90/90 pivot

Reminds me of the time Scott Lee made a similar challenge & when I responded with a fair challenge he backed down & rightfully said that neither one would prove the topic at hand regardless of who Won or Lost the bet.

Either the different distances of the bridge from the CB yields a different angle from the pivot to center or it does not.

Anyone can go to the table & make there own determinations.

PS The general readership of AZB does not need anything interpreted for them. I'm quite sure that they can read & most can probably read between the lines too.



Now you are asking us to believe everything we read......NOT!

randyg
 
Anyone can go to the table & make there own determinations.

Apparently you don't fit into the anyone group then because you won't accept the challenge. I'm sure the general membership at AZ can easily form the correct opinion, you're right about that.

How can you possibly make any detemination when you clearly have no clue about the systems you are continuously trying to nitpick?
 
Now you are asking us to believe everything we read......NOT!

randyg

You can basically call me a liar without knowing the facts if so choose.

I see what's going on here as & I'd bet many others can too.
 
Last edited:
Amazing. I'll bet not one of the naysayers trying to pick Neil's posts and video apart can make 10 shots with 90/90. Doesn't keep these poser experts from nitpicking though.

I didn't pick his video apart but I can if your willing to bet I can't run 10 balls with the system.

I think the confusion with systems stems from everyone having their own way of doing it.
No one seems to be ever wrong.
 
Apparently you don't fit into the anyone group then because you won't accept the challenge. I'm sure the general membership at AZ can easily form the correct opinion, you're right about that.

How can you possibly make any detemination when you clearly have no clue about the systems you are continuously trying to nitpick?

One does not have to have a full understanding of any system to discuss a component of the system or test a component of the system.

By your faulty logic a student in any classroom is not qualified to question anything because he or SHE is not an authority on the subject being taught.

If that were the criteria then the AZB forums should be shut down.

Neil always seems to think that everyone here on AZB is a student looking to learn from him whatever he tries to teach.

My apologies to Mr. Wilson for loosing some restraint but insults are hardly ever well received & some know how to use that weapon.

Your position seems similar. It seems that you think that there are teachers here & everyone else should just shut up & listen & just accept whatever is said with no questioning as to validity of what is being put forth.

If the parties can be civil & non insulting perhaps a discussion could be had. But when insults start the discussion is derailed & that is the purpose of the one that no longer wants the discussion. So they use trolling tactics to end the debate.

In case you did not know, Neil is not God & has made a mistake here & there & was man enough to admit it when he was convinced of the mistake & even apologize. I admire him for that.

I'd be willing to bet that an attack on my manhood is forthcoming.

This is not the place to have a squabble. But IMO you should not have free rein to go around & post the insulting things that you do. Sean & you were once allies but Sean said something that you did not like & now you're his 'enemy'.

How about we agree that we don't like each others persona & let the thread get back onto the original topic?

My apologies to Mr. Wilson for loosing some restraint but insults are hardly ever well received & some know how to use that as a weapon.
 
Last edited:
I didn't pick his video apart but I can if your willing to bet I can't run 10 balls with the system.

I think the confusion with systems stems from everyone having their own way of doing it.
No one seems to be ever wrong.


interesting post, Who would you ask for advice, the guy that wins the race or the guy that quits the race because it was difficult or the guy that was never willing to be in a race?
 
interesting post, Who would you ask for advice, the guy that wins the race or the guy that quits the race because it was difficult or the guy that was never willing to be in a race?

Or would you ask Marty McFly advice about how to not be goated into a pointless fight?

Or would you advise to not fight the bully?
 
One does not have to have a full understanding of any system to discuss a component of the system or test a component of the system.

By your faulty logic a student in any classroom is not qualified to question anything because he or SHE is not an authority on the subject being taught.

If that were the criteria then the AZB forums should be shut down.

Neil always seems to think that everyone here on AZB is a student looking to learn from him whatever he tries to teach.

Your position seems similar. It seems that you think that there are teachers here & everyone else should just shut up & listen & just accept whatever is said with no questioning as to validity of what is being put forth.

If the parties can be civil & non insulting perhaps a discussion could be had. But when insults start the discussion is derailed & that is the purpose of the one that no longer wants the discussion. So they use trolling tactics to end the debate.

In case you did not know, Neil is not God & has made a mistake here & there & was man enough to admit it when he was convinced of the mistake & even apologize. I admire him for that.

I'd be willing to bet that an attack on my manhood is forthcoming.

This is not the place to have a squabble. But IMO you should not have free rein to go around & post the insulting things that you do. Sean & you were once allies but Sean said something that you did not like & now you're his 'enemy'.

How about we agree that we don't like each others persona & let the thread get back onto the original topic?

That's a bunch of BS as usual from you. If you consider me calling a spade a spade, then I guess I'm insulting you. Stating facts is hardly insulting. I don't recall ever attacking your manhood, perhaps you can provide a link to the post where I did that. Or perhaps, as usual, you're simply blowing smoke.

