100 Qualifiers?

Good post MacGuy. I also doubt that the IPT has any "assets" to go after in the case of litigation. The only ones I can think of are probably the tournament matches already filmed and those are probably "owned" by some other company that no one could get at in a millioin years. But, KT could be sued personally as can Deno Andrews since they have publicly made these promises to the public and thereby enticed participation therewith. Whether anything can be attached to the personal assets or holdings of either man is for the court to decide. One thing about our judical system is that federal courts can and do establish precedent (laws) each day when the existing laws or precedents don't adequately cover the situation brought before the court.

In this case, as a non-lawyer, I can see that a case can be made for international wire fraud through the acceptance of payments for a promise that cannot be upheld. One would have to prove intent to defraud however which is very unlikely in my opinion. It is very easy to say that the funds were assured but due to unforseen circumstances they are no longer and then that's that.

Barry Behrman still owes players for a few US Opens. Anybody want to take bets that this money will never be paid?

The sad truth is that there is rarely a real guarantee until an organization reaches the level of the PGA and there is more at stake than the feelings and financial well beings of a few people. Kevin could walk away from this and the only people who would be really out would be the players who invested some money and their spirit into it.

I just don't believe that Kevin is in this for the short term. I think he is trying to own pool and build a lasting brand and a legacy. I doubt that Kevin Trudeau wants his legacy to be Coral Calcium and Natural Cures. I bet he wants to be remembered as the guy who brought pool into the big time.

Steve Lipsky, if you don't believe that Kevin has any bad intentions then why did you accuse him of running a Ponzi scheme vis-a-vis the qualifiers? A Ponzi/Pyramid scheme is illegal and one does not run one without bad intentions.

The IPT is opaque. It is vague and ever-changing. Perhaps it is overly ambitious at the moment. So far though it has lived up to almost all of the short term goals that were laid out. If nothing else there has been a great influx of cash into the pro poolplayer set that far exceeds what those players have put in to the IPT. In that regard the IPT is way ahead of the game. It's a pretty crappy Ponzi scheme that pays out millions more than it takes in.

For what it's worth, I believe the FedEx check story. I also think that they handled it very, very badly. I have no idea what their options were to disburse the money at the venue in the absence of checks. Everyone seems to think it would have been as easy as going to the casino and having them front the money to Kevin personally. Perhaps it would have been but I doubt it. Anyway you look at it though it's a black eye for sure. As I said I hope it doesn't turn out badly. Until then though I am keeping my fingers crossed and my speculations positive.

John
 
Roy Steffensen said:
Yes, 100 Qualifiers for 1 tournament. But the 50 best players in that tournament are guaranteed 100 000 $. I think that is pretty ok...

Yes, 29,99 and then 5,95 a month till you cancel it. If you are scared of paying 6 $ a month to get the oppurtunity to watch a lot of great poolmatches whenever you like, AND get great discounts on DVD's AND qualifiers. Well, if that scares you off I hope you do not watch movies like Scary Movie 4 ;) I think it is a GREAT offer.


Are you guaranteeing the 100K Roy? I thought so.
 
Wow macguy. That is the first IPT post of yours that I have read that is worth thinking about. Very nice and much better than the KT hating posts. You make some very keen obversations and points.
 
jay helfert said:
Are you guaranteeing the 100K Roy? I thought so.

All I can say is that 256 players are about to play on Barry's promise to pay them.

Each time a pool player enters a tournament then it's an act of faith.

The DBU, Deutsche Billiard Union, required a sanctioning fee for larger tournaments held in Germany. Part of getting the sanction was supposed to be that the entire purse amount be guaranteed. The DBU was supposed to be the watchdog for this. What came out however is that the DBU did not check to see HOW the money was secured and had no power to enforce it.

Where is the UPA in this process? Barry Behrman gets lambasted by Charlie Williams and boycotted for several years for not having guaranteed money in escrow. Kevin Trudeau gets a pass. Why didn't the UPA stand up and collectively bargain with Kevin?

The truth is that any promoter can do whatever he wants to with the players because the players have no voice. None at all. Not with you Jay, not with Barry, and certainly not with Kevin Trudeau.

You know what I'd like to see?

I'd like to see 150 professional players get together and pledge to go out for one year and earn as much as they could playing tournaments, giving lessons, doing exhibitions and agree to put 25% of that amount into the start of a professional tour owned by the players and for the players. The 150 original members each own a percentage of the tour based on how much they contributed to start it.

New players would have to qualify to be on tour and they would be able to earn ownership as well. So the shares would split as the tour grows but each share would be worth more money.

THEN you'd have a collective of the best players with some real negotiating power and some real assets behind them. I'd be real surprised if 150 of the world's best players couldn't raise several million dollars by their own playing ability within a year.

They could then hire a professional staff and have a first class operation.

Think it can't happen?

Look at the history of the PGA and how it started. The PGA is 100% player owned.

John
 
CaptiveBred said:
Wow macguy. That is the first IPT post of yours that I have read that is worth thinking about. Very nice and much better than the KT hating posts. You make some very keen obversations and points.

