are already extremely consistent. Whether they become even more so is what I will be watching.
 
Last edited:
I think that the DCC tournament with all the side events; Big Foot 10 Ball, Banks Ring Game and Formally Held 14.1 Challenge were a true test of endurance. For any player to play those events and win the "Master of The Table," clearly requires stamina and consistency of game not seen in any other pool tournament. This would also include "Action Matches" as well. So IMO DCC winners are remarkable players.
 
My last list. Who are the emerging young stars in the game? I am unaware of generational talent like Filler or Gorst coming up through the ranks.

Clearly Moritz Neuhausen is the best under-23 player in the world. After that it’s a scramble.

My Top 10 players under 23:

  1. Moritz Neuhausen (22)
  2. Kledio Kaci (20)
  3. Bernie Regalario (21)
  4. Szymon Kural (21)
  5. Albert Januarta (17)
  6. Arseni Sevastyanov (22)
  7. AJ Manas (18)
  8. Felix Vogel (18)
  9. Yannick Pongers (21)
  10. Mika Van Berkel (19)
Really like the young Mr. Pongers. Don't believe he's reached his true gear yet, kid could have a very special game.
 
I thought that's basically what I said. Or at least what I meant.

I have seen a ton of Reyes matches the past few years. I started with the earliest ones I could find, and then worked from there, to see if I could detect any evolution in his game. I am not sure I can.
At rotation games, Efren's best came in the 1985-96 range, although some say it came before that, even before he came to the United States. Some say he played his best in the early 1980s. There was just one guy back then who wore him out at rotation games and that was Sigel, probably the best finisher I've ever watched, not to mention the one that Efren cites as the best player that he's ever seen.
Most of the better vids on YouTube start in the late 1980s, with most the bulk coming in the 1990s. By 1999 Efren was already in 35 and he seemed fully formed as a player. Perhaps you remember differently.
Efren was 45 in 1999, already on the downswing of his prime except, of course, at one pocket, where he was still the one to beat.
I do remember through the 1990s the announcers were ceaselessly surprised by Reyes. They would often mention what they thought he would do, and were they certain about what he couldn't do. Then of course he did it. Diliberto was among those constantly flummoxed.

Duly humbled, announcers later on tended to be less sure of themselves (Well, it's Efren, and he's a a Magician, and so ...).

I could have sworn Diliberto finally began to suggest things Reyes might do that he himself (Dilberto) would never have spotted five or 10 years earlier. Not all the time, of course, but how could anyone watch Efren diligently and not starting thinking up outlandish shots!
Maybe some truth in this, but I'd say that announcers never understood Efren's approach and play, and it's part of why other players never figured out how to do things the way Efren did. He simply thought differently and saw things that nobody else saw.

To be honest, I feel that both American players and commentators failed to understand the nuances in the way all the Filipinos played pool, and that, in part, explains why nearly all the greatest tacticians that have ever played 9ball were Filipino. Only a few Americans have ever played a similar style to the Filipinos, with Varner and Hopkins two obvious examples. It is part of the story in analyzing the rise of the Filipinos and the fall of American pool. In truth, the fact that quite a few European players have adopted at least some of the Filipino tactical style is one of several factors in why American pool has fallen relative to European pool, too, and why they have been outplayed tactically almost every year since 2010 at the Mosconi.
Yes, it can, but in all sports, the mid-20s to early 30s seems to be the norm. A few such as tennis it happens even earlier - Alcaraz is the latest example.

Both players are now fully mature, physically and mentally, when it comes to the game of pool. They are in the prime of their lives in virtually every way. Whether it translates on the table remains to be seen.

I think both players are clearly better now than they were two or three years ago. They did rise to higher levels.

Like you, I am not sure they can continue to reach higher planes. Yet one hallmark of growth is consistency. You mentioned FSR. When he fully matured as a player, his consistency skyrocketed.

Fedor and Filler are already extremely consistent. Whether they become even more so is what I will be watching.
Yes, pretty much how I feel on the subject. I think it's possible Fedor will push Josh to a higher level the way Karen Corr forced Allison Fisher to step up her play some 25 years ago. As we know, Allison answered the challenge and then some. Similarly, Josh may push Fedor to a higher level. It will be fun to watch!
 
At rotation games, Efren's best came in the 1985-96 range, although some say it came before that, even before he came to the United States. Some say he played his best in the early 1980s. There was just one guy back then who wore him out at rotation games and that was Sigel, probably the best finisher I've ever watched, not to mention the one that Efren cites as the best player that he's ever seen.

Efren was 45 in 1999, already on the downswing of his prime except, of course, at one pocket, where he was still the one to beat.

Maybe some truth in this, but I'd say that announcers never understood Efren's approach and play, and it's part of why other players never figured out how to do things the way Efren did. He simply thought differently and saw things that nobody else saw.

