Again with the "it's too easy" argument. If you're not stringing racks all the time, it's not too easy. How hard could that possibly be to understand? I bet the people saying it are the same ones who say pockets are too large. I refer you to the second sentence in this post.
The problem is actually in playing pool games that are all about luck of the break anyway. The 9 ball break got figured out, and now it's constantly being changed to make it crapshoot again. I can't even count how many times the break rules have been changed at my club: Magic rack/no magic rack, Breakbox/no breakbox (and every possible type of breakbox, even a break "spot", 9 on spot, 1 on spot, 3 point rule, no 3 point rule and every combination of the above. Even a mandatory safe break was tried for a week. Guess what, the winners are pretty much the same people anyway...
There is one solution to this: Leave 9 ball alone. If 9 ball is too easy for you, play 10 ball. If 10 ball is too easy for you, play straight rotation. If that is too easy, play snooker. If that is too easy, play 3 cushion. If that is too easy...try something else, like becoming a qualified brain surgeon in 2 years. That should be a challenge. Of course you could try a pool game where the break is not about chance....You know the ones I mean
If you insist on keeping 9 ball and making the break as random as possible, how about having a computer randomly select ball positions, then placing them by hand. If that's too much work, you could put the balls in a bucket and throw them out over the table. It's fair and equal to all.