Thanks, maybe it comes from living the last 2 1/2 months in the woods in a barn with three channels and no internet. Working and staying busy without distractions is good for the mind. Did you know quiet has a sound, it seems to come from inside you. Having said that, I am going back Monday and am defiantly getting a satellite dish and DSL, I am pretty sure it's available there.
 
onepocketchump said:
Steve Lipsky, if you don't believe that Kevin has any bad intentions then why did you accuse him of running a Ponzi scheme vis-a-vis the qualifiers? A Ponzi/Pyramid scheme is illegal and one does not run one without bad intentions.

John

For the record, I don't think he has bad intentions. I don't agree with his strategy to support the tour, which is pyramid-like in its structure. I worry what will happen if the qualifiers aren't successful. There is no valid reason in my mind to have 100 qualifying tournaments (I still can't say it without laughing), except for the incoming money. I don't think he's doing it to have the thing fail; I just worry that it will.

- Steve
 
jay helfert said:
Are you guaranteeing the 100K Roy? I thought so.

Seriously Jay, this is something of the dumbest thing I have ever heard. Why should I guarantee it? I guarantee when I run my own tournaments, and I trust someone when they guarantee something on their tournaments. Like the US Open, the Eurotour or the IPT.

You mean that because I trust them I need to guarantee it too???

Grow up and get a life....
 
Roy Steffensen said:
Seriously Jay, this is something of the dumbest thing I have ever heard. Why should I guarantee it? I guarantee when I run my own tournaments, and I trust someone when they guarantee something on their tournaments. Like the US Open, the Eurotour or the IPT.

You mean that because I trust them I need to guarantee it too???

Grow up and get a life....


Hello Roy, it was a rhetorical question. Please look that word up.
Thank you, I have a nice life, and Pool is only one small part of it.
 
jay helfert said:
Hello Roy, it was a rhetorical question. Please look that word up.
Thank you, I have a nice life, and Pool is only one small part of it.

Sorry Jay, that's my mistake. Really sorry... Editing my previous answer to you right now:

"Seriously Jay, this is something of the dumbest thing I have ever heard."

DELETE "something of"
REPLACE "thing" WITH "rhetorical question"

......working.....

......working.....

EDIT COMPLETE:

"Seriously Jay, this is the dumbest rhetorical question I have ever heard."
 
Steve Lipsky said:
For the record, I don't think he has bad intentions. I don't agree with his strategy to support the tour, which is pyramid-like in its structure. I worry what will happen if the qualifiers aren't successful. There is no valid reason in my mind to have 100 qualifying tournaments (I still can't say it without laughing), except for the incoming money. I don't think he's doing it to have the thing fail; I just worry that it will.

- Steve

I agree Steve, I don't actually believe KT aim was to own pool, looking back at the decisions they have made over the last 12 months I'm convinced his aim was to build a business he can sell for a profit. I've met many people over the years who specialise in building businesses to sell on and it is clear to me this was the aim all along.

Many times on here people have tried to claim that the qualifier revenue could never fund the tour and this is not the aim of the IPT. I disagree, why? because Deno himself said as much when he stated to people that he expected 64 players at each qualifier. I've heard stories of sitting in the office trying to come up with ways to make money, I don't think KT ever expected to invest much of his own money at all in this tour. Why? its obvious, all you have to do is look at the decisions which have been made with the qualifiers. The IPT have refused to lower entry feees despite dwindling numbers and the qualifying events got switched around so they came before the closed events. In addition one of the closed events got cancelled with little explanation.

I think the IPT in its current form will struggle to survive long term. However I think they may have proved that a cut down version of this tour CAN survive and it would STILL be an dramatic improvement on what existed before. I would like to see a tournament every two months, with 500k-1000k added and a better structure of qualifiers. I think that even if the IPT throws the towel in somebody else, pissibly ho will have realised this and will take up the challenge.

In summary things don't look great at the moment as the IPT is obviously having cash flow problems, anyone with an ounce of sense can see that. However they still have a chance to turn it around if they can get through this years schedule and try to improve the cash flow situation. THe worse thing they could do is hold ALL the 6 tournament qualifiers in the first 6 months of next year BEFORE the events proper, this would be the end of the IPT if they try this. But, and its a big BUT, Im now convinced no matter what happens to the IPT pool will never go back to the low level it was at before.
 
Roy Steffensen said:
Sorry Jay, that's my mistake. Really sorry... Editing my previous answer to you right now:

"Seriously Jay, this is something of the dumbest thing I have ever heard."

DELETE "something of"
REPLACE "thing" WITH "rhetorical question"

......working.....

......working.....

EDIT COMPLETE:

"Seriously Jay, this is the dumbest rhetorical question I have ever heard."


ROY,
Like you and so many others, I wished for the success of the IPT. I felt it would be good for everyone in Pool. But now I see the handwriting on the wall, and it is not pretty.
 
You see, all you need to do is run 100 qualifiers to pay off the field in Reno. Then you just need a couple hundred more qualifiers to ... with a capital P and it rhymes with Fonzie and that stands for ... ??
 
Last edited:
Back
Top