Many pros do. If they have a low stance, the follow through is brief as the stroke just runs out of room to go any further.
When experimenting with a higher stance (for back and for glasses over contacts), a few regulars commented on how my stroke was so much better with glasses. That I was getting through the ball very well. Really though, the higher stance and longer follow through, which generally finished with the tip on the cloth just suited their eye more and was a better fit for what they thought was a good stroke. In reality, I changed nothing about what I was doing and I have a ton of cue power even out of my low stance which finishes barely past the cb with the tip staying off the cloth. The only difference was that i was a couple inches higher so my grip hand had a little more room to travel before it ran out of room. Underneath the different appearance, to me, the high and low stance strokes were exactly the same.
In the end, I couldn't get used to the vantage point difference for sighting longer shots and returned to my preferred low stance with contact lenses over glasses, much to the chagrin of the old timers that way over value a longer follow through.