$100 fast&loose Challenge Rack 6

fast&loose designs

fast&loose designs

Chris Santana
Silver Member
Hey everyone. So I'm back with another $100 fast&loose Challenge Rack. This one is more like a drill, one that I saw in a YouTube video of Ronnie Alcano running balls in this configuration, except that the 1 and 2 balls weren't frozen to the cushions. The drill is already tough, so I made it tougher with those frozen balls. Here are the rules, GOOD LUCK! ::

1. Set up your table exactly as shown (balls are aligned along center diamonds)
2. Set up a camera (or have someone record you).
NOTE: Table must fill at LEAST 40-50% of screen.
3. Take ball in hand.
4. Run the rack in numerical order (ALL BALLS must be made
in corner pockets on the same side of the table).
NOTE: Bottom corner pockets shown; you may use upper.
CUE BALL MUST NOT TOUCH OPPOSITE SIDE RAIL.
6. Upload the video to YouTube.
7. Copy and paste the video link to fast&loose’s Facebook page
(here) AND onto this thread on AZBilliards.

The first player to run ALL BALLS CONSECUTIVELY (and post video)
by Midnight (PT) December 1st, 2013 will win a $100 check
from fast&loose designs

U.S. RESIDENTS ONLY. RACK MUST BE RUN IN CONSECUTIVE NUMERICAL ORDER. FOULS AND/OR SCRATCHES DURING
RUNOUT WILL DISQUALIFY RUNOUT. VIDEO MUST BE UNEDITED (ONE CONTINUOUS RECORDING). JUMP CUES ALLOWED,
LEGAL JUMPS ONLY. YOUTUBE LINKS ONLY. ONLY 9 FOOT TABLES ALLOWED.
QUESTIONS/CONCERNS? EMAIL AT CSANTANA47@GMAIL.COM ANYONE MAY ENTER AND ANYONE CAN WIN.
WINNINGS MAILED OUT JANUARY 1ST, 2014
 

Attachments

  • challenge6-01.jpg
    challenge6-01.jpg
    102.4 KB · Views: 821
Wow, I hope someone does, so I can see it!

That's crazy.

Thanks for throwing it out there, it'll be interesting to follow this.
 
I just tried,,,got to the 4,,,past the hard part ,,,which IMO is from the 2 to the 3.

Can the cue hit the ends rails twice,,,one end then the other end??? I am doing this without that being allowed because I am not sure.
 
I believe Daz and Alcano did it on a TAR Podcast when Alcano was going to play Shaw (not 100%)

:confused:
 
SkyscraperChris said:
Alcano did. I posted the link ^^
Click to expand...

He did a version of it that is about 100 times easier. He used only 9 balls and the 1 and 2 did not start frozen to the rail. When you add the extra 6 balls the ball all get closer and the draw backs that Alcano did to get shape on a few balls become way more difficult as the balls above the target object ball now get more in the way of th4e cueball path.

If anyone does this on a standard 9-foot I will be shocked.
 
Celtic said:
He did a version of it that is about 100 times easier. He used only 9 balls and the 1 and 2 did not start frozen to the rail. When you add the extra 6 balls the ball all get closer and the draw backs that Alcano did to get shape on a few balls become way more difficult as the balls above the target object ball now get more in the way of th4e cueball path.

If anyone does this on a standard 9-foot I will be shocked.
Click to expand...

One guy got to the 14 and missed. On video. Will link soon!
 
Is this thing done....also does it need to be done on a big table?
Baby boxes shouldn't be aloud.

Anthony
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top