Your analogy is pure BS. You don't have to be an expert to ask a question but you at least need to have a rudimentary understanding of the system to ask a meaningful question. The issues haven't been questions. The issues have been explicit and implied criticism that is totally unfounded. Example: Lou called Stan's system bogus. Your questions are almost always posed as critical statements posing as a question, technically a question because you add a word or two and a question mark at the end of the sentence. That's fooling nobody.

I've never been an "ally" of Sean's. At one time, we apparently shared a mutual dislike for you. I can't, and don't care, to speak for Sean but I can tell you my view on that hasn't changed one iota.

I realize you're trying to bait me in order to get me banned. Nice try (not really). It must be sad to live in such a sorry state. Regardless of what you post, I'm not going to start calling you name and making personal attacks. Your posts speak for themselves. You should stick to posting images of females in the NPR.
 
You can basically call me a liar without knowing the facts if so choose.

I see what's going on here as & I'd bet many others can too.

Wow, now you're attacking one of the most respected members of this site. Amazing. Equally amazing is this statement:

without knowing the facts

You continuously post on CTE threads without knowing any facts. Amazing.
 
Or would you ask Marty McFly advice about how to not be goated into a pointless fight?

Or would you advise to not fight the bully?

On here you really have to try and back your opinions up ya know what I mean? Speculating and non informed opinions get you into battles on here. Dont wory there are only a few people on here i genuinely think are just not good people and your not one of them :)
 
On here you really have to try and back your opinions up ya know what I mean? Speculating and non informed opinions get you into battles on here. Dont wory there are only a few people on here i genuinely think are just not good people and your not one of them :)

Hey now..you forgot to mention me.:)
 
On here you really have to try and back your opinions up ya know what I mean? Speculating and non informed opinions get you into battles on here. Dont wory there are only a few people on here i genuinely think are just not good people and your not one of them :)

I think that was a slight compliment given the smiley face. But. I disagree with you regarding there being just a few, I'll say, not nice people here on AZB.

But given the nature we should probably define the word 'few'.

few
fyo͞o/Submit
adjective & pronoun
1.
a small number of.
"may I ask a few questions?"
synonyms: a small number, a handful, one or two, a couple, two or three;

Best to Ya',
Rick
 
And the CTE'ers continuously post in every single aiming thread no matter what system is being discussed.

It would be nice if the threads stayed on topic.

Well, I spent time working with CTE, SEE and 90/90. While the 90/90 DVD didn't work well for me, Neil spent some of his personal time helping me with that system.

What was your point again? You say I post in every single aiming thread? How much would you like to wager on that statement? Please make it a very, very large amount. Or are you just another person who likes to make completely unfounded statements? Oops, that obviously qualifies as rhetorical.
 
Wow, now you're attacking one of the most respected members of this site. Amazing. Equally amazing is this statement:



You continuously post on CTE threads without knowing any facts. Amazing.

Originally Posted by nobcitypool View Post
...I've been told by several people that know you and have seen you at the table that you can't sink 3 balls in a row....


Originally Posted by randyg View Post
Now you are asking us to believe everything we read......NOT!

Nob,

You seem to have an anti, anti issue with both 'authoritative' figures. Maybe it's because you own your own business & have NEARLY always been answered, 'Yes Sir' & 'No Sir.'
Maybe you should give that some consideration.
 
Last edited:
I think that was a slight compliment given the smiley face. But. I disagree with you regarding there being just a few, I'll say, not nice people here on AZB.

But given the nature we should probably define the word 'few'.

few
fyo͞o/Submit
adjective & pronoun
1.
a small number of.
"may I ask a few questions?"
synonyms: a small number, a handful, one or two, a couple, two or three;

Best to Ya',
Rick


3 people if your curious lol
 
That's a bunch of BS as usual from you. If you consider me calling a spade a spade, then I guess I'm insulting you. Stating facts is hardly insulting. I don't recall ever attacking your manhood, perhaps you can provide a link to the post where I did that. Or perhaps, as usual, you're simply blowing smoke. 'I'd be willing to bet that an attack on my manhood is forthcoming. You either don't read well or don't comprehend well or want to twist & distort for your benefit.

Your analogy is pure BS. You don't have to be an expert to ask a question but you at least need to have a rudimentary understanding of the system to ask a meaningful question. The issues haven't been questions. The issues have been explicit and implied criticism that is totally unfounded. Example: Lou called Stan's system bogus. Your questions are almost always posed as critical statements posing as a question, technically a question because you add a word or two and a question mark at the end of the sentence. That's fooling nobody.

I've never been an "ally" of Sean's. At one time, we apparently shared a mutual dislike for you. I can't, and don't care, to speak for Sean but I can tell you my view on that hasn't changed one iota.

I realize you're trying to bait me in order to get me banned. Nice try (not really). It must be sad to live in such a sorry state. Regardless of what you post, I'm not going to start calling you name and making personal attacks. Your posts speak for themselves. You should stick to posting images of females in the NPR.

SO...you are either looking at them, don't like females, OR...you're stalking me. Which is it?
 
Last edited:
Back
Top