Okay, so here it comes. I know this might take some heat, but I must ask.
How do you feel this compares to Mr. 400, John Schmidt or the King, Willie Mosconi?
I am not looking at careers here because Ronnie is a great player but has been so inconsistent over his career.
I feel Ronnie's fastest 147 will never be overtaken in snooker and I feel the same with Mosconi's 500, but how do they compare in your eye or don't they compare at all?
I think both are genius at their respective game, and I find it hard to judge, but wondered what opinions the rest of the community had.
Thanks,
Ben