A Hierarchy for Advanced Pool Skillls Acquisition

Andrew...Remember, you're trying to think about speed, in terms of your forearm and your template (which is all about grip pressure, cue weight and timing). That's the only way you can deliver the right amount of strokespeed, on demand, under pressure. When you use 'force', most people think about ramming the cue through the CB. You're right...you do have to be very precise...which is why finesse rules! :D

Scott Lee
www.poolknowledge.com

Stun requires precision. You've got to hit a very precise distance below center with a very precise amount of force. Use less stroke, you have to hit lower. Use more stroke, you have to get closer to center. If you can do it right, it makes for a very predictable CB path (90-degree rule is easy to visualize), but it's touchier than many instructors acknowledge.

-Andrew
 
rail fiirst and follow

John,

You could say that I play an unorthodox game but actually it is the game that has changed with the coming of nine ball and I didn't. The reason is simple, for everyone but the elite players follow and natural angles are easier to control than draw. Although I am talking primarily longer shots here, this is true of middle distance shots too. I would far rather come two or three rails with natural roll than fewer rails using draw and side to accomplish the same result. I suspect that we are in full agreement that a player needs to do both but often we have the option of doing either.

All we have to do is watch any nine or ten ball tournament to see players hooking themselves with only five or less balls left on the table when they try to draw for pinpoint shape. Often a better solution to the puzzle is to use follow and there is next to no risk for that particular situation but the player is mentally geared to draw shots over and over. Often too I see players using draw that brings the cue ball across the angle they need for shape when follow would bring the cue ball down a much more forgiving angle. An old school saying but still often very true today, "draw for show, follow for dough!" If both options give an acceptable result I'll always choose follow for a pressure shot.

I learned my game from watching the older players that learned when straight pool was the game. I also spent some time on 5x10's with slow cloth and I spent a lot of time on very tight snooker tables for several years. All of these things will make your game less about show and more about getting the job done. Minimize having to juice the cue ball with anything and minimize risk.

The further the ball is off the rail and the steeper the angle the tougher the off the rail shot becomes of course. However I would easily double your distance from the pocket and still use it. Basically if I can go rail first at a moderate angle before the side pocket interferes I consider it a viable shot. Typically favored when the object ball is less than a ball off of the rail but that distance can be doubled when the off the rail shot is one that you use often. Something that isn't mentioned is that the off the rail shot can often change a shot with a strong possibility of scratching into one with no possibility of scratching. The opposite is true too but not as often. With moderate angles off of the rail the cue ball is usually coming out to an area in the middle of the table.

Rail first and follow are two of my strengths that many nine ball players are comparatively weak at and force follow with any real effect is generally accepted as impossible now. I've had more than one player come out of their chair when the cue ball took an "impossible" path! :D :D

My philosophies concerning play are simple. Don't juice the cue ball when you don't have to and don't travel the cue ball when you don't have to. John Schmidt is a modern champion that practices a lot using straight pool. One of the strengths of his game is that he does an excellent job of avoiding trouble. Willie Mosconi was maybe the best product rep a pool company ever had because he shot almost all simple shots. He not only was a fantastic player, he made pool look so easy that the average Joe watching him thought they could play as well as Willie did with a little practice.

Hu
 
Very nice..

People forget that the object is to win. Learning to play safe and to play smart will greatly raise the winning percentage and IMO help later on with ones learning curve.
Even shooting safe players are learning speed, banks and patterns. You need all of this and it will help.

As for teaching english early thats something I have always wondered about. Years ago I played golf reguarly and struggled with controling the ball and its path. I tried to line up and hit to straight to where I wanted it to land.
I took a lesson and the Pro told me that was one of the biggest mistakes by Ams. Pros and even good AMs rarely hit the ball straight. He showed me a few things and I could not believe the difference.
I was working the ball and even though I still had mistakes/mishits/poor judgement by scores came down.

One of the big issues is whether a beginner can find center and if they can hit it when trying. I would love to see a training aid that just allows a shooter to aim at an 8th inch target from multiple angles and get feedback whether they hit that spot or not.

I wonder if teaching english would at least take one varible away from the beginner (ie. one half of the ball). Many the mishits would be close in line with what they are trying.

Nice blog
 
ShootingArts,

I hope you didn't take my comment of Unorthodox as being negative in any way. I just meant that your style would really stand out as being different from what I'm used to seeing. I admit though, that I'm not an old timer.

I agree with the pool proverb "draw for show, follow for dough". It's the rail first that stands out, not the preference for follow over draw. I rarely see a player use rail first except to make a blocked ball.

Frankncali,

On english, I agree that it's use can help make one a better player, I just think it's a question of how much a person should already know before they complicate everything with sidespin. I have it pretty low in the hierarchy, before a person can get beat the 4 ball ghost. I thought that was plenty early. I remain convinced that the sink or swim approach yields better skill acquisition, but I admit I don't have any data to back up my opinion.

One of the big issues is whether a beginner can find center and if they can hit it when trying. I would love to see a training aid that just allows a shooter to aim at an 8th inch target from multiple angles and get feedback whether they hit that spot or not.

I remember seeing a device at a booth in Vegas a couple years ago when I was there for the BCA Nationals. It had a small red led as a target. You would put it on one rail and shoot from the other side or other end of the table and try to hit the light exactly. It would tell you if you were close enough. I don't remember any other details, and haven't seen it since.

Thanks for the kind words about the blog.
 
Back
Top