To be honest, I feel that both American players and commentators failed to understand the nuances in the way all the Filipinos played pool, and that, in part, explains why nearly all the greatest tacticians that have ever played 9ball were Filipino. Only a few Americans have ever played a similar style to the Filipinos, with Varner and Hopkins two obvious examples. It is part of the story in analyzing the rise of the Filipinos and the fall of American pool. In truth, the fact that quite a few European players have adopted at least some of the Filipino tactical style is one of several factors in why American pool has fallen relative to European pool, too, and why they have been outplayed tactically almost every year since 2010 at the Mosconi.

Yes, pretty much how I feel on the subject. I think it's possible Fedor will push Josh to a higher level the way Karen Corr forced Allison Fisher to step up her play some 25 years ago. As we know, Allison answered the challenge and then some. Similarly, Josh may push Fedor to a higher level. It will be fun to watch!

It's unfortunate (to me as a viewer) that KPC is focusing mainly on Heyball these days, I'd love to see him added to the Filler/Gorst rivalry
 
efren was clearly the best all around by far according to me at least.

but they also changed the game on him in the middle of his career.
jump cues and racking systems. and rule changes.

kicking probably helped him win but shootout imagine what he would be able to do.

efren seemed like he didn't really care about learning jumping or the break as he was happy with his regular play. it did hold him back but i believe it was by choice.

and he won on all kinds of tables even sub par ones and in cash games against the best.

like stu said its all subjective and how we decide is also that.

if we go by tournament results that is certainly a good measure but may not be the best if it leaves out some.

unfortunately most rank players by their current wins.
 
Depends on how much money you have and if rent is due.

I've shot balls to win tournaments that were not near as much pressure as a straight back bank in one hole for $.
i think the point is to acknowledge there is a difference in playing a WPC final for 250k and a texas open first round match. in fargo there isn't.
 
depends whether you are a choker or not. if not, you just get up and shoot the shot same as if it was for nothing.

if you choke under pressure id hate to be in a car with you driving and a deer crosses the road in front of you.
as swerving will roll you can likely kill.

the worlds best bank pool player is a choker. so he cant or doesn't play for much money and rarely does as well as he should in bank games and tournaments. but does come close.
 
In Shane's words, Josh has "worn him out" in competition over the years, going as far as calling Filler an "alien.". In their two most recent meetings, Josh beat Shane 9-0 at the Derby City 9ball and he also beat him convincingly in 10ball in the quarterfinals of the Las Vegas Open 10ball. Yes, Shane has beaten him on rare occasion, including in the 2024 US Open 9ball semis, but he's had an awfully hard time with Josh over the years. If you don't know that, you are uninformed. Finally, attaching any significance to Shane's win at Amsterdam in an exhibition with screaming fans and 5" pockets is comical.

Trying to compare the record in the majors of any player since the Sigel/Varner era to that of Filler is simply time wasted. At age 28, Filler already has more major titles than Shane has at 42.

Filler has been the state of the art for many years now, not always the #1 ranked player, but the most consistent winner of big events., and especially big money events. Inclusive of 2026 earnings, Josh, at age 28, is already #3 on the all-time money list, behind just Shane and Efren, and he'll likely pass both within 3-4 years.

Filler is not only in the conversation for greatest player since Sigel but he is, quite possibly, the only player in the conversation. Perhaps you need to invest some time in comparing his competitive record at the majors to that of any other player you think belongs in the conversation. As for Sigel, he's in the conversation with Mosconi, Greenleaf and Efren for best player of all time, and neither Shane nor Earl are in the conversation with him for best American player of the last 50 years. Sigel is a top five nine ball player of all time and a top five straight pool player of all time. I believe that had he not retired early, he would be viewed as having had a better career than Efren. FYI, both Efren and Earl are on record as saying that "Sigel is the best player I have ever played against."
And Efren always answered a win with "I got lucky".
 
  • Love
Reactions: sjm
And Efren always answered a win with "I got lucky".
Yes, he was one of a kind as both a player and a human being. Actually, I've heard Aloysius Yapp make the "I got lucky" comment after a big win, too, but nobody could say it like Efren. There's only one original.
 
efren has stood the test of time. so has to be the best player ever. but of course not currently as he is an old man but still a great player.

if the best now can last for decades then they can take over the crown.

till then im holding my breath and turning blue.
 
Depends on how much money you have and if rent is due.

I've shot balls to win tournaments that were not near as much pressure as a straight back bank in one hole for $.
Chi Chi Rodrigues, just after winning a PGA event by holing a pressure putt on the 72nd hole, was asked by a commentator "how did you deal with the pressure on the 72nd hole?" His legendary answer was "That's not pressure, Real pressure is a twenty-dollar putt when you only have ten in your pocket."
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: bbb
Back
Top